Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Configuable product: duplicate get attribute options #38000

Open
5 tasks
rogerdz opened this issue Sep 19, 2023 · 9 comments · May be fixed by #38001
Open
5 tasks

Configuable product: duplicate get attribute options #38000

rogerdz opened this issue Sep 19, 2023 · 9 comments · May be fixed by #38001
Assignees
Labels
Area: Performance Component: Attributes Issue: Confirmed Gate 3 Passed. Manual verification of the issue completed. Issue is confirmed Priority: P2 A defect with this priority could have functionality issues which are not to expectations. Progress: PR in progress Reproduced on 2.4.x The issue has been reproduced on latest 2.4-develop branch

Comments

@rogerdz
Copy link
Contributor

rogerdz commented Sep 19, 2023

Preconditions and environment

  • Magento version 2.4-develop
  • Anything else that would help a developer reproduce the bug

Steps to reproduce

  1. add code in function getAttributeOptions (Magento\ConfigurableProduct\Model\AttributeOptionProvider)
    var_dump($superAttribute->getAttributeId(). '-'. $productId . '-'. $scope->getId());

image
2. Clean cache
3. Go to random 1 configuable product

Expected result

no duplicate call function getAttributeOptions with same superAttribute and productId

Actual result

duplicate call function getAttributeOptions with same superAttribute and productId
image

Additional information

No response

Release note

No response

Triage and priority

  • Severity: S0 - Affects critical data or functionality and leaves users without workaround.
  • Severity: S1 - Affects critical data or functionality and forces users to employ a workaround.
  • Severity: S2 - Affects non-critical data or functionality and forces users to employ a workaround.
  • Severity: S3 - Affects non-critical data or functionality and does not force users to employ a workaround.
  • Severity: S4 - Affects aesthetics, professional look and feel, “quality” or “usability”.
@m2-assistant
Copy link

m2-assistant bot commented Sep 19, 2023

Hi @rogerdz. Thank you for your report.
To speed up processing of this issue, make sure that the issue is reproducible on the vanilla Magento instance following Steps to reproduce. To deploy vanilla Magento instance on our environment, Add a comment to the issue:


Join Magento Community Engineering Slack and ask your questions in #github channel.
⚠️ According to the Magento Contribution requirements, all issues must go through the Community Contributions Triage process. Community Contributions Triage is a public meeting.
🕙 You can find the schedule on the Magento Community Calendar page.
📞 The triage of issues happens in the queue order. If you want to speed up the delivery of your contribution, join the Community Contributions Triage session to discuss the appropriate ticket.

@m2-assistant
Copy link

m2-assistant bot commented Sep 19, 2023

Hi @engcom-Delta. Thank you for working on this issue.
In order to make sure that issue has enough information and ready for development, please read and check the following instruction: 👇

  • 1. Verify that issue has all the required information. (Preconditions, Steps to reproduce, Expected result, Actual result).
  • 2. Verify that issue has a meaningful description and provides enough information to reproduce the issue.
  • 3. Add Area: XXXXX label to the ticket, indicating the functional areas it may be related to.
  • 4. Verify that the issue is reproducible on 2.4-develop branch
    Details- Add the comment @magento give me 2.4-develop instance to deploy test instance on Magento infrastructure.
    - If the issue is reproducible on 2.4-develop branch, please, add the label Reproduced on 2.4.x.
    - If the issue is not reproducible, add your comment that issue is not reproducible and close the issue and stop verification process here!
  • 5. Add label Issue: Confirmed once verification is complete.
  • 6. Make sure that automatic system confirms that report has been added to the backlog.

@engcom-Delta
Copy link
Contributor

@magento give me 2.4-develop instance

@magento-deployment-service
Copy link

Hi @engcom-Delta. Thank you for your request. I'm working on Magento instance for you.

@magento-deployment-service
Copy link

@engcom-Delta
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @rogerdz,

We have tried to replicate this issue and it is reproducible.

Below are the steps followed.

  1. Add code in function getAttributeOptions (Magento\ConfigurableProduct\Model\AttributeOptionProvider)
    var_dump($superAttribute->getAttributeId(). '-'. $productId . '-'. $scope->getId());
  2. Clean cache
  3. Go to random 1 configurable product.
Screenshot 2023-09-21 at 2 23 00 PM

Hence confirming this issue.

Thanks,

@engcom-Delta engcom-Delta added Area: Performance Component: Attributes Area: Product Issue: Confirmed Gate 3 Passed. Manual verification of the issue completed. Issue is confirmed and removed Area: Performance Issue: ready for confirmation labels Sep 21, 2023
@github-jira-sync-bot github-jira-sync-bot removed the Issue: Confirmed Gate 3 Passed. Manual verification of the issue completed. Issue is confirmed label Sep 21, 2023
@github-jira-sync-bot
Copy link

Unfortunately, not enough information was provided to create a Jira ticket. Please make sure you added the following label(s): Reproduced on 2.4.x, ^Area:.*

Once all required labels are present, please add Issue: Confirmed label again.

@engcom-Delta engcom-Delta added Issue: Confirmed Gate 3 Passed. Manual verification of the issue completed. Issue is confirmed Reproduced on 2.4.x The issue has been reproduced on latest 2.4-develop branch and removed Issue: ready for confirmation labels Sep 21, 2023
@github-jira-sync-bot
Copy link

✅ Jira issue https://jira.corp.adobe.com/browse/AC-9587 is successfully created for this GitHub issue.

@m2-assistant
Copy link

m2-assistant bot commented Sep 21, 2023

✅ Confirmed by @engcom-Delta. Thank you for verifying the issue.
Issue Available: @engcom-Delta, You will be automatically unassigned. Contributors/Maintainers can claim this issue to continue. To reclaim and continue work, reassign the ticket to yourself.

@engcom-Hotel engcom-Hotel added the Priority: P2 A defect with this priority could have functionality issues which are not to expectations. label Sep 26, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Area: Performance Component: Attributes Issue: Confirmed Gate 3 Passed. Manual verification of the issue completed. Issue is confirmed Priority: P2 A defect with this priority could have functionality issues which are not to expectations. Progress: PR in progress Reproduced on 2.4.x The issue has been reproduced on latest 2.4-develop branch
Projects
Status: Pull Request In Progress
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants