Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Issue] Use Object Cache for Category Links to avoid redundant calls #29654

Closed
4 tasks
m2-assistant bot opened this issue Aug 18, 2020 · 4 comments
Closed
4 tasks

[Issue] Use Object Cache for Category Links to avoid redundant calls #29654

m2-assistant bot opened this issue Aug 18, 2020 · 4 comments
Assignees
Labels
Area: Catalog Component: Catalog Issue: Confirmed Gate 3 Passed. Manual verification of the issue completed. Issue is confirmed Issue: Format is not valid Gate 1 Failed. Automatic verification of issue format is failed Priority: P2 A defect with this priority could have functionality issues which are not to expectations. Progress: done Reproduced on 2.4.x The issue has been reproduced on latest 2.4-develop branch Severity: S3 Affects non-critical data or functionality and does not force users to employ a workaround.

Comments

@m2-assistant
Copy link

m2-assistant bot commented Aug 18, 2020

This issue is automatically created based on existing pull request: #29565: Use Object Cache for Category Links to avoid redundant calls


Description (*)

Having 52 products in cart, I get 156 requests to the database:
image
This PR goal is to reduce this to 52.

After change, for 26 products:
image

This is a part of #29376 process.

Related Pull Requests

Fixed Issues (if relevant)

  1. Continuation of Checkout / Sales Rules / Get rid of redundant DB query #29376

Manual testing scenarios (*)

N/A

Questions or comments

N/A

Contribution checklist (*)

  • Pull request has a meaningful description of its purpose
  • All commits are accompanied by meaningful commit messages
  • All new or changed code is covered with unit/integration tests (if applicable)
  • All automated tests passed successfully (all builds are green)
@m2-assistant m2-assistant bot added Component: Catalog Priority: P2 A defect with this priority could have functionality issues which are not to expectations. Severity: S3 Affects non-critical data or functionality and does not force users to employ a workaround. labels Aug 18, 2020
@ghost ghost assigned lbajsarowicz Aug 18, 2020
@magento-engcom-team magento-engcom-team added the Issue: Format is not valid Gate 1 Failed. Automatic verification of issue format is failed label Aug 18, 2020
@ghost ghost unassigned lbajsarowicz Sep 16, 2020
@engcom-Bravo engcom-Bravo added Area: Catalog Reproduced on 2.4.x The issue has been reproduced on latest 2.4-develop branch Issue: Confirmed Gate 3 Passed. Manual verification of the issue completed. Issue is confirmed labels Aug 25, 2021
@github-jira-sync-bot
Copy link

✅ Jira issue https://jira.corp.magento.com/browse/AC-999 is successfully created for this GitHub issue.

@m2-assistant
Copy link
Author

m2-assistant bot commented Aug 25, 2021

✅ Confirmed by @engcom-Bravo. Thank you for verifying the issue.
Issue Available: @engcom-Bravo, You will be automatically unassigned. Contributors/Maintainers can claim this issue to continue. To reclaim and continue work, reassign the ticket to yourself.

@engcom-Hotel engcom-Hotel moved this to Ready for Development in High Priority Backlog Aug 19, 2024
@engcom-Bravo engcom-Bravo self-assigned this Oct 21, 2024
Copy link
Author

m2-assistant bot commented Oct 21, 2024

Hi @engcom-Bravo. Thank you for working on this issue.
Looks like this issue is already verified and confirmed. But if you want to validate it one more time, please, go though the following instruction:

    1. Add/Edit Area: XXXXX label to the ticket, indicating the functional areas it may be related to.
    1. Verify that the issue is reproducible on 2.4-develop branch
      Details- If the issue is reproducible on 2.4-develop branch, please, add the label Reproduced on 2.4.x.
      - If the issue is not reproducible, add your comment that issue is not reproducible and close the issue and stop verification process here!
    1. If the issue is not relevant or is not reproducible any more, feel free to close it.

@engcom-Bravo
Copy link
Contributor

Hi,

Thanks for your reporting and collaboration.

Since related PR has been closed we are closing this issue.

Thanks.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Area: Catalog Component: Catalog Issue: Confirmed Gate 3 Passed. Manual verification of the issue completed. Issue is confirmed Issue: Format is not valid Gate 1 Failed. Automatic verification of issue format is failed Priority: P2 A defect with this priority could have functionality issues which are not to expectations. Progress: done Reproduced on 2.4.x The issue has been reproduced on latest 2.4-develop branch Severity: S3 Affects non-critical data or functionality and does not force users to employ a workaround.
Projects
Status: Ready for Development
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants