From 978fa207ccb37fda69be607648641d378806c03f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Maxim Lyuzin Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 16:00:02 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] Update README.md --- README.md | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index 99525e7..685902a 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -16,9 +16,10 @@ So, according to the article it should be CONV3x3->BN->ReLU -> Residual Block(?? ![ResBlock_contracting](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/73649419/116404556-6d93c300-a837-11eb-92ba-64a560383338.jpg) -But autors write, that in expansive path (up) there is similar structure CONV3x3->BN->ReLU -> Residual Block(???) -> CONV3x3->BN->ReLU and it's impossible to use residual connection below (figure from article) because first CONV3x3 reduces channels by two, and second CONV3x3 reduces again channels by two, and that makes no sence (and possibility, because numbers of channels don't match) to use residual connection here - ![1](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/73649419/116405461-599c9100-a838-11eb-9405-8d951600ab35.jpg) - ![ResBlock_expansive](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/73649419/116405910-d7f93300-a838-11eb-9e8d-352c3719344e.jpg) +But autors write, that in expansive path (up) there is similar structure CONV3x3->BN->ReLU -> Residual Block(???) -> CONV3x3->BN->ReLU and it's impossible to use residual connection below (figure from article) because first CONV3x3 reduces channels by two, and second CONV3x3 reduces again channels by two, and that makes no sence (and possibility, because numbers of channels don't match) to use residual connection here like in contracting path. But i've tried to make following residual connection. + +![1](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/73649419/116405461-599c9100-a838-11eb-9405-8d951600ab35.jpg) +![ResBlock_expansive](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/73649419/116407708-b6994680-a83a-11eb-9e97-451050b29b8f.jpg) # Dataset