Is this a bug?

[mjstudio]

I am wondering if
check_dnfreq(s2ctx, D, &txjob->rx2freq, &txjob->dnchnl);
should be check_dnfreq(s2ctx, D, &txjob->rx2freq, &txjob->dnchnl2);
in the following function?

void handle_dnmsg (s2ctx_t* s2ctx, ujdec_t* D) {
... ...
case J_Freq:
case J_RX1Freq: {
check_dnfreq(s2ctx, D, &txjob->freq, &txjob->dnchnl);
flags |= 0x0200;
break;
}
case J_RX2DR: {
check_dr(s2ctx, D, &txjob->rx2dr);
flags |= 0x0400;
break;
}
case J_RX2Freq: {
check_dnfreq(s2ctx, D, &txjob->rx2freq, &txjob->dnchnl);
flags |= 0x0800;
break;
}
...
}

[ogimenez-smtc]

Hi,

You are right it seems to be an issue, we will confirm it and correct it if required