You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently the only way (?) to include the metadata fields in an output is by using the rubydebug codec, which is fine if the consumer is human but if a program is to read the data that's not very useful. I suggest that the json_lines codec gets the same treatment. If this is accepted I'll make the same addition to the json codec.
A case in point is the Logstash Filter Verifier tool which currently can't be used to test Logstash configurations that output events with metadata fields set as is relies on being able to parse the Logstash output via the json_lines codec. Being able to test metadata fields was requested in magnusbaeck/logstash-filter-verifier#5.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently the only way (?) to include the metadata fields in an output is by using the rubydebug codec, which is fine if the consumer is human but if a program is to read the data that's not very useful. I suggest that the json_lines codec gets the same treatment. If this is accepted I'll make the same addition to the json codec.
A case in point is the Logstash Filter Verifier tool which currently can't be used to test Logstash configurations that output events with metadata fields set as is relies on being able to parse the Logstash output via the json_lines codec. Being able to test metadata fields was requested in magnusbaeck/logstash-filter-verifier#5.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: