You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We've been using your address verification services for a while with great success so far. The API is easy to use. Response times are impressive, and no false positives whatsoever. An absolute A+.
Now we started integrating autocomplete services with great success, too, but we ran into this particular situation:
If we make an API call using a regular address without any STE or APT "components," everything works as expected:
At the moment, we are whipping out STE, APT, and friends from the address prefix, and everything works like a charm, but we are wondering if it'll be possible to pass those along and maybe even get them back as part of the response.
Most services don't include apartment or floor information because it's almost impossible to track, but we are curious if we are missing something obvious here. A hidden setting or something like that, maybe?
Thanks in advance, and keep up the excellent work!!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hey guys, hope you are doing great!
We've been using your address verification services for a while with great success so far. The API is easy to use. Response times are impressive, and no false positives whatsoever. An absolute A+.
Now we started integrating autocomplete services with great success, too, but we ran into this particular situation:
If we make an API call using a regular address without any STE or APT "components," everything works as expected:
However, if we include the STE number, we get no results back:
At the moment, we are whipping out STE, APT, and friends from the address prefix, and everything works like a charm, but we are wondering if it'll be possible to pass those along and maybe even get them back as part of the response.
Most services don't include apartment or floor information because it's almost impossible to track, but we are curious if we are missing something obvious here. A hidden setting or something like that, maybe?
Thanks in advance, and keep up the excellent work!!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: