Skip to content

[MLIR][Bufferization] Remove GEN_PASS_DEF_BUFFERIZATIONBUFFERIZE #128842

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 26, 2025

Conversation

chelini
Copy link
Contributor

@chelini chelini commented Feb 26, 2025

It was related to the old bufferization mechanism, which has since been retired.

It was related to the old bufferization mechanism, which has since been retired.
@llvmbot llvmbot added mlir mlir:bufferization Bufferization infrastructure labels Feb 26, 2025
@llvmbot
Copy link
Member

llvmbot commented Feb 26, 2025

@llvm/pr-subscribers-mlir

@llvm/pr-subscribers-mlir-bufferization

Author: lorenzo chelini (chelini)

Changes

It was related to the old bufferization mechanism, which has since been retired.


Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/128842.diff

1 Files Affected:

  • (modified) mlir/lib/Dialect/Bufferization/Transforms/Bufferize.cpp (-1)
diff --git a/mlir/lib/Dialect/Bufferization/Transforms/Bufferize.cpp b/mlir/lib/Dialect/Bufferization/Transforms/Bufferize.cpp
index 313dbbd16984b..2881265bf6a10 100644
--- a/mlir/lib/Dialect/Bufferization/Transforms/Bufferize.cpp
+++ b/mlir/lib/Dialect/Bufferization/Transforms/Bufferize.cpp
@@ -26,7 +26,6 @@
 
 namespace mlir {
 namespace bufferization {
-#define GEN_PASS_DEF_BUFFERIZATIONBUFFERIZE
 #define GEN_PASS_DEF_ONESHOTBUFFERIZE
 #include "mlir/Dialect/Bufferization/Transforms/Passes.h.inc"
 } // namespace bufferization

@chelini chelini merged commit ec9c293 into llvm:main Feb 26, 2025
14 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
mlir:bufferization Bufferization infrastructure mlir
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants