Skip to content

Commit 0783db5

Browse files
author
tripleCC
committed
[analyzer] Fix false negative when accessing a nonnull property from a nullable object
1 parent b29b6cc commit 0783db5

File tree

2 files changed

+16
-1
lines changed

2 files changed

+16
-1
lines changed

clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/NullabilityChecker.cpp

Lines changed: 9 additions & 1 deletion
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -899,6 +899,14 @@ void NullabilityChecker::checkPostCall(const CallEvent &Call,
899899
const NullabilityState *TrackedNullability =
900900
State->get<NullabilityMap>(Region);
901901

902+
// ObjCMessageExpr gets the actual type through
903+
// Sema::getMessageSendResultType, instead of using the return type of
904+
// MethodDecl directly. The final type is generated by considering the
905+
// nullability of receiver and MethodDecl together. Thus, The type of
906+
// ObjCMessageExpr is prefer.
907+
if (const Expr *E = Call.getOriginExpr())
908+
ReturnType = E->getType();
909+
902910
if (!TrackedNullability &&
903911
getNullabilityAnnotation(ReturnType) == Nullability::Nullable) {
904912
State = State->set<NullabilityMap>(Region, Nullability::Nullable);
@@ -1053,7 +1061,7 @@ void NullabilityChecker::checkPostObjCMessage(const ObjCMethodCall &M,
10531061
}
10541062

10551063
// No tracked information. Use static type information for return value.
1056-
Nullability RetNullability = getNullabilityAnnotation(RetType);
1064+
Nullability RetNullability = getNullabilityAnnotation(Message->getType());
10571065

10581066
// Properties might be computed, which means the property value could
10591067
// theoretically change between calls even in commonly-observed cases like

clang/test/Analysis/nullability.mm

Lines changed: 7 additions & 0 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ - (void)takesUnspecified:(int *)p;
5555
@property(readonly, nullable) void (^propReturnsNullableBlock)(void);
5656
@property(readonly, nullable) int *propReturnsNullable;
5757
@property(readonly) int *propReturnsUnspecified;
58+
+ (nullable TestObject *)getNullableObject;
5859
@end
5960

6061
TestObject * getUnspecifiedTestObject();
@@ -256,6 +257,12 @@ void testObjCPropertyReadNullability() {
256257
case 8:
257258
[o takesNonnullBlock:o.propReturnsNullableBlock]; // expected-warning {{Nullable pointer is passed to a callee that requires a non-null 1st parameter}}
258259
break;
260+
case 9:
261+
[o takesNonnull:getNullableTestObject().propReturnsNonnull]; // expected-warning {{Nullable pointer is passed to a callee that requires a non-null 1st parameter}}
262+
break;
263+
case 10:
264+
[o takesNonnull:[TestObject getNullableObject].propReturnsNonnull]; // expected-warning {{Nullable pointer is passed to a callee that requires a non-null 1st parameter}}
265+
break;
259266
}
260267
}
261268

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)