Skip to content

templates: add almalinux-kitten-10 #3084

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 4, 2025

Conversation

afbjorklund
Copy link
Member

@afbjorklund afbjorklund commented Jan 5, 2025

@AkihiroSuda AkihiroSuda added this to the v1.1.0 (tentative) milestone Jan 5, 2025
@AkihiroSuda AkihiroSuda modified the milestones: v1.0.5, v1.1 (tentative) Feb 4, 2025
@AkihiroSuda AkihiroSuda modified the milestones: v1.0.6, v1.x Feb 12, 2025
@AkihiroSuda AkihiroSuda mentioned this pull request Apr 15, 2025
@afbjorklund afbjorklund force-pushed the almalinux-kitten branch 2 times, most recently from a0bc4ba to c462e79 Compare April 18, 2025 08:13
@afbjorklund
Copy link
Member Author

afbjorklund commented Apr 18, 2025

Still no cloud release of AlmaLinux 10, unfortunately. It was not included in the beta.

Compared to original PR, only added the new "s390x" architecture (but no riscv64 yet)

@AkihiroSuda
Copy link
Member

Could you squash the commits

Signed-off-by: Anders F Björklund <anders.f.bjorklund@gmail.com>
Most of the code is duplicated between AlmaLinux and
AlmaLinux Kitten, only the name and regexes differ.

Signed-off-by: Anders F Björklund <anders.f.bjorklund@gmail.com>
@afbjorklund
Copy link
Member Author

afbjorklund commented May 4, 2025

Could you squash the commits

Seems a bit excessive, no?

I did squash/rebase all the added architectures/templates/etc, and same with all failed versions of the update script

Copy link
Member

@AkihiroSuda AkihiroSuda left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks

@AkihiroSuda AkihiroSuda merged commit 875b723 into lima-vm:master May 4, 2025
53 of 55 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants