Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

amavisd-new and Google Header Analyzer say pass, but this plugin says Invalid #453

Open
Pascal666 opened this issue Jul 30, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels

Comments

@Pascal666
Copy link

I've been noticing lots of emails lately from various senders where this plugin will say the signature is Invalid, but amavisd-new and Google Header Analyzer both show pass.

Samples sent via email to lieser.

@lieser
Copy link
Owner

lieser commented Aug 13, 2024

Thanks for sending the samples to my mail.

I had a look at them using a different DKIM verifier (https://launchpad.net/dkimpy/) which came to the same conclusion as my add-on:
Invalid DKIM signature because the hash over the body is different from the one in the signature. So this is not an issue with the add-on, but the servers seems to modify the messages after it has done it's own DKIM verification.

I would suggest getting in contact with the admin of your server to investigate what is happening exactly. The used server (Postfix) should have some ways that could help in doing see, see e.g. https://www.mail-archive.com/postfix-users@postfix.org/msg102052.html (note that I don't have any experience doing that myself).

In case you are able to find the root cause it would be nice if you could write it here, so it can be added to https://github.com/lieser/dkim_verifier/wiki/FAQ#all-or-almost-all-e-mails-with-dkim-signature-are-failing-with-the-same-error.

As a workaround I would suggest enabling the reading of the Authentication-Results header, if you have not done so already.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants