Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Code coverage for lfd and lff too low #1881

Open
lhstrh opened this issue Jul 3, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

Code coverage for lfd and lff too low #1881

lhstrh opened this issue Jul 3, 2023 · 3 comments
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers help wanted Extra attention is needed testing

Comments

@lhstrh
Copy link
Member

lhstrh commented Jul 3, 2023

Currently, code coverage for lfd and lff is 39% and 60%, respectively. This needs to be improved.

@lhstrh lhstrh added testing help wanted Extra attention is needed good first issue Good for newcomers labels Jul 3, 2023
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jul 8, 2023

@lhstrh Can you assign this to me ?

@lhstrh lhstrh assigned ghost Jul 8, 2023
@lhstrh
Copy link
Member Author

lhstrh commented Jul 8, 2023

Let me know if you need any help, @areyeswhy. We can chat on Zulip if you like.

@cmnrd
Copy link
Collaborator

cmnrd commented Jul 10, 2023

I am not sure if there is much we can do about the lfd code coverage. We would somehow need to inject errors into the diagram synthesis to see if the error reporting works.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers help wanted Extra attention is needed testing
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants