Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Fix for 9 vulnerabilities #128

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

leonardoadame
Copy link
Owner

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


Snyk has created this PR to fix one or more vulnerable packages in the `npm` dependencies of this project.

Changes included in this PR

  • Changes to the following files to upgrade the vulnerable dependencies to a fixed version:
    • tools/node_modules/eslint/node_modules/@nicolo-ribaudo/eslint-scope-5-internals/node_modules/eslint-scope/package.json

Vulnerabilities that will be fixed

With an upgrade:
Severity Priority Score (*) Issue Breaking Change Exploit Maturity
medium severity 616/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 5.9
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
SNYK-JS-AXIOS-1038255
Yes Proof of Concept
high severity 696/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 7.5
Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
SNYK-JS-AXIOS-1579269
Yes Proof of Concept
medium severity 586/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 5.3
Denial of Service (DoS)
SNYK-JS-AXIOS-174505
Yes Proof of Concept
medium severity 586/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 5.3
Information Exposure
SNYK-JS-FOLLOWREDIRECTS-2332181
Yes Proof of Concept
low severity 344/1000
Why? Has a fix available, CVSS 2.6
Information Exposure
SNYK-JS-FOLLOWREDIRECTS-2396346
Yes No Known Exploit
medium severity 479/1000
Why? Has a fix available, CVSS 5.3
Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
SNYK-JS-MINIMATCH-3050818
Yes No Known Exploit
high severity 589/1000
Why? Has a fix available, CVSS 7.5
Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
SNYK-JS-MOCHA-2863123
Yes No Known Exploit
high severity 768/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Recently disclosed, Has a fix available, CVSS 7.5
Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
SNYK-JS-SEMVER-3247795
Yes Proof of Concept
high severity 676/1000
Why? Proof of Concept exploit, Has a fix available, CVSS 7.1
Improper Privilege Management
SNYK-JS-SHELLJS-2332187
Yes Proof of Concept

(*) Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.

Commit messages
Package name: @typescript-eslint/parser The new version differs by 250 commits.

See the full diff

Package name: eslint The new version differs by 210 commits.

See the full diff

Package name: eslint-release The new version differs by 6 commits.

See the full diff

Package name: mocha The new version differs by 250 commits.

See the full diff

Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust project settings

📚 Read more about Snyk's upgrade and patch logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
🦉 Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS)
🦉 Improper Privilege Management

@stackblitz
Copy link

stackblitz bot commented Jul 8, 2023

Review PR in StackBlitz Codeflow Run & review this pull request in StackBlitz Codeflow.

@changeset-bot
Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Jul 8, 2023

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: b843c45

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants