Correct InputAccessoryView's type #674
Conversation
InputAccessoryView takes a function returning a ReactNode, not a ReactNode.
📝 WalkthroughSummary by CodeRabbit
WalkthroughThe type definition for the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Consumer as Component Consumer
participant Picker as PickerSelect Component
Consumer->>Picker: Passes InputAccessoryView as a function
Picker->>Picker: Calls InputAccessoryView()
Picker->>Consumer: Renders returned React node
Note ⚡️ AI Code Reviews for VS Code, Cursor, WindsurfCodeRabbit now has a plugin for VS Code, Cursor and Windsurf. This brings AI code reviews directly in the code editor. Each commit is reviewed immediately, finding bugs before the PR is raised. Seamless context handoff to your AI code agent ensures that you can easily incorporate review feedback. Note ⚡️ Faster reviews with cachingCodeRabbit now supports caching for code and dependencies, helping speed up reviews. This means quicker feedback, reduced wait times, and a smoother review experience overall. Cached data is encrypted and stored securely. This feature will be automatically enabled for all accounts on May 16th. To opt out, configure ✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate Unit Tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
index.d.ts (1)
93-93: Consider adding JSDoc documentation for the InputAccessoryView prop.There's currently no documentation explaining the purpose and usage of this prop. Adding a JSDoc comment similar to other props in this interface would improve developer experience.
+ /** + * Function to render custom input accessory view + * This allows for custom UI elements to be rendered above the picker + */ InputAccessoryView?: () => React.ReactNode;
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
index.d.ts(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
`**/*.{js,jsx,ts,tsx}`: Review the TypeScript, React Native, and React code for conformity with best practices in React Native, React, and TypeScript.
For default values try to su...
**/*.{js,jsx,ts,tsx}: Review the TypeScript, React Native, and React code for conformity with best practices in React Native, React, and TypeScript.For default values try to suggest using constants instead of adding comments on code.
Check for accessibility and semantic code.
Translate with i18n where possible.
Check for common security vulnerabilities such as:
- XSS (Cross-Site Scripting)
- OWASP vulnerabilities
- Memory leaks
- Insecure dependencies
- Sensitive data exposure
index.d.ts
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Summary
🔇 Additional comments (2)
index.d.ts (2)
93-93: Good update to correct the type definition.The change from
React.ReactNodeto() => React.ReactNodecorrectly reflects that theInputAccessoryViewexpects a function returning a React node rather than a direct React node. This improves type safety and makes the API usage more clear.
93-93:✅ Verification successful
Verify breaking change implications.
This type change from
React.ReactNodeto() => React.ReactNodeis a breaking change. Ensure that all existing usages of this component have been updated accordingly and that the change is properly communicated in release notes.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Search for direct usage of InputAccessoryView prop rg -t js -t jsx -t ts -t tsx "InputAccessoryView=\{[^(]" --no-filenameLength of output: 100
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Search across the entire codebase for any JSX/TSX usages of the InputAccessoryView prop rg "InputAccessoryView=" -n -g "*.{js,jsx,ts,tsx}"Length of output: 111
InputAccessoryView prop usage verified
- A global search found a single usage in
test/test.js:119, already passing a function:InputAccessoryView={() => { … }}- No occurrences of
InputAccessoryViewreceiving a ReactNode directly were found.No code updates are required; please include this change in the release notes as a breaking change.
InputAccessoryView takes a function returning a ReactNode, not a ReactNode.