Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Test-publish to test PyPI and separate jobs to limit permissions. #12578

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 30, 2023

Conversation

obi1kenobi
Copy link
Collaborator

Before making a new langchain release, we want to test that everything works as expected. This PR lets us publish langchain to test PyPI, then install it from there and run checks to ensure everything works normally before publishing it "for real".

It also takes the opportunity to refactor the build process, splitting up the build, release-creation, and PyPI upload steps into separate jobs that do not share their elevated permissions with each other.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 30, 2023

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

1 Ignored Deployment
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
langchain ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Oct 30, 2023 6:39pm

@dosubot dosubot bot added the 🤖:improvement Medium size change to existing code to handle new use-cases label Oct 30, 2023
@obi1kenobi obi1kenobi merged commit 3c5c384 into master Oct 30, 2023
@obi1kenobi obi1kenobi deleted the pg/pre-publish-checks branch October 30, 2023 21:10
obi1kenobi added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 1, 2023
This follows the principle of least privilege. Our `poetry build` step
doesn't need, and shouldn't get, access to our GitHub OIDC capability.

This is the same structure as I used in the already-merged PR for
refactoring the regular PyPI release workflow: #12578.
xieqihui pushed a commit to xieqihui/langchain that referenced this pull request Nov 21, 2023
…ngchain-ai#12578)

Before making a new `langchain` release, we want to test that everything
works as expected. This PR lets us publish `langchain` to test PyPI,
then install it from there and run checks to ensure everything works
normally before publishing it "for real".

It also takes the opportunity to refactor the build process, splitting
up the build, release-creation, and PyPI upload steps into separate jobs
that do not share their elevated permissions with each other.
xieqihui pushed a commit to xieqihui/langchain that referenced this pull request Nov 21, 2023
…in-ai#12671)

This follows the principle of least privilege. Our `poetry build` step
doesn't need, and shouldn't get, access to our GitHub OIDC capability.

This is the same structure as I used in the already-merged PR for
refactoring the regular PyPI release workflow: langchain-ai#12578.
hoanq1811 pushed a commit to hoanq1811/langchain that referenced this pull request Feb 2, 2024
…ngchain-ai#12578)

Before making a new `langchain` release, we want to test that everything
works as expected. This PR lets us publish `langchain` to test PyPI,
then install it from there and run checks to ensure everything works
normally before publishing it "for real".

It also takes the opportunity to refactor the build process, splitting
up the build, release-creation, and PyPI upload steps into separate jobs
that do not share their elevated permissions with each other.
hoanq1811 pushed a commit to hoanq1811/langchain that referenced this pull request Feb 2, 2024
…in-ai#12671)

This follows the principle of least privilege. Our `poetry build` step
doesn't need, and shouldn't get, access to our GitHub OIDC capability.

This is the same structure as I used in the already-merged PR for
refactoring the regular PyPI release workflow: langchain-ai#12578.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🤖:improvement Medium size change to existing code to handle new use-cases
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants