You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I searched existing ideas and did not find a similar one
I added a very descriptive title
I've clearly described the feature request and motivation for it
Feature request
Currently, there is no support or documentation for using gemini-2.0-flash-001 with grounding in ChatGoogleGenerativeAI and ChatVertexAI. Adding this support would enable users to leverage grounded responses for more reliable and accurate AI interactions.
Motivation
The lack of grounding support for gemini-2.0-flash-001 in ChatGoogleGenerativeAI and ChatVertexAI limits its usability for applications requiring factually accurate responses. This can be frustrating when developing systems that rely on verified knowledge sources.
By adding support for grounding, users can enhance response reliability, improve factual correctness, and better integrate with external knowledge bases.
If this issue has already been discussed elsewhere, please link to relevant GitHub issues or discussions.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
Checked
Feature request
Currently, there is no support or documentation for using gemini-2.0-flash-001 with grounding in ChatGoogleGenerativeAI and ChatVertexAI. Adding this support would enable users to leverage grounded responses for more reliable and accurate AI interactions.
Motivation
The lack of grounding support for gemini-2.0-flash-001 in ChatGoogleGenerativeAI and ChatVertexAI limits its usability for applications requiring factually accurate responses. This can be frustrating when developing systems that rely on verified knowledge sources.
By adding support for grounding, users can enhance response reliability, improve factual correctness, and better integrate with external knowledge bases.
If this issue has already been discussed elsewhere, please link to relevant GitHub issues or discussions.
Proposal (If applicable)
No response
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions