Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New template for printing #313

Open
DamirGatin opened this issue Jul 14, 2021 · 9 comments
Open

New template for printing #313

DamirGatin opened this issue Jul 14, 2021 · 9 comments

Comments

@DamirGatin
Copy link

You can make such a template for printing: A landscape view with a list of parts on the right, so that the cutting and the list of parts are on the same A4 sheet?
image

@DamirGatin
Copy link
Author

The height of the rows of the table of the list of parts can be made smaller

@mobilarte
Copy link
Contributor

Hi Damir,

We will have a look at such an option, although it will probably not solve the problem of large cutting plans being split over multiple pages.

@DamirGatin
Copy link
Author

Hi! In the next issue, will the possibility of using such a template for printing be considered? Thanks!

@bbeaulant
Copy link
Member

Hi Damir,

Currently this feature is not planed.
The main problem of long part list table that require more than one page stay the same, no ?

Regards

@DamirGatin
Copy link
Author

2021-12-06_13-04-12
In our furniture program it is done like this. Cut it on one sheet. But there are some inconveniences there. Everything is convenient in your plugin, but there is no such format for printing.)

@bbeaulant
Copy link
Member

Thank for this screenshot.
And how how does this software render list if it is longer (with more part than paper height can contains) ?

@DamirGatin
Copy link
Author

2021-12-06_13-18-47

@DamirGatin
Copy link
Author

1.pdf

@DamirGatin
Copy link
Author

it seems to change the scale

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: No status
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants