Update process and release team handbooks handbooks on Major Themes #2393
Labels
kind/feature
Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature.
lifecycle/rotten
Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.
priority/important-longterm
Important over the long term, but may not be staffed and/or may need multiple releases to complete.
The current process, as documented in the handbooks, is broadly like this:
What's New (Major Themes)
section in the release notesIn reality, 1.25 was the last release in which the release notes included a
Major Themes
section, for reasons that were discussed and approved by the release teams at each subsequent release, but the process was never updated: this leads to a confusing situation in which the release notes team is responsible for collecting information that it will not use, and Comms also goes after SIGs for content.In the 1.29 release, we re-added the
Major Themes
section, but with a simple paragraph that mentions the release name and links to the release article, avoiding duplicating content.Assuming that this approach is adequate, we need to update the handbooks (namely, the Release Notes and the Comms handbooks) to reflect this. If it isn't adequate, we should identify an alternative that is consistent across teams.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: