-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ignore docker rmi fail with container image used by running container #17805
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
ignore docker rmi fail with container image used by running container #17805
Conversation
…ainer Signed-off-by: Zhou Zhiqiang <im@strrl.dev>
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: STRRL The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Welcome @STRRL! |
Hi @STRRL. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
How do I resolve |
Can one of the admins verify this patch? |
@STRRL Could you add reproduction steps? I haven't been able to reproduce the error |
@@ -329,6 +329,11 @@ func removeExistingImage(r cruntime.Manager, src string, imgName string) error { | |||
} | |||
|
|||
errStr := strings.ToLower(err.Error()) | |||
if strings.Contains(errStr, "is using its referenced image") { | |||
klog.Warningf("Image %s is being used by a running container, skipping deletion, it would be replaced later", imgName) | |||
return nil |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can you explain why would we wanna return nil ? and not return an error ?
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all PRs. This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough active contributors to adequately respond to all PRs. This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle rotten |
/remove-lifecycle rotten |
PR needs rebase. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all PRs. This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
fix #16032
I noticed that #16032 could only be reproduced with docker as container runtime.
Because behaviors of "deleting container image which still used by running container" are different
docker
andcrictl
:docker
would be fail to deleted it, with the message likeError response from daemon: conflict: unable to remove repository reference "nginx:target" (must force) - container f5abe3488a83 is using its referenced image a6bd71f48f68
crictl
would be succeed to untag the container image directly.So this PR just ignore errors which contains
is using its referenced image
.