-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 716
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
RFE: Document the kubeadm roadmap #2315
Comments
Create the kubeadm library #2316 |
Improve kubeadm support for declarative approaches/git-ops #2317 |
Improve kubeadm support for pluggable addons / operator driven addons #2318 |
Support node-specific configurations #2367 |
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. |
/remove-lifecycle stale |
We have seen user requests for kubeadm to allow node-role labels. There was a k/k issue too but i cannot find it. This is something the operator can support: |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues and PRs. This bot triages issues and PRs according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
/lifecycle frozen This is an issue for tracking other issues, I'm not sure "activity" is the right metric for closing this. |
Kubeadm was created in 2016 and then graduated GA in 2018, and, In order to continue to provide the best user experience to our users, we should start drafting a new roadmap for defining.
This issues should act as a focal point for collecting items to be included in this roadmap; each item should be discussed in a separated issue, and linked here for visibility
-- note from kubeadm office hours 09-30-2020
This list does not express a commitment to implement a feature nor implementation priorities.
As stated above, item are linked here for visibility, but each issue should be discussed separately.
As soon as we will be ready, we will create a roadmapa.md document, documenting maintainers' agreement on the relevance of a selected list of issues/topics for the future of kubeadm.
Implementation priorities will be discussed as usual in the planning session/office hours meetings according to the availability of people willing to work on each issue/topic.
Implementation details will be defined in KEPs, if required, on directly on each issue.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: