-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 154
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Onboarding doesn't explain how to identify a SIG/AREA/WG/Committee for an issue/PR #462
Comments
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues. This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
/remove-lifecycle stale |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues. This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
/remove-lifecycle stale |
The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues. This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:
You can:
Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. /lifecycle stale |
/remove-lifecycle stale |
I've just spent some time browsing https://www.kubernetes.dev/docs/onboarding/ and I don't think it was remotely helpful.
Nothing in any of this content gives any hint to anyone as to how to identify a SIG or AREA or a working group or a committee for that matter for an issue or a PR for https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/ .
Nothing in it explains that if you make a PR, a bot might automatically suggest the proper something. And really, nothing suggests a way to figure out how the bot determines the right answer so you could do the same for an issue in case you've identified the precise file but don't have code ready to fix the issue. (Or are justifiably intimidated by the bots.)q
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: