-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.2k
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Merge pull request #207 from verb/sharedpid-rollout
Propose rollout for Docker shared PID namespace
- Loading branch information
Showing
2 changed files
with
78 additions
and
1 deletion.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@ | ||
# Shared PID Namespace | ||
|
||
Pods share namespaces where possible, but a requirement for sharing the PID | ||
namespace has not been defined due to lack of support in Docker. Docker began | ||
supporting a shared PID namespace in 1.12, and other Kubernetes runtimes (rkt, | ||
cri-o, hyper) have already implemented a shared PID namespace. | ||
|
||
This proposal defines a shared PID namespace as a requirement of the Container | ||
Runtime Interface and links its rollout in Docker to that of the CRI. | ||
|
||
## Motivation | ||
|
||
Sharing a PID namespace between containers in a pod is discussed in | ||
[#1615](https://issues.k8s.io/1615), and enables: | ||
|
||
1. signaling between containers, which is useful for side cars (e.g. for | ||
signaling a daemon process after rotating logs). | ||
2. easier troubleshooting of pods. | ||
3. addressing [Docker's zombie problem][1] by reaping orphaned zombies in the | ||
infra container. | ||
|
||
## Goals and Non-Goals | ||
|
||
Goals include: | ||
- Changing default behavior in the Docker runtime as implemented by the CRI | ||
- Making Docker behavior compatible with the other Kubernetes runtimes | ||
|
||
Non-goals include: | ||
- Creating an init solution that works for all runtimes | ||
- Supporting isolated PID namespace indefinitely | ||
|
||
## Modification to the Docker Runtime | ||
|
||
We will modify the Docker implementation of the CRI to use a shared PID | ||
namespace when running with a version of Docker >= 1.12. The legacy | ||
`dockertools` implementation will not be changed. | ||
|
||
Linking this change to the CRI means that Kubernetes users who care to test such | ||
changes can test the combined changes at once. Users who do not care to test | ||
such changes will be insulated by Kubernetes not recommending Docker >= 1.12 | ||
until after switching to the CRI. | ||
|
||
Other changes that must be made to support this change: | ||
|
||
1. Add a test to verify all containers restart if the infra container | ||
responsible for the PodSandbox dies. (Note: With Docker 1.12 if the source | ||
of the PID namespace dies all containers sharing that namespace are killed | ||
as well.) | ||
2. Modify the Infra container used by the Docker runtime to reap orphaned | ||
zombies ([#36853](https://pr.k8s.io/36853)). | ||
|
||
## Rollout Plan | ||
|
||
SIG Node is planning to switch to the CRI as a default in 1.6, at which point | ||
users with Docker >= 1.12 will receive a shared PID namespace by default. | ||
Cluster administrators will be able to disable this behavior by providing a flag | ||
to the kubelet which will cause the dockershim to revert to previous behavior. | ||
|
||
The ability to disable shared PID namespaces is intended as a way to roll back | ||
to prior behavior in the event of unforeseen problems. It won't be possible to | ||
configure the behavior per-pod. We believe this is acceptable because: | ||
|
||
* We have not identified a concrete use case requiring isolated PID namespaces. | ||
* Making PID namespace configurable requires changing the CRI, which we would | ||
like to avoid since there are no use cases. | ||
|
||
In a future release, SIG Node will recommend docker >= 1.12. Unless a compelling | ||
use case for isolated PID namespaces is discovered, we will remove the ability | ||
to disable the shared PID namespace in the subsequent release. | ||
|
||
|
||
[1]: https://blog.phusion.nl/2015/01/20/docker-and-the-pid-1-zombie-reaping-problem/ | ||
|
||
|
||
<!-- BEGIN MUNGE: GENERATED_ANALYTICS --> | ||
[![Analytics](https://kubernetes-site.appspot.com/UA-36037335-10/GitHub/docs/proposals/pod-pid-namespace.md?pixel)]() | ||
<!-- END MUNGE: GENERATED_ANALYTICS --> |