Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test/e2e: use vSphere projects from Boskos #1067

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 12, 2024

Conversation

sbueringer
Copy link
Member

Signed-off-by: Stefan Büringer buringerst@vmware.com

What this PR does / why we need it:
For context see: kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-vsphere#3034

Which issue this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close that issue when PR gets merged): fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Release note:

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Jun 7, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jun 7, 2024
hack/e2e.sh Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jun 7, 2024
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

cc @chrischdi @fabriziopandini
(this is atm a POC to see if everything works in CPI as well)

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

/test ?

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@sbueringer: The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

  • /test pull-cloud-provider-vsphere-build
  • /test pull-cloud-provider-vsphere-coverage
  • /test pull-cloud-provider-vsphere-integration-test
  • /test pull-cloud-provider-vsphere-unit-test
  • /test pull-cloud-provider-vsphere-verify-fmt
  • /test pull-cloud-provider-vsphere-verify-lint
  • /test pull-cloud-provider-vsphere-verify-markdown
  • /test pull-cloud-provider-vsphere-verify-shell
  • /test pull-cloud-provider-vsphere-verify-staticcheck
  • /test pull-cloud-provider-vsphere-verify-vet

The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:

  • /test pull-cloud-provider-vsphere-e2e-test
  • /test pull-cloud-provider-vsphere-e2e-test-on-latest-k8s-version

Use /test all to run the following jobs that were automatically triggered:

  • pull-cloud-provider-vsphere-coverage
  • pull-cloud-provider-vsphere-e2e-test
  • pull-cloud-provider-vsphere-e2e-test-on-latest-k8s-version
  • pull-cloud-provider-vsphere-verify-shell

In response to this:

/test ?

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-cloud-provider-vsphere-e2e-test
/test pull-cloud-provider-vsphere-e2e-test-on-latest-k8s-version

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-cloud-provider-vsphere-e2e-test
/test pull-cloud-provider-vsphere-e2e-test-on-latest-k8s-version

(forgot to change the network)

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

sbueringer commented Jun 7, 2024

/assign @fabriziopandini @chrischdi @XudongLiuHarold

Ready for review :)

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-cloud-provider-vsphere-e2e-test
/test pull-cloud-provider-vsphere-e2e-test-on-latest-k8s-version

hack/e2e.sh Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-cloud-provider-vsphere-e2e-test
/test pull-cloud-provider-vsphere-e2e-test-on-latest-k8s-version

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

/hold
only until kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-vsphere#3034 is merged

/assign @lubronzhan @XudongLiuHarold
Please take a look already, so we can merge once the CAPV PR is merged.

Please let me know if you need more information than is provided on the linked issues

/assign @fabriziopandini @chrischdi

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-cloud-provider-vsphere-e2e-test
/test pull-cloud-provider-vsphere-e2e-test-on-latest-k8s-version

Signed-off-by: Stefan Büringer buringerst@vmware.com
Copy link
Member

@XudongLiuHarold XudongLiuHarold left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

generally looks great, thanks @sbueringer !

We might want to change this docker image: gcr.io/k8s-staging-capi-vsphere/extra/boskosctl:latest to cloud-provider-vsphere registry to avoid more coupling with capv, but I can do that in a follow-up PR once I pushed this image.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 11, 2024
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

We might want to change this docker image: gcr.io/k8s-staging-capi-vsphere/extra/boskosctl:latest to cloud-provider-vsphere registry to avoid more coupling with capv, but I can do that in a follow-up PR once I pushed this image.

I would prefer to use the same image as we use in CAPV. That allows us - as CAPV maintainers - to easily maintain the vSphere environment for CAPV, image-builder and cloud-provider-vsphere.

@chrischdi
Copy link
Member

/test pull-cloud-provider-vsphere-e2e-test
/test pull-cloud-provider-vsphere-e2e-test-on-latest-k8s-version

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

sbueringer commented Jun 11, 2024

@XudongLiuHarold @lubronzhan
Can we get an approval for this PR? :) Thank you!

Please also put this on the list of PRs that have to be backported to all branches for which you still want to run CI
(let us know if you run into any problems with the cherry-picks)

(like: #1063)

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-cloud-provider-vsphere-e2e-test
/test pull-cloud-provider-vsphere-e2e-test-on-latest-k8s-version

@chrischdi
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

Copy link
Member

@XudongLiuHarold XudongLiuHarold left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

/approve

Thanks @sbueringer !

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: sbueringer, XudongLiuHarold

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 12, 2024
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

/hold cancel

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jun 12, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit a4f25ef into kubernetes:master Jun 12, 2024
10 checks passed
@sbueringer sbueringer deleted the pr-boskos branch June 12, 2024 06:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants