-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 321
feat: Use RequiresRepublish for secret rotation #1622
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
Hi @dargudear-google. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
amitmodak
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Approach broadly LGTM! IIUC, once this PR is submitted, auto-rotation won't work for k8s clusters < 1.21. What is the process to announce and manage this breaking change?
Discussed in the last community call that we should publish that "For clusters < 1.21, please use v.1.4.5 or earlier." |
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1622 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 35.83% 32.07% -3.77%
==========================================
Files 63 57 -6
Lines 3759 3838 +79
==========================================
- Hits 1347 1231 -116
- Misses 2268 2501 +233
+ Partials 144 106 -38 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
/ok-to-test |
aa6ffcb to
8d332b7
Compare
nilekhc
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
First pass.
In bats tests, where sleep duration/timeout is increased, could you re-evaluate if it's necessary? If yes then could you add a note to make sure we have context?
|
@dargudear-google is this PR still active? I see it is out of date with no changes in a month |
|
@dargudear-google could you rebase the PR when you get a chance? I'll do another round of review this week for the metrics + rotation changes and if all looks good, we'll plan this for the v1.6.0 release along with other feature PRs. |
Done |
Yes, rebased and resolved the issues. |
aramase
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is close.
|
/label tide/merge-method-squash |
dada872 to
264971b
Compare
3dd461f to
c4f3a8e
Compare
c4f3a8e to
5973ccc
Compare
|
@dargudear-google: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
/test pull-secrets-store-csi-driver-e2e-windows |
Remove the rotation controller and rely exclusively on RequiresRepublish for secret rotation.