Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Spike: Is it possible to promote images that weren't built by a Google Cloud Build #1128

Open
9 tasks
LappleApple opened this issue Dec 8, 2023 · 6 comments
Open
9 tasks

Comments

@LappleApple
Copy link

LappleApple commented Dec 8, 2023

Objective

  • SIG reaches a decision based on data that shows what's realistic.
  • In the future, SIG uses this decision to plan future work.

Tasks to achieve the objective

By 1-3 contributors:

  • What problem do we currently have with Google Cloud Build? Security, etc.?
  • Do research on the topic
  • Collect and answer additional questions as part of your research phase
  • Prepare a brief (1-2 pages max) proposal evaluating pros, cons, and tradeoffs
  • Share proposal with SIG (mailing list, Slack thread, at community meeting)

By the SIG/group:

  • SIG members provide input on findings/raise questions
  • After a timeboxed review period (to be determined), SIG members regroup to make a decision
  • Log decision for community awareness
  • Plan next steps

Context and things to think about while working on this task

  • This relates to potential work to make the image promoter less monolithic
  • It specifically relates to the step, "Changes images.yaml for image in github.com/kubernetes/k8s.io"

Image

Image

@LappleApple LappleApple changed the title Achieve Decision: Promoting images that weren't built by a Google Cloud Build Achieve Decision: On promoting images that weren't built by a Google Cloud Build Dec 8, 2023
@LappleApple LappleApple changed the title Achieve Decision: On promoting images that weren't built by a Google Cloud Build Spike: Is it possible to promote images that weren't built by a Google Cloud Build Dec 18, 2023
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Mar 17, 2024
@xmudrii
Copy link
Member

xmudrii commented Mar 17, 2024

/remove-lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Mar 17, 2024
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jun 15, 2024
@xmudrii
Copy link
Member

xmudrii commented Jun 17, 2024

/remove-lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Jun 17, 2024
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all issues.

This bot triages un-triaged issues according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the issue is closed

You can:

  • Mark this issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this issue with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Sep 15, 2024
@xmudrii
Copy link
Member

xmudrii commented Sep 17, 2024

/remove-lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Sep 17, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants