-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 245
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Status to NodeFeature CRD #1664
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Hi @ozhuraki. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: ozhuraki The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
✅ Deploy Preview for kubernetes-sigs-nfd ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for your work @ozhuraki. I actually think that we can store other useful information in the worker NFR status, rather than only updated at, like number of features/labels discovered, number of sources that had failures when doing discovery. I don't have concrete use cases here but this is my opinion for now.
Thanks for the input. Updated, please take a look. |
Thanks for the review, updated, please take a look. |
@PiotrProkop |
@ozhuraki Are you planning to add some e2e tests for this feature? I think they're important in this use case. |
@TessaIO |
Thanks, added e2e tests, please take a look. |
Thanks! Updated, please take a look |
@ozhuraki could you rebase, sorry it took me so long, I have been swamped by other stuff |
Sorry for a delay, missed your coments and thanks for the input. Converted status to a subresource, please take a look. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/ok-to-test
Signed-off-by: Oleg Zhurakivskyy <oleg.zhurakivskyy@intel.com>
/retest |
1 similar comment
/retest |
@ozhuraki: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
PR needs rebase. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
Closes #1071