Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

configMapGenerator should accept existing ConfigMap as input #5759

Open
1 of 2 tasks
siom79 opened this issue Sep 6, 2024 · 1 comment
Open
1 of 2 tasks

configMapGenerator should accept existing ConfigMap as input #5759

siom79 opened this issue Sep 6, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one.

Comments

@siom79
Copy link

siom79 commented Sep 6, 2024

Eschewed features

  • This issue is not requesting templating, unstuctured edits, build-time side-effects from args or env vars, or any other eschewed feature.

What would you like to have added?

The configMapGenerator appends to the name of the generated ConfigMap a hash value that allows restarting the containers that actually use this ConfigMap when used together with GitOps tools like ArgoCD.

Why is this needed?

Enhance the existing functionality of the configMapGenerator such that it additionally accepts an existing ConfigMap.``

Can you accomplish the motivating task without this feature, and if so, how?

Currently properties files and env files are supported but not existing ConfigMaps.

In my setup I have a large existing ConfigMap that I do not want to convert into a properties or env file, but I want that the configMapGenerator appends the hash.

What other solutions have you considered?

Converting the large ConfigMap into properties files. :wea

Anything else we should know?

No response

Feature ownership

  • I am interested in contributing this feature myself! 🎉
@siom79 siom79 added the kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. label Sep 6, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. label Sep 6, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

This issue is currently awaiting triage.

SIG CLI takes a lead on issue triage for this repo, but any Kubernetes member can accept issues by applying the triage/accepted label.

The triage/accepted label can be added by org members by writing /triage accepted in a comment.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants