Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: specify owner to kube_owner in task of copy cni plugins #10407

Conversation

NierYYDS
Copy link
Contributor

@NierYYDS NierYYDS commented Sep 2, 2023

What type of PR is this?

/kind bug

What this PR does / why we need it:
Every time I run scale.yml, the following tasks always shows changed.

TASK [network_plugin/cni : CNI | make sure /opt/cni/bin exists] ****************************************************************************************************************************************************************************
changed: [k8s-cp-01]
changed: [k8s-cp-03]
changed: [k8s-cp-02]
Saturday 02 September 2023  09:08:11 +0000 (0:00:01.805)       0:16:12.735 ****

TASK [network_plugin/cni : CNI | Copy cni plugins] *****************************************************************************************************************************************************************************************
changed: [k8s-cp-03]
changed: [k8s-cp-02]
changed: [k8s-cp-01]

Task of Copy cni plugins did not set owner to {{ kube_owner }} in unarchive module, so the owner of /opt/cni/bin will be changed to root, which is inconsistent with the previous task.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

Fix specify owner to kube_owner in task of copy cni plugins

if not set owner to kube_owner in unarchive module, the owner of /opt/cni/bin will changed to root, which is inconsistent with the previous task.
@linux-foundation-easycla
Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented Sep 2, 2023

CLA Signed

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. label Sep 2, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @NierYYDS!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/kubespray 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/kubespray has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Sep 2, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @NierYYDS. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Sep 2, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels Sep 2, 2023
@yankay
Copy link
Member

yankay commented Sep 4, 2023

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Sep 4, 2023
@yankay
Copy link
Member

yankay commented Sep 4, 2023

Thanks @NierYYDS

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 4, 2023
Copy link
Member

@floryut floryut left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@NierYYDS Thank you for the PR 👍

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: floryut, NierYYDS

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 4, 2023
@floryut floryut added the kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. label Sep 4, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 8fef156 into kubernetes-sigs:master Sep 4, 2023
59 checks passed
@yankay yankay mentioned this pull request Sep 7, 2023
guytet pushed a commit to guytet/kubespray that referenced this pull request Oct 30, 2023
…tes-sigs#10407)

if not set owner to kube_owner in unarchive module, the owner of /opt/cni/bin will changed to root, which is inconsistent with the previous task.
pedro-peter pushed a commit to pedro-peter/kubespray that referenced this pull request May 8, 2024
…tes-sigs#10407)

if not set owner to kube_owner in unarchive module, the owner of /opt/cni/bin will changed to root, which is inconsistent with the previous task.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants