Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🐛 (go/v4): Fix path configuration for webhook markers generated for core types with non-"core" group values #4301

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 8, 2024

Conversation

damsien
Copy link
Contributor

@damsien damsien commented Nov 7, 2024

This PR is related to this issue: #4300. I added one more check on resources that belongs to a group even if they are considered to be part of the core type.

So kubebuilder create webhook --group apps --version v1 --kind Deployment --programmatic-validation will generate:

// +kubebuilder:webhook:path=/validate-apps-v1-deployment,...

And kubebuilder create webhook --group core --version v1 --kind Pod --programmatic-validation will generate:

// +kubebuilder:webhook:path=/validate--v1-pod,...

as expected.

We already discussed about the double dash -- for the core group in the linked issue.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Nov 7, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @damsien. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@damsien damsien changed the title 🐛 Fix webhook core path scaffold bug 🐛 Fix wrong webhook core path scaffold generation Nov 7, 2024
Copy link
Member

@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @damsien

Thank you for push the fix.
That is great 🥇

Can you please run make generate ?

We need to run this command for all prs, so that it will update the samples under testdata and under the docs with your changes.

Also, please ensure that those changes are committed and squashed.
We need to have one commit per PR.

@damsien
Copy link
Contributor Author

damsien commented Nov 7, 2024

I already ran make generate but it did not change anything in the testdata and the books folders since it is a very specific fix that create the annotation in very particular usecase.

I try again to make it works well

@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Member

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Nov 7, 2024
@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Member

camilamacedo86 commented Nov 7, 2024

Hi @damsien

See that we have the script to generate all that is under testdata: https://github.com/kubernetes-sigs/kubebuilder/blob/master/test/testdata/generate.sh

Then, see that we test things out by scaffolding an webhook for Core Type here:

However, both are using Group "core" and Kind Pod
Can you add a new scaffold to generate a webhook for your case scenario? Group apps Kind Deployments so that we can check its result?

Please, add the command to generate:

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Nov 7, 2024
@damsien
Copy link
Contributor Author

damsien commented Nov 7, 2024

Done ✔️

@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 changed the title 🐛 Fix wrong webhook core path scaffold generation 🐛 Fix path configuration for webhook markers generated for core types with non-"core" group values Nov 8, 2024
@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Member

/approved
/lgtm

Thank you a lot for your contribution 🥇

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 8, 2024
@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 changed the title 🐛 Fix path configuration for webhook markers generated for core types with non-"core" group values 🐛 (go/v4): Fix path configuration for webhook markers generated for core types with non-"core" group values Nov 8, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: camilamacedo86, damsien

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 8, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 02653c3 into kubernetes-sigs:master Nov 8, 2024
23 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants