Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Compare experience – UX changes #117

Closed
ajayalfred opened this issue Nov 7, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed

Compare experience – UX changes #117

ajayalfred opened this issue Nov 7, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@ajayalfred
Copy link
Contributor

  1. Rows selected for comparison should not display selection styling in the 'Overview' section. The checkboxes remain active and rows aren't highlighted. See below for row styling.

screen shot 2018-11-06 at 6 56 15 pm

  1. Run overview section cannot be collapsed. Remove collapse action.

  2. Parameters section table style below. Run (objects) are shown as rows, and parameters (attributes) are shown as columns. Match table font style with 'Overview' table (Roboto, 14px, for cell content)

screen shot 2018-11-06 at 6 55 04 pm

  1. Metrics is to be its own section and not part of overview section

screen shot 2018-11-06 at 6 58 42 pm

  1. Title of the aggregate view should read "All selected runs"

  2. Vertical top-align all charts in a section

@rileyjbauer
Copy link
Contributor

rileyjbauer commented Jun 3, 2019

4 was partly completed by #1284

@rileyjbauer
Copy link
Contributor

Closing in favor of #322

Linchin pushed a commit to Linchin/pipelines that referenced this issue Apr 11, 2023
HumairAK referenced this issue in red-hat-data-services/data-science-pipelines Mar 11, 2024
* re-arrange slip-coin example

* fix typo

* address comments

* address comments
HumairAK referenced this issue in red-hat-data-services/data-science-pipelines Mar 11, 2024
chore: Added amadhusu as Reviewer
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants