-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 220
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Archive inactive Kubeflow repos #479
Comments
@animeshsingh @Bobgy please list the repos to archive when you are ready |
Not sure about fairing, @jinchihe said he wanted to keep maintaining it. Currently, WGs are paused for expansion of scope. So shall we reconsider that later |
https://github.com/kubeflow/kubebench |
https://github.com/kubeflow/frontend |
cc @xyhuang |
https://github.com/kubeflow/chainer-operator Is it ready to archive? |
I am not sure about https://github.com/kubeflow/fate-operator. @gaocegege @jiahaoc1993 @LaynePeng Is this project still active? @thesuperzapper Please archiving instead of deleting. We should never delete a repo. |
The the ones I propose to delete are either forks (with no actual commits from us), or effectively empty repos. |
What about this one? https://github.com/kubeflow/frontend Even though the content will be moved to another repo, there can be lessons learned from history/discussions as well as people's contributions/commits in the past. |
yes, it still active. And it is supporting the latest FATE. Furthermore, we are planning a big refactoring.
Sent from iPhone
在 2021年3月3日,下午9:46,Yuan Tang <notifications@github.com> 写道:
I am not sure about https://github.com/kubeflow/fate-operator. @gaocegege<https://github.com/gaocegege> @jiahaoc1993<https://github.com/jiahaoc1993> @LaynePeng<https://github.com/LaynePeng> Is this project still active?
@thesuperzapper<https://github.com/thesuperzapper> Please archiving instead of deleting. We should never delete a repo.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#479 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAMRRELLOFSJ724RNWD54OLTBY4TXANCNFSM4XVON4CQ>.
|
https://github.com/kubeflow/fate-operator is active, please keep it. |
https://github.com/kubeflow/frontend Should be archived, there were real work there |
personally I suggest keep Fairing, that's used and active. Thanks. @Bobgy |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
@Bobgy the fastpages (https://github.com/kubeflow/fastpages) was set-up to help people post to blog.kubeflow.org. I think we might keep it. |
@jbottum I don't think we need it anymore. The new repo for blog is in https://github.com/kubeflow/blog now. |
@Bobgy ok, the newer repo looks good. I agree. |
@Bobgy Any plan to follow up and archive some of the inactive repositories like kubeflow/code-intelligence? |
https://github.com/kubeflow/kfp-tekton-backend can be archived since we migrated that repo to kfp-tekton already. |
https://github.com/kubeflow/frontend is ready for archive |
Hello everyone, I am targeting Nov 30th 2021 for archiving the repos mentioned in #479 (comment), as well as the deletion of repos in the same comment. Please let me know if:
Thank you so much! |
@zijianjoy The Training WG has added archival notice and decided to archive operator repos for PyTorch, XGBoost, and MXNet. Could you archive these repos as well? Thanks. See context in kubeflow/training-operator#1423 |
Hello @terrytangyuan , sounds good to me for archiving XGBoost, MXNet, PyTorch operators repos. |
Hi, @Bobgy. sorry for the late response. https://github.com/kubeflow/chainer-operator is not maintained actively anymore. please go archive it. |
Hello @everpeace, would you like to put on deprecation notice on README.md file for chainer-operator using format https://github.com/kubeflow/metadata#warning-kubeflowmetadata-is-not-maintained, and suggest an alternative for this tool? Please let me know once you have added this notice, thank you! |
@zijianjoy I added a deprecation notice on chainer-operator repo. |
@everpeace Thank you! I have added chainer-operator repo to archive list |
Notification has been sent to kubeflow-discuss email list: https://groups.google.com/g/kubeflow-discuss/c/GZw4LsPfrcY |
Thank you! @zijianjoy |
Hello everyone, Quick update that I will be taking the action to deprecate inactive repos today. Archive:
Delete: |
Update: The deprecation is finished. Thank you everyone for your help. |
Thank you for driving this! |
🎉 |
Thanks James!
…On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 9:00 PM Mathew Wicks ***@***.***> wrote:
🎉
—
You are receiving this because you are on a team that was mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#479 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABREJVKB3GDLADYHGKUUXKTUO34NRANCNFSM4XVON4CQ>
.
|
There are multiple repos in the Kubeflow github organization where no code is being checked in. We shall identify and archive and/or move those repos. I will follow up with a subset of the list, and then we can expand from there.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: