You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: products/court/answers-to-common-criticism.md
+3-1Lines changed: 3 additions & 1 deletion
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ This usually leads to some critics saying that one of the parties with much grea
51
51
52
52
People are thus incentivized to look at current appealed cases to spot obvious incorrect rulings and help crowdfund the other side to earn all or part of the rewards. This has been proven effective to deter "rich" parties from trying to win just by appealing several times. Learn more about it [here](https://blog.kleros.io/kleros-decentralized-token-listing-appeal-fees/).
53
53
54
-
### FUD \#7 - How can you expect fairness from a court that is controlled by a bunch of rich whales?
54
+
### FUD \#7 - How can I expect fairness from a court where whales have staked a lot of PNK?
55
55
56
56
### FUD \#8 - Can't someone just buy a lot of Kleros tokens and 51% attack the Kleros Court?
57
57
@@ -79,5 +79,7 @@ More details [here](https://kleros.gitbook.io/docs/pnk-token).
79
79
80
80
“Game theory is just a basic simplification of real life, therefore Kleros is broken"
0 commit comments