Skip to content

libbpf: Remove unnecessary conversion to bool #302

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

libbpf: Remove unnecessary conversion to bool #302

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

kernel-patches-bot
Copy link

Pull request for series with
subject: libbpf: Remove unnecessary conversion to bool
version: 1
url: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=378773

@kernel-patches-bot
Copy link
Author

Master branch: c6bde95
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=378773
version: 1

@kernel-patches-bot
Copy link
Author

Master branch: 4170bc6
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=378773
version: 1

kernel-patches-bot and others added 2 commits November 6, 2020 12:40
@kernel-patches-bot
adding ci files
7ed8d57
@kaixuxiakx @kernel-patches-bot
libbpf: Remove unnecessary conversion to bool
baf4bca 
Fix following warning from coccinelle:

./tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c:1478:43-48: WARNING: conversion to bool not needed here

Signed-off-by: Kaixu Xia <kaixuxia@tencent.com>
@kernel-patches-bot
Copy link
Author

Master branch: f055f35
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=378773
version: 1

@kernel-patches-bot
Copy link
Author

At least one diff in series https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=378773 expired. Closing PR.

@kernel-patches-bot kernel-patches-bot deleted the series/378773=>bpf-next branch November 10, 2020 22:15
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 18, 2023
@borkmann
selftests/bpf: Enable cpu v4 tests for arm64
5f6395f 
Enable CPU v4 instruction tests for arm64. Below are the test results from
BPF test_progs selftests:

  # ./test_progs -t ldsx_insn,verifier_sdiv,verifier_movsx,verifier_ldsx,verifier_gotol,verifier_bswap
  #115/1   ldsx_insn/map_val and probed_memory:OK
  #115/2   ldsx_insn/ctx_member_sign_ext:OK
  #115/3   ldsx_insn/ctx_member_narrow_sign_ext:OK
  #115     ldsx_insn:OK
  #302/1   verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 16:OK
  #302/2   verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 16 @unpriv:OK
  #302/3   verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 32:OK
  #302/4   verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 32 @unpriv:OK
  #302/5   verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 64:OK
  #302/6   verifier_bswap/BSWAP, 64 @unpriv:OK
  #302     verifier_bswap:OK
  #316/1   verifier_gotol/gotol, small_imm:OK
  #316/2   verifier_gotol/gotol, small_imm @unpriv:OK
  #316     verifier_gotol:OK
  #324/1   verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S8:OK
  #324/2   verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S8 @unpriv:OK
  #324/3   verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S16:OK
  #324/4   verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S16 @unpriv:OK
  #324/5   verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S32:OK
  #324/6   verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S32 @unpriv:OK
  #324/7   verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S8 range checking, privileged:OK
  #324/8   verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S16 range checking:OK
  #324/9   verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S16 range checking @unpriv:OK
  #324/10  verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S32 range checking:OK
  #324/11  verifier_ldsx/LDSX, S32 range checking @unpriv:OK
  #324     verifier_ldsx:OK
  #335/1   verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S8:OK
  #335/2   verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S8 @unpriv:OK
  #335/3   verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16:OK
  #335/4   verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16 @unpriv:OK
  #335/5   verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S8:OK
  #335/6   verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S8 @unpriv:OK
  #335/7   verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16:OK
  #335/8   verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16 @unpriv:OK
  #335/9   verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S32:OK
  #335/10  verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S32 @unpriv:OK
  #335/11  verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S8, range_check:OK
  #335/12  verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S8, range_check @unpriv:OK
  #335/13  verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16, range_check:OK
  #335/14  verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16, range_check @unpriv:OK
  #335/15  verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16, range_check 2:OK
  #335/16  verifier_movsx/MOV32SX, S16, range_check 2 @unpriv:OK
  #335/17  verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S8, range_check:OK
  #335/18  verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S8, range_check @unpriv:OK
  #335/19  verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16, range_check:OK
  #335/20  verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16, range_check @unpriv:OK
  #335/21  verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S32, range_check:OK
  #335/22  verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S32, range_check @unpriv:OK
  #335/23  verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16, R10 Sign Extension:OK
  #335/24  verifier_movsx/MOV64SX, S16, R10 Sign Extension @unpriv:OK
  #335     verifier_movsx:OK
  #347/1   verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 1:OK
  #347/2   verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK
  #347/3   verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 2:OK
  #347/4   verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK
  #347/5   verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 3:OK
  #347/6   verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK
  #347/7   verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 4:OK
  #347/8   verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK
  #347/9   verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 5:OK
  #347/10  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK
  #347/11  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 6:OK
  #347/12  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK
  #347/13  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 7:OK
  #347/14  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 7 @unpriv:OK
  #347/15  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 8:OK
  #347/16  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero imm divisor, check 8 @unpriv:OK
  #347/17  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 1:OK
  #347/18  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK
  #347/19  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 2:OK
  #347/20  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK
  #347/21  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 3:OK
  #347/22  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK
  #347/23  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 4:OK
  #347/24  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK
  #347/25  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 5:OK
  #347/26  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK
  #347/27  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 6:OK
  #347/28  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK
  #347/29  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 7:OK
  #347/30  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 7 @unpriv:OK
  #347/31  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 8:OK
  #347/32  verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, non-zero reg divisor, check 8 @unpriv:OK
  #347/33  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 1:OK
  #347/34  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK
  #347/35  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 2:OK
  #347/36  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK
  #347/37  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 3:OK
  #347/38  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK
  #347/39  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 4:OK
  #347/40  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK
  #347/41  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 5:OK
  #347/42  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK
  #347/43  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 6:OK
  #347/44  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero imm divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK
  #347/45  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 1:OK
  #347/46  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK
  #347/47  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 2:OK
  #347/48  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK
  #347/49  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 3:OK
  #347/50  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK
  #347/51  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 4:OK
  #347/52  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK
  #347/53  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 5:OK
  #347/54  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK
  #347/55  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 6:OK
  #347/56  verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, non-zero reg divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK
  #347/57  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 1:OK
  #347/58  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK
  #347/59  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 2:OK
  #347/60  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK
  #347/61  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 3:OK
  #347/62  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK
  #347/63  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 4:OK
  #347/64  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK
  #347/65  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 5:OK
  #347/66  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK
  #347/67  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 6:OK
  #347/68  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero imm divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK
  #347/69  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 1:OK
  #347/70  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK
  #347/71  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 2:OK
  #347/72  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK
  #347/73  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 3:OK
  #347/74  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK
  #347/75  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 4:OK
  #347/76  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK
  #347/77  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 5:OK
  #347/78  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK
  #347/79  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 6:OK
  #347/80  verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, non-zero reg divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK
  #347/81  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 1:OK
  #347/82  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK
  #347/83  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 2:OK
  #347/84  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK
  #347/85  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 3:OK
  #347/86  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK
  #347/87  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 4:OK
  #347/88  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK
  #347/89  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 5:OK
  #347/90  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK
  #347/91  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 6:OK
  #347/92  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK
  #347/93  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 7:OK
  #347/94  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 7 @unpriv:OK
  #347/95  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 8:OK
  #347/96  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero imm divisor, check 8 @unpriv:OK
  #347/97  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 1:OK
  #347/98  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 1 @unpriv:OK
  #347/99  verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 2:OK
  #347/100 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 2 @unpriv:OK
  #347/101 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 3:OK
  #347/102 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 3 @unpriv:OK
  #347/103 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 4:OK
  #347/104 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 4 @unpriv:OK
  #347/105 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 5:OK
  #347/106 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 5 @unpriv:OK
  #347/107 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 6:OK
  #347/108 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 6 @unpriv:OK
  #347/109 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 7:OK
  #347/110 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 7 @unpriv:OK
  #347/111 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 8:OK
  #347/112 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, non-zero reg divisor, check 8 @unpriv:OK
  #347/113 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, zero divisor:OK
  #347/114 verifier_sdiv/SDIV32, zero divisor @unpriv:OK
  #347/115 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, zero divisor:OK
  #347/116 verifier_sdiv/SDIV64, zero divisor @unpriv:OK
  #347/117 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, zero divisor:OK
  #347/118 verifier_sdiv/SMOD32, zero divisor @unpriv:OK
  #347/119 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, zero divisor:OK
  #347/120 verifier_sdiv/SMOD64, zero divisor @unpriv:OK
  #347     verifier_sdiv:OK
  Summary: 6/166 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Tested-by: Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Acked-by: Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230815154158.717901-8-xukuohai@huaweicloud.com
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 28, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
391b07d 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent possible
invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <hfggklm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <hfggklm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <rabbelkin@mail.ru>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 28, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
68e0987 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent possible
invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <hfggklm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <hfggklm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <rabbelkin@mail.ru>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
f66a99d 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent possible
invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <hfggklm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <hfggklm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <rabbelkin@mail.ru>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
5b7c27f 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent possible
invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <hfggklm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <hfggklm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <rabbelkin@mail.ru>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
a09f9aa 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent possible
invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <hfggklm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <hfggklm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <rabbelkin@mail.ru>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
4a358d8 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent possible
invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <hfggklm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <hfggklm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <rabbelkin@mail.ru>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
0d5a305 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent possible
invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <hfggklm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <hfggklm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <rabbelkin@mail.ru>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 29, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
baef05a 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent possible
invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <hfggklm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <hfggklm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <rabbelkin@mail.ru>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 30, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
74313b1 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent possible
invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <hfggklm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <hfggklm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <rabbelkin@mail.ru>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 30, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
e339da5 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent possible
invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <hfggklm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <hfggklm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <rabbelkin@mail.ru>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 31, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
9e92fc6 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent possible
invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <hfggklm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <hfggklm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <rabbelkin@mail.ru>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Acked-by: Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 31, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
cfc9434 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent possible
invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <hfggklm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <hfggklm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <rabbelkin@mail.ru>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Acked-by: Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 1, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
5cc3c15 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent possible
invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <hfggklm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <hfggklm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <rabbelkin@mail.ru>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Acked-by: Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 19, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
1a3feaa 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent
possible invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <hfggklm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <hfggklm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <rabbelkin@mail.ru>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Acked-by: Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 20, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
5fa6101 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent
possible invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <hfggklm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <hfggklm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <rabbelkin@mail.ru>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Acked-by: Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 20, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
22ec9ad 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent
possible invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <hfggklm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <hfggklm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <rabbelkin@mail.ru>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Acked-by: Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 21, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
5c545fc 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent
possible invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <hfggklm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <hfggklm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <rabbelkin@mail.ru>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Acked-by: Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 21, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
29c1cdc 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent
possible invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <hfggklm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <hfggklm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <rabbelkin@mail.ru>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Acked-by: Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 22, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
764d8b6 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent
possible invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <hfggklm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <hfggklm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <rabbelkin@mail.ru>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Acked-by: Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 22, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
700f05d 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent
possible invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <hfggklm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <hfggklm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <rabbelkin@mail.ru>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Acked-by: Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
9250b53 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent
possible invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <hfggklm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <hfggklm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <rabbelkin@mail.ru>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Acked-by: Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
1754a91 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent
possible invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <hfggklm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <hfggklm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <rabbelkin@mail.ru>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Acked-by: Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 25, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
f703a69 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent
possible invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <hfggklm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <hfggklm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <rabbelkin@mail.ru>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Acked-by: Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 26, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
6fafa94 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent
possible invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <hfggklm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <hfggklm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <rabbelkin@mail.ru>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Acked-by: Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 26, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
2d19f5e 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent
possible invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <hfggklm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <hfggklm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <rabbelkin@mail.ru>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Acked-by: Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 26, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
5dd70f6 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent
possible invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <hfggklm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <hfggklm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <rabbelkin@mail.ru>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Acked-by: Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 26, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
1e8573b 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent
possible invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <hfggklm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <hfggklm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <rabbelkin@mail.ru>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Acked-by: Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 26, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
57a6714 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent
possible invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <hfggklm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <hfggklm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <rabbelkin@mail.ru>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Acked-by: Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 28, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
ce93c0b 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent
possible invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <hfggklm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <hfggklm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <rabbelkin@mail.ru>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Acked-by: Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 29, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
e5609b8 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent
possible invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <hfggklm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <hfggklm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <rabbelkin@mail.ru>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Acked-by: Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 2, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
f24a50b 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent
possible invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <hfggklm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <hfggklm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <rabbelkin@mail.ru>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Acked-by: Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 3, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
da00e1d 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent
possible invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <hfggklm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <hfggklm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <rabbelkin@mail.ru>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Acked-by: Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 3, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
4fdac56 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent
possible invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <hfggklm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <hfggklm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <rabbelkin@mail.ru>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Acked-by: Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 3, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
a643f75 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent
possible invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <hfggklm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <hfggklm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <rabbelkin@mail.ru>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Acked-by: Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 3, 2024
selftests/bpf: Add test cases for various pointer specifiers
824b75a 
Extend snprintf negative tests to cover pointer specifiers to prevent
possible invalid handling of %p% from happening again.

 ./test_progs -t snprintf
 #302/1   snprintf/snprintf_positive:OK
 #302/2   snprintf/snprintf_negative:OK
 #302     snprintf:OK
 #303     snprintf_btf:OK
 Summary: 2/2 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED

Co-developed-by: Nikita Marushkin <hfggklm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikita Marushkin <hfggklm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Shchipletsov <rabbelkin@mail.ru>
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Acked-by: Florent Revest <revest@chromium.org>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
bpf-next changes-requested V1
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@kernel-patches-bot @kaixuxiakx