Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support skipping cert validation (for self-signed certificates) #2310

Closed
1 task done
JorTurFer opened this issue Nov 21, 2021 · 3 comments
Closed
1 task done

Support skipping cert validation (for self-signed certificates) #2310

JorTurFer opened this issue Nov 21, 2021 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
feature-request All issues for new features that have not been committed to needs-discussion stale-bot-ignore All issues that should not be automatically closed by our stale bot

Comments

@JorTurFer
Copy link
Member

JorTurFer commented Nov 21, 2021

Proposal

We have several services which could be self-hosted. When a service is self-hosted, the TLS certificate could be self-signed, explicitly in development/staging environments. It'd be nice if KEDA supported those scenarios, skipping the certificate validation.

Right now, KEDA already supports it for influx and selenium-grid using the parameter unsafeSsl, we could extend this support to other scalers.

Use-Case

No response

Anything else?

No response

@JorTurFer JorTurFer added needs-discussion feature-request All issues for new features that have not been committed to labels Nov 21, 2021
@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jan 20, 2022

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed in 7 days if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the stale All issues that are marked as stale due to inactivity label Jan 20, 2022
@JorTurFer JorTurFer added the stale-bot-ignore All issues that should not be automatically closed by our stale bot label Jan 20, 2022
@stale stale bot removed the stale All issues that are marked as stale due to inactivity label Jan 20, 2022
@JorTurFer JorTurFer self-assigned this Jan 20, 2022
@mknet3
Copy link
Contributor

mknet3 commented Nov 6, 2022

I can do this issue :)

@JorTurFer
Copy link
Member Author

I close this as doesn't make sense after the support to custom CAs

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature-request All issues for new features that have not been committed to needs-discussion stale-bot-ignore All issues that should not be automatically closed by our stale bot
Projects
Archived in project
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants