Skip to content

Misc next for kdave #4

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 109 commits into from
Closed

Misc next for kdave #4

wants to merge 109 commits into from

Conversation

asj
Copy link

@asj asj commented Jul 11, 2018

Hi David,

Here I have put together a set of volume related patches which were sent to the ML as independent patches earlier. These have been reviewed and tested. Please pull.

git@github.com:asj/btrfs-devel.git misc-next-for-kdave


[Anand:2]
6049bd5 btrfs: add helper function check device delete able
8c96747 btrfs: add helper btrfs_num_devices() to deduce num_devices
dd61850 btrfs: warn for num_devices below 0
17c285a btrfs: use the assigned fs_devices instead of the dereference
e2f7c8a btrfs: do device clone using the btrfs_scan_one_device
89325c8 btrfs: fix race between free_stale_devices and close_fs_devices
0dfd681 btrfs: drop uuid_mutex in btrfs_free_extra_devids()

[David:2]
6fa6985 btrfs: fix mount and ioctl device scan ioctl race
e9f25a7 btrfs: reorder initialization before the mount locks uuid_mutex
2c5058c btrfs: lift uuid_mutex to callers of btrfs_parse_early_options
8ffc96e btrfs: lift uuid_mutex to callers of btrfs_open_devices
39a2036 btrfs: lift uuid_mutex to callers of btrfs_scan_one_device

[Anand:1]
e735e86 btrfs: fix btrfs_free_stale_devices() with needed locks
bdc6cc8 btrfs: btrfs_free_stale_devices() rename local variables
0dd1ff5 btrfs: fix device_list_add() missing device_list_mutex()
622f0a7 btrfs: do btrfs_free_stale_devices() outside of device_list_add()

[David:1]
7302fc0 btrfs: restore uuid_mutex in btrfs_open_devices

[Nikolay]
4da8563 btrfs: drop pending list in device close

Allen Pais and others added 30 commits July 10, 2018 12:19
The get_seconds() function is deprecated as it truncates the timestamp
to 32 bits. Change it to or ktime_get_real_seconds().

Signed-off-by: Allen Pais <allen.lkml@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ update changelog ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Since commit ac0b414 ("btrfs: scrub: Don't use inode pages
for device replace") the function is not used and we can remove all
functions down the call chain.

There was an optimization that reused inode pages to speed up device
replace, but broke when there was nodatasum and compressed page. The
potential performance gain is small so we don't loose much by removing
it and using scrub_pages same as the other pages.

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
[ update changelog ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Here is a doc-only patch which tires to deobfuscate the terra-incognita
that arguments for delayed refs are.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The comment wrongfully states that the owner parameter is the level of
the parent block. In fact owner is the level of the current block and
by adding 1 to it we can eventually get to the parent/root.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
There's a priority inversion that exists currently with btrfs fsync.  In
some cases we will collect outstanding ordered extents onto a list and
only wait on them at the very last second.  However this "very last
second" falls inside of a transaction handle, so if we are in a lower
priority cgroup we can end up holding the transaction open for longer
than needed, so if a high priority cgroup is also trying to fsync()
it'll see latency.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Since we are waiting on all ordered extents at the start of the fsync()
path we don't need to wait on any logged ordered extents, and we don't
need to look up the checksums on the ordered extents as they will
already be on disk prior to getting here.  Rework this so we're only
looking up and copying the on-disk checksums for the extent range we
care about.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
We no longer use this list we've passed around so remove it everywhere.
Also remove the extra checks for ordered/filemap errors as this is
handled higher up now that we're waiting on ordered_extents before
getting to the tree log code.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This is no longer used anywhere, remove all of it.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Currently this function takes the root as an argument only to get the
log_root from it. Simplify this by directly passing the log root from
the caller. Also eliminate the fs_info local var, since it's used only
once, so directly reference it from the transaction handle.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This patch avoids that building the BTRFS source code with smatch
triggers complaints about inconsistent indenting.

Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This patch avoids that the compiler complains that a fall-through
annotation is missing when building with W=1.

Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
The C programming language does not allow to use preprocessor statements
inside macro arguments (pr_info() is defined as a macro). Hence rework
the pr_info() statement in btrfs_print_mod_info() such that it becomes
compliant. This patch allows tools like sparse to analyze the BTRFS
source code.

Fixes: 62e8557 ("btrfs: convert printk(KERN_* to use pr_* calls")
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@wdc.com>
Cc: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Cc: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This function is always called with a valid transaction so there is no
need to duplicate the fs_info, we can reference it directly from the
trans handle. No functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This function is always called with a valid transaction handle from
where fs_info can be referenced. So remove the redundant argument.
No functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This function is always called with a valid transaction handle from
where fs_info can be referenced. No functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This function is always called with a valid transaction from where the
fs_info can be referenced. No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This argument is unused. No functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This function is always called with a valid transaction handle from
where the fs_info can be referenced. No functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This function always uses the leaf's extent_buffer which already
contains a reference to the fs_info. No functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This function is always called with a valid transaction handle from
where the fs_info can be referenced. No functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This function is always called with a valid transaction handle from
where fs_info can be referenced. No functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This argument is unused. No functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This function is always called with a valid transaction handle from
where fs_info can be referenced. No functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This function is always called with a valid transaction handle from
where fs_info can be referenced. No functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This function is always called with a valid transaction handle from
where we can reference the fs_info. No functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This function is always called with a valid transaction handle from
where we can reference fs_info. No functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This function is always called with a valid transaction handle so we
can reference the fs_info from there. No functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
fs_info can be referenced from the transaction handle, which is always
valid. No functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This function already takes a transaction which holds a reference to
the fs_info struct. Use that reference and remove the extra arg. No
functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This function is always called with a valid transaction from where
fs_info can be referenced. No functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
kdave pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 17, 2025
This commit addresses a circular locking dependency issue within the GFX
isolation mechanism. The problem was identified by a warning indicating
a potential deadlock due to inconsistent lock acquisition order.

- The `amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_begin_use` and
  `amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_end_use` functions previously
  acquired `enforce_isolation_mutex` and called `amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl`,
  leading to potential deadlocks. ie., If `amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl` is
  called while `enforce_isolation_mutex` is held, and
  `amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_handler` is called while `kfd_sch_mutex` is
  held, it can create a circular dependency.

By ensuring consistent lock usage, this fix resolves the issue:

[  606.297333] ======================================================
[  606.297343] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
[  606.297353] 6.10.0-amd-mlkd-610-311224-lof torvalds#19 Tainted: G           OE
[  606.297365] ------------------------------------------------------
[  606.297375] kworker/u96:3/3825 is trying to acquire lock:
[  606.297385] ffff9aa64e431cb8 ((work_completion)(&(&adev->gfx.enforce_isolation[i].work)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0x232/0x610
[  606.297413]
               but task is already holding lock:
[  606.297423] ffff9aa64e432338 (&adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl+0x51/0x4d0 [amdgpu]
[  606.297725]
               which lock already depends on the new lock.

[  606.297738]
               the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[  606.297749]
               -> #2 (&adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
[  606.297765]        __mutex_lock+0x85/0x930
[  606.297776]        mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30
[  606.297786]        amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl+0x51/0x4d0 [amdgpu]
[  606.298007]        amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_begin_use+0x2a4/0x5d0 [amdgpu]
[  606.298225]        amdgpu_ring_alloc+0x48/0x70 [amdgpu]
[  606.298412]        amdgpu_ib_schedule+0x176/0x8a0 [amdgpu]
[  606.298603]        amdgpu_job_run+0xac/0x1e0 [amdgpu]
[  606.298866]        drm_sched_run_job_work+0x24f/0x430 [gpu_sched]
[  606.298880]        process_one_work+0x21e/0x680
[  606.298890]        worker_thread+0x190/0x350
[  606.298899]        kthread+0xe7/0x120
[  606.298908]        ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x60
[  606.298919]        ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
[  606.298929]
               -> #1 (&adev->enforce_isolation_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
[  606.298947]        __mutex_lock+0x85/0x930
[  606.298956]        mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30
[  606.298966]        amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_handler+0x87/0x370 [amdgpu]
[  606.299190]        process_one_work+0x21e/0x680
[  606.299199]        worker_thread+0x190/0x350
[  606.299208]        kthread+0xe7/0x120
[  606.299217]        ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x60
[  606.299227]        ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
[  606.299236]
               -> #0 ((work_completion)(&(&adev->gfx.enforce_isolation[i].work)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}:
[  606.299257]        __lock_acquire+0x16f9/0x2810
[  606.299267]        lock_acquire+0xd1/0x300
[  606.299276]        __flush_work+0x250/0x610
[  606.299286]        cancel_delayed_work_sync+0x71/0x80
[  606.299296]        amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl+0x287/0x4d0 [amdgpu]
[  606.299509]        amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_begin_use+0x2a4/0x5d0 [amdgpu]
[  606.299723]        amdgpu_ring_alloc+0x48/0x70 [amdgpu]
[  606.299909]        amdgpu_ib_schedule+0x176/0x8a0 [amdgpu]
[  606.300101]        amdgpu_job_run+0xac/0x1e0 [amdgpu]
[  606.300355]        drm_sched_run_job_work+0x24f/0x430 [gpu_sched]
[  606.300369]        process_one_work+0x21e/0x680
[  606.300378]        worker_thread+0x190/0x350
[  606.300387]        kthread+0xe7/0x120
[  606.300396]        ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x60
[  606.300406]        ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
[  606.300416]
               other info that might help us debug this:

[  606.300428] Chain exists of:
                 (work_completion)(&(&adev->gfx.enforce_isolation[i].work)->work) --> &adev->enforce_isolation_mutex --> &adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex

[  606.300458]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

[  606.300468]        CPU0                    CPU1
[  606.300476]        ----                    ----
[  606.300484]   lock(&adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex);
[  606.300494]                                lock(&adev->enforce_isolation_mutex);
[  606.300508]                                lock(&adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex);
[  606.300521]   lock((work_completion)(&(&adev->gfx.enforce_isolation[i].work)->work));
[  606.300536]
                *** DEADLOCK ***

[  606.300546] 5 locks held by kworker/u96:3/3825:
[  606.300555]  #0: ffff9aa5aa1f5d58 ((wq_completion)comp_1.1.0){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x3f5/0x680
[  606.300577]  #1: ffffaa53c3c97e40 ((work_completion)(&sched->work_run_job)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1d6/0x680
[  606.300600]  #2: ffff9aa64e463c98 (&adev->enforce_isolation_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_begin_use+0x1c3/0x5d0 [amdgpu]
[  606.300837]  #3: ffff9aa64e432338 (&adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl+0x51/0x4d0 [amdgpu]
[  606.301062]  #4: ffffffff8c1a5660 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __flush_work+0x70/0x610
[  606.301083]
               stack backtrace:
[  606.301092] CPU: 14 PID: 3825 Comm: kworker/u96:3 Tainted: G           OE      6.10.0-amd-mlkd-610-311224-lof torvalds#19
[  606.301109] Hardware name: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. X570S GAMING X/X570S GAMING X, BIOS F7 03/22/2024
[  606.301124] Workqueue: comp_1.1.0 drm_sched_run_job_work [gpu_sched]
[  606.301140] Call Trace:
[  606.301146]  <TASK>
[  606.301154]  dump_stack_lvl+0x9b/0xf0
[  606.301166]  dump_stack+0x10/0x20
[  606.301175]  print_circular_bug+0x26c/0x340
[  606.301187]  check_noncircular+0x157/0x170
[  606.301197]  ? register_lock_class+0x48/0x490
[  606.301213]  __lock_acquire+0x16f9/0x2810
[  606.301230]  lock_acquire+0xd1/0x300
[  606.301239]  ? __flush_work+0x232/0x610
[  606.301250]  ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
[  606.301261]  ? mark_held_locks+0x54/0x90
[  606.301274]  ? __flush_work+0x232/0x610
[  606.301284]  __flush_work+0x250/0x610
[  606.301293]  ? __flush_work+0x232/0x610
[  606.301305]  ? __pfx_wq_barrier_func+0x10/0x10
[  606.301318]  ? mark_held_locks+0x54/0x90
[  606.301331]  ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
[  606.301345]  cancel_delayed_work_sync+0x71/0x80
[  606.301356]  amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl+0x287/0x4d0 [amdgpu]
[  606.301661]  amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_begin_use+0x2a4/0x5d0 [amdgpu]
[  606.302050]  ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
[  606.302069]  amdgpu_ring_alloc+0x48/0x70 [amdgpu]
[  606.302452]  amdgpu_ib_schedule+0x176/0x8a0 [amdgpu]
[  606.302862]  ? drm_sched_entity_error+0x82/0x190 [gpu_sched]
[  606.302890]  amdgpu_job_run+0xac/0x1e0 [amdgpu]
[  606.303366]  drm_sched_run_job_work+0x24f/0x430 [gpu_sched]
[  606.303388]  process_one_work+0x21e/0x680
[  606.303409]  worker_thread+0x190/0x350
[  606.303424]  ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
[  606.303437]  kthread+0xe7/0x120
[  606.303449]  ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
[  606.303463]  ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x60
[  606.303476]  ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
[  606.303489]  ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
[  606.303512]  </TASK>

v2: Refactor lock handling to resolve circular dependency (Alex)

- Introduced a `sched_work` flag to defer the call to
  `amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl` until after releasing
  `enforce_isolation_mutex`.
- This change ensures that `amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl` is called outside
  the critical section, preventing the circular dependency and deadlock.
- The `sched_work` flag is set within the mutex-protected section if
  conditions are met, and the actual function call is made afterward.
- This approach ensures consistent lock acquisition order.

Fixes: afefd6f ("drm/amdgpu: Implement Enforce Isolation Handler for KGD/KFD serialization")
Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Srinivasan Shanmugam <srinivasan.shanmugam@amd.com>
Suggested-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
(cherry picked from commit 0b6b2dd)
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
kdave pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 18, 2025
irq_chip functions may be called in raw spinlock context. Therefore, we
must also use a raw spinlock for our own internal locking.

This fixes the following lockdep splat:

[    5.349336] =============================
[    5.353349] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
[    5.357361] 6.13.0-rc5+ torvalds#69 Tainted: G        W
[    5.363031] -----------------------------
[    5.367045] kworker/u17:1/44 is trying to lock:
[    5.371587] ffffff88018b02c0 (&chip->gpio_lock){....}-{3:3}, at: xgpio_irq_unmask (drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c:433 (discriminator 8))
[    5.380079] other info that might help us debug this:
[    5.385138] context-{5:5}
[    5.387762] 5 locks held by kworker/u17:1/44:
[    5.392123] #0: ffffff8800014958 ((wq_completion)events_unbound){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work (kernel/workqueue.c:3204)
[    5.402260] #1: ffffffc082fcbdd8 (deferred_probe_work){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work (kernel/workqueue.c:3205)
[    5.411528] #2: ffffff880172c900 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __device_attach (drivers/base/dd.c:1006)
[    5.419929] #3: ffffff88039c8268 (request_class#2){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: __setup_irq (kernel/irq/internals.h:156 kernel/irq/manage.c:1596)
[    5.428331] #4: ffffff88039c80c8 (lock_class#2){....}-{2:2}, at: __setup_irq (kernel/irq/manage.c:1614)
[    5.436472] stack backtrace:
[    5.439359] CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 44 Comm: kworker/u17:1 Tainted: G        W          6.13.0-rc5+ torvalds#69
[    5.448690] Tainted: [W]=WARN
[    5.451656] Hardware name: xlnx,zynqmp (DT)
[    5.455845] Workqueue: events_unbound deferred_probe_work_func
[    5.461699] Call trace:
[    5.464147] show_stack+0x18/0x24 C
[    5.467821] dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:123)
[    5.471501] dump_stack (lib/dump_stack.c:130)
[    5.474824] __lock_acquire (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4828 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4898 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5176)
[    5.478758] lock_acquire (arch/arm64/include/asm/percpu.h:40 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:467 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5851 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5814)
[    5.482429] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave (include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:111 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:162)
[    5.486797] xgpio_irq_unmask (drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c:433 (discriminator 8))
[    5.490737] irq_enable (kernel/irq/internals.h:236 kernel/irq/chip.c:170 kernel/irq/chip.c:439 kernel/irq/chip.c:432 kernel/irq/chip.c:345)
[    5.494060] __irq_startup (kernel/irq/internals.h:241 kernel/irq/chip.c:180 kernel/irq/chip.c:250)
[    5.497645] irq_startup (kernel/irq/chip.c:270)
[    5.501143] __setup_irq (kernel/irq/manage.c:1807)
[    5.504728] request_threaded_irq (kernel/irq/manage.c:2208)

Fixes: a32c7ca ("gpio: gpio-xilinx: Add interrupt support")
Signed-off-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@linux.dev>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250110163354.2012654-1-sean.anderson@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
kdave pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 23, 2025
When COWing a relocation tree path, at relocation.c:replace_path(), we
can trigger a lockdep splat while we are in the btrfs_search_slot() call
against the relocation root. This happens in that callchain at
ctree.c:read_block_for_search() when we happen to find a child extent
buffer already loaded through the fs tree with a lockdep class set to
the fs tree. So when we attempt to lock that extent buffer through a
relocation tree we have to reset the lockdep class to the class for a
relocation tree, since a relocation tree has extent buffers that used
to belong to a fs tree and may currently be already loaded (we swap
extent buffers between the two trees at the end of replace_path()).

However we are missing calls to btrfs_maybe_reset_lockdep_class() to reset
the lockdep class at ctree.c:read_block_for_search() before we read lock
an extent buffer, just like we did for btrfs_search_slot() in commit
b40130b ("btrfs: fix lockdep splat with reloc root extent buffers").

So add the missing btrfs_maybe_reset_lockdep_class() calls before the
attempts to read lock an extent buffer at ctree.c:read_block_for_search().

The lockdep splat was reported by syzbot and it looks like this:

   ======================================================
   WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
   6.13.0-rc5-syzkaller-00163-gab75170520d4 #0 Not tainted
   ------------------------------------------------------
   syz.0.0/5335 is trying to acquire lock:
   ffff8880545dbc38 (btrfs-tree-01){++++}-{4:4}, at: btrfs_tree_read_lock_nested+0x2f/0x250 fs/btrfs/locking.c:146

   but task is already holding lock:
   ffff8880545dba58 (btrfs-treloc-02/1){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: btrfs_tree_lock_nested+0x2f/0x250 fs/btrfs/locking.c:189

   which lock already depends on the new lock.

   the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

   -> #2 (btrfs-treloc-02/1){+.+.}-{4:4}:
          reacquire_held_locks+0x3eb/0x690 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5374
          __lock_release kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5563 [inline]
          lock_release+0x396/0xa30 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5870
          up_write+0x79/0x590 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1629
          btrfs_force_cow_block+0x14b3/0x1fd0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:660
          btrfs_cow_block+0x371/0x830 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:755
          btrfs_search_slot+0xc01/0x3180 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2153
          replace_path+0x1243/0x2740 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1224
          merge_reloc_root+0xc46/0x1ad0 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1692
          merge_reloc_roots+0x3b3/0x980 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1942
          relocate_block_group+0xb0a/0xd40 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3754
          btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x77d/0xd90 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4087
          btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x12c/0x3b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3494
          __btrfs_balance+0x1b0f/0x26b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4278
          btrfs_balance+0xbdc/0x10c0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4655
          btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x493/0x7c0 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:3670
          vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
          __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:906 [inline]
          __se_sys_ioctl+0xf5/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:892
          do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
          do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
          entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

   -> #1 (btrfs-tree-01/1){+.+.}-{4:4}:
          lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849
          down_write_nested+0xa2/0x220 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1693
          btrfs_tree_lock_nested+0x2f/0x250 fs/btrfs/locking.c:189
          btrfs_init_new_buffer fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:5052 [inline]
          btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x41c/0x1440 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:5132
          btrfs_force_cow_block+0x526/0x1fd0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:573
          btrfs_cow_block+0x371/0x830 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:755
          btrfs_search_slot+0xc01/0x3180 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2153
          btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x9c/0x1a0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:4351
          btrfs_insert_empty_item fs/btrfs/ctree.h:688 [inline]
          btrfs_insert_inode_ref+0x2bb/0xf80 fs/btrfs/inode-item.c:330
          btrfs_rename_exchange fs/btrfs/inode.c:7990 [inline]
          btrfs_rename2+0xcb7/0x2b90 fs/btrfs/inode.c:8374
          vfs_rename+0xbdb/0xf00 fs/namei.c:5067
          do_renameat2+0xd94/0x13f0 fs/namei.c:5224
          __do_sys_renameat2 fs/namei.c:5258 [inline]
          __se_sys_renameat2 fs/namei.c:5255 [inline]
          __x64_sys_renameat2+0xce/0xe0 fs/namei.c:5255
          do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
          do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
          entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

   -> #0 (btrfs-tree-01){++++}-{4:4}:
          check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3161 [inline]
          check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3280 [inline]
          validate_chain+0x18ef/0x5920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3904
          __lock_acquire+0x1397/0x2100 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5226
          lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849
          down_read_nested+0xb5/0xa50 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1649
          btrfs_tree_read_lock_nested+0x2f/0x250 fs/btrfs/locking.c:146
          btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.h:188 [inline]
          read_block_for_search+0x718/0xbb0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1610
          btrfs_search_slot+0x1274/0x3180 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2237
          replace_path+0x1243/0x2740 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1224
          merge_reloc_root+0xc46/0x1ad0 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1692
          merge_reloc_roots+0x3b3/0x980 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1942
          relocate_block_group+0xb0a/0xd40 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3754
          btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x77d/0xd90 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4087
          btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x12c/0x3b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3494
          __btrfs_balance+0x1b0f/0x26b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4278
          btrfs_balance+0xbdc/0x10c0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4655
          btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x493/0x7c0 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:3670
          vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
          __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:906 [inline]
          __se_sys_ioctl+0xf5/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:892
          do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
          do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
          entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

   other info that might help us debug this:

   Chain exists of:
     btrfs-tree-01 --> btrfs-tree-01/1 --> btrfs-treloc-02/1

    Possible unsafe locking scenario:

          CPU0                    CPU1
          ----                    ----
     lock(btrfs-treloc-02/1);
                                  lock(btrfs-tree-01/1);
                                  lock(btrfs-treloc-02/1);
     rlock(btrfs-tree-01);

    *** DEADLOCK ***

   8 locks held by syz.0.0/5335:
    #0: ffff88801e3ae420 (sb_writers#13){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write_file+0x5e/0x200 fs/namespace.c:559
    #1: ffff888052c760d0 (&fs_info->reclaim_bgs_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: __btrfs_balance+0x4c2/0x26b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4183
    #2: ffff888052c74850 (&fs_info->cleaner_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x775/0xd90 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4086
    #3: ffff88801e3ae610 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: merge_reloc_root+0xf11/0x1ad0 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1659
    #4: ffff888052c76470 (btrfs_trans_num_writers){++++}-{0:0}, at: join_transaction+0x405/0xda0 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:288
    #5: ffff888052c76498 (btrfs_trans_num_extwriters){++++}-{0:0}, at: join_transaction+0x405/0xda0 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:288
    #6: ffff8880545db878 (btrfs-tree-01/1){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: btrfs_tree_lock_nested+0x2f/0x250 fs/btrfs/locking.c:189
    #7: ffff8880545dba58 (btrfs-treloc-02/1){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: btrfs_tree_lock_nested+0x2f/0x250 fs/btrfs/locking.c:189

   stack backtrace:
   CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5335 Comm: syz.0.0 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc5-syzkaller-00163-gab75170520d4 #0
   Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014
   Call Trace:
    <TASK>
    __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline]
    dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:120
    print_circular_bug+0x13a/0x1b0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2074
    check_noncircular+0x36a/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2206
    check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3161 [inline]
    check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3280 [inline]
    validate_chain+0x18ef/0x5920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3904
    __lock_acquire+0x1397/0x2100 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5226
    lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849
    down_read_nested+0xb5/0xa50 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1649
    btrfs_tree_read_lock_nested+0x2f/0x250 fs/btrfs/locking.c:146
    btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.h:188 [inline]
    read_block_for_search+0x718/0xbb0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1610
    btrfs_search_slot+0x1274/0x3180 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2237
    replace_path+0x1243/0x2740 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1224
    merge_reloc_root+0xc46/0x1ad0 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1692
    merge_reloc_roots+0x3b3/0x980 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1942
    relocate_block_group+0xb0a/0xd40 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3754
    btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x77d/0xd90 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4087
    btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x12c/0x3b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3494
    __btrfs_balance+0x1b0f/0x26b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4278
    btrfs_balance+0xbdc/0x10c0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4655
    btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x493/0x7c0 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:3670
    vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
    __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:906 [inline]
    __se_sys_ioctl+0xf5/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:892
    do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
    do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
    entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
   RIP: 0033:0x7f1ac6985d29
   Code: ff ff c3 (...)
   RSP: 002b:00007f1ac63fe038 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
   RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f1ac6b76160 RCX: 00007f1ac6985d29
   RDX: 0000000020000180 RSI: 00000000c4009420 RDI: 0000000000000007
   RBP: 00007f1ac6a01b08 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
   R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
   R13: 0000000000000001 R14: 00007f1ac6b76160 R15: 00007fffda145a88
    </TASK>

Reported-by: syzbot+63913e558c084f7f8fdc@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/677b3014.050a0220.3b53b0.0064.GAE@google.com/
Fixes: 9978599 ("btrfs: reduce lock contention when eb cache miss for btree search")
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
kdave pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 23, 2025
When COWing a relocation tree path, at relocation.c:replace_path(), we
can trigger a lockdep splat while we are in the btrfs_search_slot() call
against the relocation root. This happens in that callchain at
ctree.c:read_block_for_search() when we happen to find a child extent
buffer already loaded through the fs tree with a lockdep class set to
the fs tree. So when we attempt to lock that extent buffer through a
relocation tree we have to reset the lockdep class to the class for a
relocation tree, since a relocation tree has extent buffers that used
to belong to a fs tree and may currently be already loaded (we swap
extent buffers between the two trees at the end of replace_path()).

However we are missing calls to btrfs_maybe_reset_lockdep_class() to reset
the lockdep class at ctree.c:read_block_for_search() before we read lock
an extent buffer, just like we did for btrfs_search_slot() in commit
b40130b ("btrfs: fix lockdep splat with reloc root extent buffers").

So add the missing btrfs_maybe_reset_lockdep_class() calls before the
attempts to read lock an extent buffer at ctree.c:read_block_for_search().

The lockdep splat was reported by syzbot and it looks like this:

   ======================================================
   WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
   6.13.0-rc5-syzkaller-00163-gab75170520d4 #0 Not tainted
   ------------------------------------------------------
   syz.0.0/5335 is trying to acquire lock:
   ffff8880545dbc38 (btrfs-tree-01){++++}-{4:4}, at: btrfs_tree_read_lock_nested+0x2f/0x250 fs/btrfs/locking.c:146

   but task is already holding lock:
   ffff8880545dba58 (btrfs-treloc-02/1){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: btrfs_tree_lock_nested+0x2f/0x250 fs/btrfs/locking.c:189

   which lock already depends on the new lock.

   the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

   -> #2 (btrfs-treloc-02/1){+.+.}-{4:4}:
          reacquire_held_locks+0x3eb/0x690 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5374
          __lock_release kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5563 [inline]
          lock_release+0x396/0xa30 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5870
          up_write+0x79/0x590 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1629
          btrfs_force_cow_block+0x14b3/0x1fd0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:660
          btrfs_cow_block+0x371/0x830 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:755
          btrfs_search_slot+0xc01/0x3180 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2153
          replace_path+0x1243/0x2740 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1224
          merge_reloc_root+0xc46/0x1ad0 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1692
          merge_reloc_roots+0x3b3/0x980 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1942
          relocate_block_group+0xb0a/0xd40 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3754
          btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x77d/0xd90 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4087
          btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x12c/0x3b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3494
          __btrfs_balance+0x1b0f/0x26b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4278
          btrfs_balance+0xbdc/0x10c0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4655
          btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x493/0x7c0 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:3670
          vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
          __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:906 [inline]
          __se_sys_ioctl+0xf5/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:892
          do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
          do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
          entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

   -> #1 (btrfs-tree-01/1){+.+.}-{4:4}:
          lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849
          down_write_nested+0xa2/0x220 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1693
          btrfs_tree_lock_nested+0x2f/0x250 fs/btrfs/locking.c:189
          btrfs_init_new_buffer fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:5052 [inline]
          btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x41c/0x1440 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:5132
          btrfs_force_cow_block+0x526/0x1fd0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:573
          btrfs_cow_block+0x371/0x830 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:755
          btrfs_search_slot+0xc01/0x3180 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2153
          btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x9c/0x1a0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:4351
          btrfs_insert_empty_item fs/btrfs/ctree.h:688 [inline]
          btrfs_insert_inode_ref+0x2bb/0xf80 fs/btrfs/inode-item.c:330
          btrfs_rename_exchange fs/btrfs/inode.c:7990 [inline]
          btrfs_rename2+0xcb7/0x2b90 fs/btrfs/inode.c:8374
          vfs_rename+0xbdb/0xf00 fs/namei.c:5067
          do_renameat2+0xd94/0x13f0 fs/namei.c:5224
          __do_sys_renameat2 fs/namei.c:5258 [inline]
          __se_sys_renameat2 fs/namei.c:5255 [inline]
          __x64_sys_renameat2+0xce/0xe0 fs/namei.c:5255
          do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
          do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
          entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

   -> #0 (btrfs-tree-01){++++}-{4:4}:
          check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3161 [inline]
          check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3280 [inline]
          validate_chain+0x18ef/0x5920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3904
          __lock_acquire+0x1397/0x2100 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5226
          lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849
          down_read_nested+0xb5/0xa50 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1649
          btrfs_tree_read_lock_nested+0x2f/0x250 fs/btrfs/locking.c:146
          btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.h:188 [inline]
          read_block_for_search+0x718/0xbb0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1610
          btrfs_search_slot+0x1274/0x3180 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2237
          replace_path+0x1243/0x2740 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1224
          merge_reloc_root+0xc46/0x1ad0 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1692
          merge_reloc_roots+0x3b3/0x980 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1942
          relocate_block_group+0xb0a/0xd40 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3754
          btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x77d/0xd90 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4087
          btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x12c/0x3b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3494
          __btrfs_balance+0x1b0f/0x26b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4278
          btrfs_balance+0xbdc/0x10c0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4655
          btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x493/0x7c0 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:3670
          vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
          __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:906 [inline]
          __se_sys_ioctl+0xf5/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:892
          do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
          do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
          entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f

   other info that might help us debug this:

   Chain exists of:
     btrfs-tree-01 --> btrfs-tree-01/1 --> btrfs-treloc-02/1

    Possible unsafe locking scenario:

          CPU0                    CPU1
          ----                    ----
     lock(btrfs-treloc-02/1);
                                  lock(btrfs-tree-01/1);
                                  lock(btrfs-treloc-02/1);
     rlock(btrfs-tree-01);

    *** DEADLOCK ***

   8 locks held by syz.0.0/5335:
    #0: ffff88801e3ae420 (sb_writers#13){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write_file+0x5e/0x200 fs/namespace.c:559
    #1: ffff888052c760d0 (&fs_info->reclaim_bgs_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: __btrfs_balance+0x4c2/0x26b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4183
    #2: ffff888052c74850 (&fs_info->cleaner_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x775/0xd90 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4086
    #3: ffff88801e3ae610 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: merge_reloc_root+0xf11/0x1ad0 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1659
    #4: ffff888052c76470 (btrfs_trans_num_writers){++++}-{0:0}, at: join_transaction+0x405/0xda0 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:288
    #5: ffff888052c76498 (btrfs_trans_num_extwriters){++++}-{0:0}, at: join_transaction+0x405/0xda0 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:288
    #6: ffff8880545db878 (btrfs-tree-01/1){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: btrfs_tree_lock_nested+0x2f/0x250 fs/btrfs/locking.c:189
    #7: ffff8880545dba58 (btrfs-treloc-02/1){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: btrfs_tree_lock_nested+0x2f/0x250 fs/btrfs/locking.c:189

   stack backtrace:
   CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 5335 Comm: syz.0.0 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc5-syzkaller-00163-gab75170520d4 #0
   Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014
   Call Trace:
    <TASK>
    __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:94 [inline]
    dump_stack_lvl+0x241/0x360 lib/dump_stack.c:120
    print_circular_bug+0x13a/0x1b0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2074
    check_noncircular+0x36a/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2206
    check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3161 [inline]
    check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3280 [inline]
    validate_chain+0x18ef/0x5920 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3904
    __lock_acquire+0x1397/0x2100 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5226
    lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x550 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5849
    down_read_nested+0xb5/0xa50 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1649
    btrfs_tree_read_lock_nested+0x2f/0x250 fs/btrfs/locking.c:146
    btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.h:188 [inline]
    read_block_for_search+0x718/0xbb0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1610
    btrfs_search_slot+0x1274/0x3180 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2237
    replace_path+0x1243/0x2740 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1224
    merge_reloc_root+0xc46/0x1ad0 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1692
    merge_reloc_roots+0x3b3/0x980 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:1942
    relocate_block_group+0xb0a/0xd40 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3754
    btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x77d/0xd90 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4087
    btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x12c/0x3b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3494
    __btrfs_balance+0x1b0f/0x26b0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4278
    btrfs_balance+0xbdc/0x10c0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4655
    btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x493/0x7c0 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:3670
    vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
    __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:906 [inline]
    __se_sys_ioctl+0xf5/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:892
    do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
    do_syscall_64+0xf3/0x230 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
    entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
   RIP: 0033:0x7f1ac6985d29
   Code: ff ff c3 (...)
   RSP: 002b:00007f1ac63fe038 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
   RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f1ac6b76160 RCX: 00007f1ac6985d29
   RDX: 0000000020000180 RSI: 00000000c4009420 RDI: 0000000000000007
   RBP: 00007f1ac6a01b08 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
   R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
   R13: 0000000000000001 R14: 00007f1ac6b76160 R15: 00007fffda145a88
    </TASK>

Reported-by: syzbot+63913e558c084f7f8fdc@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/677b3014.050a0220.3b53b0.0064.GAE@google.com/
Fixes: 9978599 ("btrfs: reduce lock contention when eb cache miss for btree search")
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
kdave pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 24, 2025
Hou Tao says:

====================
The use of migrate_{disable|enable} pair in BPF is mainly due to the
introduction of bpf memory allocator and the use of per-CPU data struct
in its internal implementation. The caller needs to disable migration
before invoking the alloc or free APIs of bpf memory allocator, and
enable migration after the invocation.

The main users of bpf memory allocator are various kind of bpf maps in
which the map values or the special fields in the map values are
allocated by using bpf memory allocator.

At present, the running context for bpf program has already disabled
migration explictly or implictly, therefore, when these maps are
manipulated in bpf program, it is OK to not invoke migrate_disable()
and migrate_enable() pair. Howevers, it is not always the case when
these maps are manipulated through bpf syscall, therefore many
migrate_{disable|enable} pairs are added when the map can either be
manipulated by BPF program or BPF syscall.

The initial idea of reducing the use of migrate_{disable|enable} comes
from Alexei [1]. I turned it into a patch set that archives the goals
through the following three methods:

1. remove unnecessary migrate_{disable|enable} pair
when the BPF syscall path also disables migration, it is OK to remove
the pair. Patch #1~#3 fall into this category, while patch #4~#5 are
partially included.

2. move the migrate_{disable|enable} pair from inner callee to outer
   caller
Instead of invoking migrate_disable() in the inner callee, invoking
migrate_disable() in the outer caller to simplify reasoning about when
migrate_disable() is needed. Patch #4~#5 and patch #6~torvalds#19 belongs to
this category.

3. add cant_migrate() check in the inner callee
Add cant_migrate() check in the inner callee to ensure the guarantee
that migration is disabled is not broken. Patch #1~#5, torvalds#13, torvalds#16~torvalds#19 also
belong to this category.

Please check the individual patches for more details. Comments are
always welcome.

Change Log:
v2:
  * sqaush the ->map_free related patches (#10~torvalds#12, torvalds#15) into one patch
  * remove unnecessary cant_migrate() checks.

v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250106081900.1665573-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com
====================

Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250108010728.207536-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
kdave pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 24, 2025
When kernel is built without debuginfo, running 'perf record' with
--off-cpu results in segfault as below:

   ./perf record --off-cpu -e dummy sleep 1
   libbpf: kernel BTF is missing at '/sys/kernel/btf/vmlinux', was CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF enabled?
   libbpf: failed to find '.BTF' ELF section in /lib/modules/6.13.0-rc3+/build/vmlinux
   libbpf: failed to find valid kernel BTF
   Segmentation fault (core dumped)

The backtrace pointed to:

   #0  0x00000000100fb17c in btf.type_cnt ()
   #1  0x00000000100fc1a8 in btf_find_by_name_kind ()
   #2  0x00000000100fc38c in btf.find_by_name_kind ()
   #3  0x00000000102ee3ac in off_cpu_prepare ()
   #4  0x000000001002f78c in cmd_record ()
   #5  0x00000000100aee78 in run_builtin ()
   #6  0x00000000100af3e4 in handle_internal_command ()
   #7  0x000000001001004c in main ()

Code sequence is:

   static void check_sched_switch_args(void)
   {
        struct btf *btf = btf__load_vmlinux_btf();
        const struct btf_type *t1, *t2, *t3;
        u32 type_id;

        type_id = btf__find_by_name_kind(btf, "btf_trace_sched_switch",
                                         BTF_KIND_TYPEDEF);

btf__load_vmlinux_btf() fails when CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF is not enabled.

Here bpf__find_by_name_kind() calls btf__type_cnt() with NULL btf value
and results in segfault.

To fix this, add a check to see if btf is not NULL before invoking
bpf__find_by_name_kind().

Reviewed-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Disha Goel <disgoel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241223135813.8175-1-atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
kdave pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 24, 2025
Hou Tao says:

====================
The patch set continues the previous work [1] to move all the freeings
of htab elements out of bucket lock. One motivation for the patch set is
the locking problem reported by Sebastian [2]: the freeing of bpf_timer
under PREEMPT_RT may acquire a spin-lock (namely softirq_expiry_lock).
However the freeing procedure for htab element has already held a
raw-spin-lock (namely bucket lock), and it will trigger the warning:
"BUG: scheduling while atomic" as demonstrated by the selftests patch.
Another motivation is to reduce the locked scope of bucket lock.

However, the patch set doesn't move all freeing of htab element out of
bucket lock, it still keep the free of special fields in pre-allocated
hash map under the protect of bucket lock in htab_map_update_elem(). The
patch set is structured as follows:

* Patch #1 moves the element freeing out of bucket lock for
  htab_lru_map_delete_node(). However the freeing is still in the locked
  scope of LRU raw spin lock.
* Patch #2~#3 move the element freeing out of bucket lock for
  __htab_map_lookup_and_delete_elem()
* Patch #4 cancels the bpf_timer in two steps to fix the locking
  problem in htab_map_update_elem() for PREEMPT_PRT.
* Patch #5 adds a selftest for the locking problem

Please see individual patches for more details. Comments are always
welcome.
---

v3:
 * patch #1: update the commit message to state that the freeing of
   special field is still in the locked scope of LRU raw spin lock
 * patch #4: cancel the bpf_timer in two steps only for PREEMPT_RT
   (suggested by Alexei)

v2: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250109061901.2620825-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com
  * cancels the bpf timer in two steps instead of breaking the reuse
    the refill of per-cpu ->extra_elems into two steps

v1: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250107085559.3081563-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241106063542.357743-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com
[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241106084527.4gPrMnHt@linutronix.de
====================

Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250117101816.2101857-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
kdave pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 29, 2025
This commit addresses a circular locking dependency issue within the GFX
isolation mechanism. The problem was identified by a warning indicating
a potential deadlock due to inconsistent lock acquisition order.

- The `amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_begin_use` and
  `amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_end_use` functions previously
  acquired `enforce_isolation_mutex` and called `amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl`,
  leading to potential deadlocks. ie., If `amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl` is
  called while `enforce_isolation_mutex` is held, and
  `amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_handler` is called while `kfd_sch_mutex` is
  held, it can create a circular dependency.

By ensuring consistent lock usage, this fix resolves the issue:

[  606.297333] ======================================================
[  606.297343] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
[  606.297353] 6.10.0-amd-mlkd-610-311224-lof torvalds#19 Tainted: G           OE
[  606.297365] ------------------------------------------------------
[  606.297375] kworker/u96:3/3825 is trying to acquire lock:
[  606.297385] ffff9aa64e431cb8 ((work_completion)(&(&adev->gfx.enforce_isolation[i].work)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0x232/0x610
[  606.297413]
               but task is already holding lock:
[  606.297423] ffff9aa64e432338 (&adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl+0x51/0x4d0 [amdgpu]
[  606.297725]
               which lock already depends on the new lock.

[  606.297738]
               the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[  606.297749]
               -> #2 (&adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
[  606.297765]        __mutex_lock+0x85/0x930
[  606.297776]        mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30
[  606.297786]        amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl+0x51/0x4d0 [amdgpu]
[  606.298007]        amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_begin_use+0x2a4/0x5d0 [amdgpu]
[  606.298225]        amdgpu_ring_alloc+0x48/0x70 [amdgpu]
[  606.298412]        amdgpu_ib_schedule+0x176/0x8a0 [amdgpu]
[  606.298603]        amdgpu_job_run+0xac/0x1e0 [amdgpu]
[  606.298866]        drm_sched_run_job_work+0x24f/0x430 [gpu_sched]
[  606.298880]        process_one_work+0x21e/0x680
[  606.298890]        worker_thread+0x190/0x350
[  606.298899]        kthread+0xe7/0x120
[  606.298908]        ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x60
[  606.298919]        ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
[  606.298929]
               -> #1 (&adev->enforce_isolation_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
[  606.298947]        __mutex_lock+0x85/0x930
[  606.298956]        mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x30
[  606.298966]        amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_handler+0x87/0x370 [amdgpu]
[  606.299190]        process_one_work+0x21e/0x680
[  606.299199]        worker_thread+0x190/0x350
[  606.299208]        kthread+0xe7/0x120
[  606.299217]        ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x60
[  606.299227]        ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
[  606.299236]
               -> #0 ((work_completion)(&(&adev->gfx.enforce_isolation[i].work)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}:
[  606.299257]        __lock_acquire+0x16f9/0x2810
[  606.299267]        lock_acquire+0xd1/0x300
[  606.299276]        __flush_work+0x250/0x610
[  606.299286]        cancel_delayed_work_sync+0x71/0x80
[  606.299296]        amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl+0x287/0x4d0 [amdgpu]
[  606.299509]        amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_begin_use+0x2a4/0x5d0 [amdgpu]
[  606.299723]        amdgpu_ring_alloc+0x48/0x70 [amdgpu]
[  606.299909]        amdgpu_ib_schedule+0x176/0x8a0 [amdgpu]
[  606.300101]        amdgpu_job_run+0xac/0x1e0 [amdgpu]
[  606.300355]        drm_sched_run_job_work+0x24f/0x430 [gpu_sched]
[  606.300369]        process_one_work+0x21e/0x680
[  606.300378]        worker_thread+0x190/0x350
[  606.300387]        kthread+0xe7/0x120
[  606.300396]        ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x60
[  606.300406]        ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
[  606.300416]
               other info that might help us debug this:

[  606.300428] Chain exists of:
                 (work_completion)(&(&adev->gfx.enforce_isolation[i].work)->work) --> &adev->enforce_isolation_mutex --> &adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex

[  606.300458]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

[  606.300468]        CPU0                    CPU1
[  606.300476]        ----                    ----
[  606.300484]   lock(&adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex);
[  606.300494]                                lock(&adev->enforce_isolation_mutex);
[  606.300508]                                lock(&adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex);
[  606.300521]   lock((work_completion)(&(&adev->gfx.enforce_isolation[i].work)->work));
[  606.300536]
                *** DEADLOCK ***

[  606.300546] 5 locks held by kworker/u96:3/3825:
[  606.300555]  #0: ffff9aa5aa1f5d58 ((wq_completion)comp_1.1.0){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x3f5/0x680
[  606.300577]  #1: ffffaa53c3c97e40 ((work_completion)(&sched->work_run_job)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1d6/0x680
[  606.300600]  #2: ffff9aa64e463c98 (&adev->enforce_isolation_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_begin_use+0x1c3/0x5d0 [amdgpu]
[  606.300837]  #3: ffff9aa64e432338 (&adev->gfx.kfd_sch_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl+0x51/0x4d0 [amdgpu]
[  606.301062]  #4: ffffffff8c1a5660 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __flush_work+0x70/0x610
[  606.301083]
               stack backtrace:
[  606.301092] CPU: 14 PID: 3825 Comm: kworker/u96:3 Tainted: G           OE      6.10.0-amd-mlkd-610-311224-lof torvalds#19
[  606.301109] Hardware name: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. X570S GAMING X/X570S GAMING X, BIOS F7 03/22/2024
[  606.301124] Workqueue: comp_1.1.0 drm_sched_run_job_work [gpu_sched]
[  606.301140] Call Trace:
[  606.301146]  <TASK>
[  606.301154]  dump_stack_lvl+0x9b/0xf0
[  606.301166]  dump_stack+0x10/0x20
[  606.301175]  print_circular_bug+0x26c/0x340
[  606.301187]  check_noncircular+0x157/0x170
[  606.301197]  ? register_lock_class+0x48/0x490
[  606.301213]  __lock_acquire+0x16f9/0x2810
[  606.301230]  lock_acquire+0xd1/0x300
[  606.301239]  ? __flush_work+0x232/0x610
[  606.301250]  ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
[  606.301261]  ? mark_held_locks+0x54/0x90
[  606.301274]  ? __flush_work+0x232/0x610
[  606.301284]  __flush_work+0x250/0x610
[  606.301293]  ? __flush_work+0x232/0x610
[  606.301305]  ? __pfx_wq_barrier_func+0x10/0x10
[  606.301318]  ? mark_held_locks+0x54/0x90
[  606.301331]  ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
[  606.301345]  cancel_delayed_work_sync+0x71/0x80
[  606.301356]  amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl+0x287/0x4d0 [amdgpu]
[  606.301661]  amdgpu_gfx_enforce_isolation_ring_begin_use+0x2a4/0x5d0 [amdgpu]
[  606.302050]  ? srso_alias_return_thunk+0x5/0xfbef5
[  606.302069]  amdgpu_ring_alloc+0x48/0x70 [amdgpu]
[  606.302452]  amdgpu_ib_schedule+0x176/0x8a0 [amdgpu]
[  606.302862]  ? drm_sched_entity_error+0x82/0x190 [gpu_sched]
[  606.302890]  amdgpu_job_run+0xac/0x1e0 [amdgpu]
[  606.303366]  drm_sched_run_job_work+0x24f/0x430 [gpu_sched]
[  606.303388]  process_one_work+0x21e/0x680
[  606.303409]  worker_thread+0x190/0x350
[  606.303424]  ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
[  606.303437]  kthread+0xe7/0x120
[  606.303449]  ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
[  606.303463]  ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x60
[  606.303476]  ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
[  606.303489]  ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
[  606.303512]  </TASK>

v2: Refactor lock handling to resolve circular dependency (Alex)

- Introduced a `sched_work` flag to defer the call to
  `amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl` until after releasing
  `enforce_isolation_mutex`.
- This change ensures that `amdgpu_gfx_kfd_sch_ctrl` is called outside
  the critical section, preventing the circular dependency and deadlock.
- The `sched_work` flag is set within the mutex-protected section if
  conditions are met, and the actual function call is made afterward.
- This approach ensures consistent lock acquisition order.

Fixes: afefd6f ("drm/amdgpu: Implement Enforce Isolation Handler for KGD/KFD serialization")
Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Srinivasan Shanmugam <srinivasan.shanmugam@amd.com>
Suggested-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
kdave pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 5, 2025
libtraceevent parses and returns an array of argument fields, sometimes
larger than RAW_SYSCALL_ARGS_NUM (6) because it includes "__syscall_nr",
idx will traverse to index 6 (7th element) whereas sc->fmt->arg holds 6
elements max, creating an out-of-bounds access. This runtime error is
found by UBsan. The error message:

  $ sudo UBSAN_OPTIONS=print_stacktrace=1 ./perf trace -a --max-events=1
  builtin-trace.c:1966:35: runtime error: index 6 out of bounds for type 'syscall_arg_fmt [6]'
    #0 0x5c04956be5fe in syscall__alloc_arg_fmts /home/howard/hw/linux-perf/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c:1966
    #1 0x5c04956c0510 in trace__read_syscall_info /home/howard/hw/linux-perf/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c:2110
    #2 0x5c04956c372b in trace__syscall_info /home/howard/hw/linux-perf/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c:2436
    #3 0x5c04956d2f39 in trace__init_syscalls_bpf_prog_array_maps /home/howard/hw/linux-perf/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c:3897
    #4 0x5c04956d6d25 in trace__run /home/howard/hw/linux-perf/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c:4335
    #5 0x5c04956e112e in cmd_trace /home/howard/hw/linux-perf/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c:5502
    #6 0x5c04956eda7d in run_builtin /home/howard/hw/linux-perf/tools/perf/perf.c:351
    #7 0x5c04956ee0a8 in handle_internal_command /home/howard/hw/linux-perf/tools/perf/perf.c:404
    #8 0x5c04956ee37f in run_argv /home/howard/hw/linux-perf/tools/perf/perf.c:448
    #9 0x5c04956ee8e9 in main /home/howard/hw/linux-perf/tools/perf/perf.c:556
    #10 0x79eb3622a3b7 in __libc_start_call_main ../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58
    torvalds#11 0x79eb3622a47a in __libc_start_main_impl ../csu/libc-start.c:360
    torvalds#12 0x5c04955422d4 in _start (/home/howard/hw/linux-perf/tools/perf/perf+0x4e02d4) (BuildId: 5b6cab2d59e96a4341741765ad6914a4d784dbc6)

     0.000 ( 0.014 ms): Chrome_ChildIO/117244 write(fd: 238, buf: !, count: 1)                                      = 1

Fixes: 5e58fcf ("perf trace: Allow allocating sc->arg_fmt even without the syscall tracepoint")
Signed-off-by: Howard Chu <howardchu95@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250122025519.361873-1-howardchu95@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
kdave pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 5, 2025
This fixes the following hard lockup in isolate_lru_folios() during memory
reclaim.  If the LRU mostly contains ineligible folios this may trigger
watchdog.

watchdog: Watchdog detected hard LOCKUP on cpu 173
RIP: 0010:native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x255/0x2a0
Call Trace:
	_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x31/0x40
	folio_lruvec_lock_irqsave+0x5f/0x90
	folio_batch_move_lru+0x91/0x150
	lru_add_drain_per_cpu+0x1c/0x40
	process_one_work+0x17d/0x350
	worker_thread+0x27b/0x3a0
	kthread+0xe8/0x120
	ret_from_fork+0x34/0x50
	ret_from_fork_asm+0x1b/0x30

lruvec->lru_lock owner:

PID: 2865     TASK: ffff888139214d40  CPU: 40   COMMAND: "kswapd0"
 #0 [fffffe0000945e60] crash_nmi_callback at ffffffffa567a555
 #1 [fffffe0000945e68] nmi_handle at ffffffffa563b171
 #2 [fffffe0000945eb0] default_do_nmi at ffffffffa6575920
 #3 [fffffe0000945ed0] exc_nmi at ffffffffa6575af4
 #4 [fffffe0000945ef0] end_repeat_nmi at ffffffffa6601dde
    [exception RIP: isolate_lru_folios+403]
    RIP: ffffffffa597df53  RSP: ffffc90006fb7c28  RFLAGS: 00000002
    RAX: 0000000000000001  RBX: ffffc90006fb7c60  RCX: ffffea04a2196f88
    RDX: ffffc90006fb7c60  RSI: ffffc90006fb7c60  RDI: ffffea04a2197048
    RBP: ffff88812cbd3010   R8: ffffea04a2197008   R9: 0000000000000001
    R10: 0000000000000000  R11: 0000000000000001  R12: ffffea04a2197008
    R13: ffffea04a2197048  R14: ffffc90006fb7de8  R15: 0000000003e3e937
    ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff  CS: 0010  SS: 0018
    <NMI exception stack>
 #5 [ffffc90006fb7c28] isolate_lru_folios at ffffffffa597df53
 #6 [ffffc90006fb7cf8] shrink_active_list at ffffffffa597f788
 #7 [ffffc90006fb7da8] balance_pgdat at ffffffffa5986db0
 #8 [ffffc90006fb7ec0] kswapd at ffffffffa5987354
 #9 [ffffc90006fb7ef8] kthread at ffffffffa5748238
crash>

Scenario:
User processe are requesting a large amount of memory and keep page active.
Then a module continuously requests memory from ZONE_DMA32 area.
Memory reclaim will be triggered due to ZONE_DMA32 watermark alarm reached.
However pages in the LRU(active_anon) list are mostly from
the ZONE_NORMAL area.

Reproduce:
Terminal 1: Construct to continuously increase pages active(anon).
mkdir /tmp/memory
mount -t tmpfs -o size=1024000M tmpfs /tmp/memory
dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/memory/block bs=4M
tail /tmp/memory/block

Terminal 2:
vmstat -a 1
active will increase.
procs ---memory--- ---swap-- ---io---- -system-- ---cpu--- ...
 r  b   swpd   free  inact active   si   so    bi    bo
 1  0   0 1445623076 45898836 83646008    0    0     0
 1  0   0 1445623076 43450228 86094616    0    0     0
 1  0   0 1445623076 41003480 88541364    0    0     0
 1  0   0 1445623076 38557088 90987756    0    0     0
 1  0   0 1445623076 36109688 93435156    0    0     0
 1  0   0 1445619552 33663256 95881632    0    0     0
 1  0   0 1445619804 31217140 98327792    0    0     0
 1  0   0 1445619804 28769988 100774944    0    0     0
 1  0   0 1445619804 26322348 103222584    0    0     0
 1  0   0 1445619804 23875592 105669340    0    0     0

cat /proc/meminfo | head
Active(anon) increase.
MemTotal:       1579941036 kB
MemFree:        1445618500 kB
MemAvailable:   1453013224 kB
Buffers:            6516 kB
Cached:         128653956 kB
SwapCached:            0 kB
Active:         118110812 kB
Inactive:       11436620 kB
Active(anon):   115345744 kB
Inactive(anon):   945292 kB

When the Active(anon) is 115345744 kB, insmod module triggers
the ZONE_DMA32 watermark.

perf record -e vmscan:mm_vmscan_lru_isolate -aR
perf script
isolate_mode=0 classzone=1 order=1 nr_requested=32 nr_scanned=2
nr_skipped=2 nr_taken=0 lru=active_anon
isolate_mode=0 classzone=1 order=1 nr_requested=32 nr_scanned=0
nr_skipped=0 nr_taken=0 lru=active_anon
isolate_mode=0 classzone=1 order=0 nr_requested=32 nr_scanned=28835844
nr_skipped=28835844 nr_taken=0 lru=active_anon
isolate_mode=0 classzone=1 order=1 nr_requested=32 nr_scanned=28835844
nr_skipped=28835844 nr_taken=0 lru=active_anon
isolate_mode=0 classzone=1 order=0 nr_requested=32 nr_scanned=29
nr_skipped=29 nr_taken=0 lru=active_anon
isolate_mode=0 classzone=1 order=0 nr_requested=32 nr_scanned=0
nr_skipped=0 nr_taken=0 lru=active_anon

See nr_scanned=28835844.
28835844 * 4k = 115343376KB approximately equal to 115345744 kB.

If increase Active(anon) to 1000G then insmod module triggers
the ZONE_DMA32 watermark. hard lockup will occur.

In my device nr_scanned = 0000000003e3e937 when hard lockup.
Convert to memory size 0x0000000003e3e937 * 4KB = 261072092 KB.

   [ffffc90006fb7c28] isolate_lru_folios at ffffffffa597df53
    ffffc90006fb7c30: 0000000000000020 0000000000000000
    ffffc90006fb7c40: ffffc90006fb7d40 ffff88812cbd3000
    ffffc90006fb7c50: ffffc90006fb7d30 0000000106fb7de8
    ffffc90006fb7c60: ffffea04a2197008 ffffea0006ed4a48
    ffffc90006fb7c70: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
    ffffc90006fb7c80: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
    ffffc90006fb7c90: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
    ffffc90006fb7ca0: 0000000000000000 0000000003e3e937
    ffffc90006fb7cb0: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
    ffffc90006fb7cc0: 8d7c0b56b7874b00 ffff88812cbd3000

About the Fixes:
Why did it take eight years to be discovered?

The problem requires the following conditions to occur:
1. The device memory should be large enough.
2. Pages in the LRU(active_anon) list are mostly from the ZONE_NORMAL area.
3. The memory in ZONE_DMA32 needs to reach the watermark.

If the memory is not large enough, or if the usage design of ZONE_DMA32
area memory is reasonable, this problem is difficult to detect.

notes:
The problem is most likely to occur in ZONE_DMA32 and ZONE_NORMAL,
but other suitable scenarios may also trigger the problem.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241119060842.274072-1-liuye@kylinos.cn
Fixes: b2e1875 ("mm, vmscan: begin reclaiming pages on a per-node basis")
Signed-off-by: liuye <liuye@kylinos.cn>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Yang Shi <yang@os.amperecomputing.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
kdave pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 17, 2025
We have several places across the kernel where we want to access another
task's syscall arguments, such as ptrace(2), seccomp(2), etc., by making
a call to syscall_get_arguments().

This works for register arguments right away by accessing the task's
`regs' member of `struct pt_regs', however for stack arguments seen with
32-bit/o32 kernels things are more complicated.  Technically they ought
to be obtained from the user stack with calls to an access_remote_vm(),
but we have an easier way available already.

So as to be able to access syscall stack arguments as regular function
arguments following the MIPS calling convention we copy them over from
the user stack to the kernel stack in arch/mips/kernel/scall32-o32.S, in
handle_sys(), to the current stack frame's outgoing argument space at
the top of the stack, which is where the handler called expects to see
its incoming arguments.  This area is also pointed at by the `pt_regs'
pointer obtained by task_pt_regs().

Make the o32 stack argument space a proper member of `struct pt_regs'
then, by renaming the existing member from `pad0' to `args' and using
generated offsets to access the space.  No functional change though.

With the change in place the o32 kernel stack frame layout at the entry
to a syscall handler invoked by handle_sys() is therefore as follows:

$sp + 68 -> |         ...         | <- pt_regs.regs[9]
            +---------------------+
$sp + 64 -> |         $t0         | <- pt_regs.regs[8]
            +---------------------+
$sp + 60 -> |   $a3/argument #4   | <- pt_regs.regs[7]
            +---------------------+
$sp + 56 -> |   $a2/argument #3   | <- pt_regs.regs[6]
            +---------------------+
$sp + 52 -> |   $a1/argument #2   | <- pt_regs.regs[5]
            +---------------------+
$sp + 48 -> |   $a0/argument #1   | <- pt_regs.regs[4]
            +---------------------+
$sp + 44 -> |         $v1         | <- pt_regs.regs[3]
            +---------------------+
$sp + 40 -> |         $v0         | <- pt_regs.regs[2]
            +---------------------+
$sp + 36 -> |         $at         | <- pt_regs.regs[1]
            +---------------------+
$sp + 32 -> |        $zero        | <- pt_regs.regs[0]
            +---------------------+
$sp + 28 -> |  stack argument #8  | <- pt_regs.args[7]
            +---------------------+
$sp + 24 -> |  stack argument #7  | <- pt_regs.args[6]
            +---------------------+
$sp + 20 -> |  stack argument #6  | <- pt_regs.args[5]
            +---------------------+
$sp + 16 -> |  stack argument #5  | <- pt_regs.args[4]
            +---------------------+
$sp + 12 -> | psABI space for $a3 | <- pt_regs.args[3]
            +---------------------+
$sp +  8 -> | psABI space for $a2 | <- pt_regs.args[2]
            +---------------------+
$sp +  4 -> | psABI space for $a1 | <- pt_regs.args[1]
            +---------------------+
$sp +  0 -> | psABI space for $a0 | <- pt_regs.args[0]
            +---------------------+

holding user data received and with the first 4 frame slots reserved by
the psABI for the compiler to spill the incoming arguments from $a0-$a3
registers (which it sometimes does according to its needs) and the next
4 frame slots designated by the psABI for any stack function arguments
that follow.  This data is also available for other tasks to peek/poke
at as reqired and where permitted.

Signed-off-by: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@orcam.me.uk>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
kdave pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 10, 2025
Use raw_spinlock in order to fix spurious messages about invalid context
when spinlock debugging is enabled. The lock is only used to serialize
register access.

    [    4.239592] =============================
    [    4.239595] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ]
    [    4.239599] 6.13.0-rc7-arm64-renesas-05496-gd088502a519f torvalds#35 Not tainted
    [    4.239603] -----------------------------
    [    4.239606] kworker/u8:5/76 is trying to lock:
    [    4.239609] ffff0000091898a0 (&p->lock){....}-{3:3}, at: gpio_rcar_config_interrupt_input_mode+0x34/0x164
    [    4.239641] other info that might help us debug this:
    [    4.239643] context-{5:5}
    [    4.239646] 5 locks held by kworker/u8:5/76:
    [    4.239651]  #0: ffff0000080fb148 ((wq_completion)async){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x190/0x62c
    [    4.250180] OF: /soc/sound@ec500000/ports/port@0/endpoint: Read of boolean property 'frame-master' with a value.
    [    4.254094]  #1: ffff80008299bd80 ((work_completion)(&entry->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1b8/0x62c
    [    4.254109]  #2: ffff00000920c8f8
    [    4.258345] OF: /soc/sound@ec500000/ports/port@1/endpoint: Read of boolean property 'bitclock-master' with a value.
    [    4.264803]  (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: __device_attach_async_helper+0x3c/0xdc
    [    4.264820]  #3: ffff00000a50ca40 (request_class#2){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: __setup_irq+0xa0/0x690
    [    4.264840]  #4:
    [    4.268872] OF: /soc/sound@ec500000/ports/port@1/endpoint: Read of boolean property 'frame-master' with a value.
    [    4.273275] ffff00000a50c8c8 (lock_class){....}-{2:2}, at: __setup_irq+0xc4/0x690
    [    4.296130] renesas_sdhi_internal_dmac ee10000.mmc: mmc1 base at 0x00000000ee100000, max clock rate 200 MHz
    [    4.304082] stack backtrace:
    [    4.304086] CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 76 Comm: kworker/u8:5 Not tainted 6.13.0-rc7-arm64-renesas-05496-gd088502a519f torvalds#35
    [    4.304092] Hardware name: Renesas Salvator-X 2nd version board based on r8a77965 (DT)
    [    4.304097] Workqueue: async async_run_entry_fn
    [    4.304106] Call trace:
    [    4.304110]  show_stack+0x14/0x20 (C)
    [    4.304122]  dump_stack_lvl+0x6c/0x90
    [    4.304131]  dump_stack+0x14/0x1c
    [    4.304138]  __lock_acquire+0xdfc/0x1584
    [    4.426274]  lock_acquire+0x1c4/0x33c
    [    4.429942]  _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x5c/0x80
    [    4.434307]  gpio_rcar_config_interrupt_input_mode+0x34/0x164
    [    4.440061]  gpio_rcar_irq_set_type+0xd4/0xd8
    [    4.444422]  __irq_set_trigger+0x5c/0x178
    [    4.448435]  __setup_irq+0x2e4/0x690
    [    4.452012]  request_threaded_irq+0xc4/0x190
    [    4.456285]  devm_request_threaded_irq+0x7c/0xf4
    [    4.459398] ata1: link resume succeeded after 1 retries
    [    4.460902]  mmc_gpiod_request_cd_irq+0x68/0xe0
    [    4.470660]  mmc_start_host+0x50/0xac
    [    4.474327]  mmc_add_host+0x80/0xe4
    [    4.477817]  tmio_mmc_host_probe+0x2b0/0x440
    [    4.482094]  renesas_sdhi_probe+0x488/0x6f4
    [    4.486281]  renesas_sdhi_internal_dmac_probe+0x60/0x78
    [    4.491509]  platform_probe+0x64/0xd8
    [    4.495178]  really_probe+0xb8/0x2a8
    [    4.498756]  __driver_probe_device+0x74/0x118
    [    4.503116]  driver_probe_device+0x3c/0x154
    [    4.507303]  __device_attach_driver+0xd4/0x160
    [    4.511750]  bus_for_each_drv+0x84/0xe0
    [    4.515588]  __device_attach_async_helper+0xb0/0xdc
    [    4.520470]  async_run_entry_fn+0x30/0xd8
    [    4.524481]  process_one_work+0x210/0x62c
    [    4.528494]  worker_thread+0x1ac/0x340
    [    4.532245]  kthread+0x10c/0x110
    [    4.535476]  ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20

Signed-off-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se>
Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250121135833.3769310-1-niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>
kdave pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 10, 2025
…/kernel/git/kvmarm/kvmarm into HEAD

KVM/arm64 fixes for 6.14, take #4

- Fix a couple of bugs affecting pKVM's PSCI relay implementation
  when running in the hVHE mode, resulting in the host being entered
  with the MMU in an unknown state, and EL2 being in the wrong mode.
kdave pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 14, 2025
…cal section

A circular lock dependency splat has been seen involving down_trylock():

  ======================================================
  WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
  6.12.0-41.el10.s390x+debug
  ------------------------------------------------------
  dd/32479 is trying to acquire lock:
  0015a20accd0d4f8 ((console_sem).lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: down_trylock+0x26/0x90

  but task is already holding lock:
  000000017e461698 (&zone->lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: rmqueue_bulk+0xac/0x8f0

  the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
  -> #4 (&zone->lock){-.-.}-{2:2}:
  -> #3 (hrtimer_bases.lock){-.-.}-{2:2}:
  -> #2 (&rq->__lock){-.-.}-{2:2}:
  -> #1 (&p->pi_lock){-.-.}-{2:2}:
  -> #0 ((console_sem).lock){-.-.}-{2:2}:

The console_sem -> pi_lock dependency is due to calling try_to_wake_up()
while holding the console_sem raw_spinlock. This dependency can be broken
by using wake_q to do the wakeup instead of calling try_to_wake_up()
under the console_sem lock. This will also make the semaphore's
raw_spinlock become a terminal lock without taking any further locks
underneath it.

The hrtimer_bases.lock is a raw_spinlock while zone->lock is a
spinlock. The hrtimer_bases.lock -> zone->lock dependency happens via
the debug_objects_fill_pool() helper function in the debugobjects code.

  -> #4 (&zone->lock){-.-.}-{2:2}:
         __lock_acquire+0xe86/0x1cc0
         lock_acquire.part.0+0x258/0x630
         lock_acquire+0xb8/0xe0
         _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0xb4/0x120
         rmqueue_bulk+0xac/0x8f0
         __rmqueue_pcplist+0x580/0x830
         rmqueue_pcplist+0xfc/0x470
         rmqueue.isra.0+0xdec/0x11b0
         get_page_from_freelist+0x2ee/0xeb0
         __alloc_pages_noprof+0x2c2/0x520
         alloc_pages_mpol_noprof+0x1fc/0x4d0
         alloc_pages_noprof+0x8c/0xe0
         allocate_slab+0x320/0x460
         ___slab_alloc+0xa58/0x12b0
         __slab_alloc.isra.0+0x42/0x60
         kmem_cache_alloc_noprof+0x304/0x350
         fill_pool+0xf6/0x450
         debug_object_activate+0xfe/0x360
         enqueue_hrtimer+0x34/0x190
         __run_hrtimer+0x3c8/0x4c0
         __hrtimer_run_queues+0x1b2/0x260
         hrtimer_interrupt+0x316/0x760
         do_IRQ+0x9a/0xe0
         do_irq_async+0xf6/0x160

Normally a raw_spinlock to spinlock dependency is not legitimate
and will be warned if CONFIG_PROVE_RAW_LOCK_NESTING is enabled,
but debug_objects_fill_pool() is an exception as it explicitly
allows this dependency for non-PREEMPT_RT kernel without causing
PROVE_RAW_LOCK_NESTING lockdep splat. As a result, this dependency is
legitimate and not a bug.

Anyway, semaphore is the only locking primitive left that is still
using try_to_wake_up() to do wakeup inside critical section, all the
other locking primitives had been migrated to use wake_q to do wakeup
outside of the critical section. It is also possible that there are
other circular locking dependencies involving printk/console_sem or
other existing/new semaphores lurking somewhere which may show up in
the future. Let just do the migration now to wake_q to avoid headache
like this.

Reported-by: yzbot+ed801a886dfdbfe7136d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250307232717.1759087-3-boqun.feng@gmail.com
kdave pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 31, 2025
perf test 11 hwmon fails on s390 with this error

 # ./perf test -Fv 11
 --- start ---
 ---- end ----
 11.1: Basic parsing test             : Ok
 --- start ---
 Testing 'temp_test_hwmon_event1'
 Using CPUID IBM,3931,704,A01,3.7,002f
 temp_test_hwmon_event1 -> hwmon_a_test_hwmon_pmu/temp_test_hwmon_event1/
 FAILED tests/hwmon_pmu.c:189 Unexpected config for
    'temp_test_hwmon_event1', 292470092988416 != 655361
 ---- end ----
 11.2: Parsing without PMU name       : FAILED!
 --- start ---
 Testing 'hwmon_a_test_hwmon_pmu/temp_test_hwmon_event1/'
 FAILED tests/hwmon_pmu.c:189 Unexpected config for
    'hwmon_a_test_hwmon_pmu/temp_test_hwmon_event1/',
    292470092988416 != 655361
 ---- end ----
 11.3: Parsing with PMU name          : FAILED!
 #

The root cause is in member test_event::config which is initialized
to 0xA0001 or 655361. During event parsing a long list event parsing
functions are called and end up with this gdb call stack:

 #0  hwmon_pmu__config_term (hwm=0x168dfd0, attr=0x3ffffff5ee8,
	term=0x168db60, err=0x3ffffff81c8) at util/hwmon_pmu.c:623
 #1  hwmon_pmu__config_terms (pmu=0x168dfd0, attr=0x3ffffff5ee8,
	terms=0x3ffffff5ea8, err=0x3ffffff81c8) at util/hwmon_pmu.c:662
 #2  0x00000000012f870c in perf_pmu__config_terms (pmu=0x168dfd0,
	attr=0x3ffffff5ee8, terms=0x3ffffff5ea8, zero=false,
	apply_hardcoded=false, err=0x3ffffff81c8) at util/pmu.c:1519
 #3  0x00000000012f88a4 in perf_pmu__config (pmu=0x168dfd0, attr=0x3ffffff5ee8,
	head_terms=0x3ffffff5ea8, apply_hardcoded=false, err=0x3ffffff81c8)
	at util/pmu.c:1545
 #4  0x00000000012680c4 in parse_events_add_pmu (parse_state=0x3ffffff7fb8,
	list=0x168dc00, pmu=0x168dfd0, const_parsed_terms=0x3ffffff6090,
	auto_merge_stats=true, alternate_hw_config=10)
	at util/parse-events.c:1508
 #5  0x00000000012684c6 in parse_events_multi_pmu_add (parse_state=0x3ffffff7fb8,
	event_name=0x168ec10 "temp_test_hwmon_event1", hw_config=10,
	const_parsed_terms=0x0, listp=0x3ffffff6230, loc_=0x3ffffff70e0)
	at util/parse-events.c:1592
 #6  0x00000000012f0e4e in parse_events_parse (_parse_state=0x3ffffff7fb8,
	scanner=0x16878c0) at util/parse-events.y:293
 #7  0x00000000012695a0 in parse_events__scanner (str=0x3ffffff81d8
	"temp_test_hwmon_event1", input=0x0, parse_state=0x3ffffff7fb8)
	at util/parse-events.c:1867
 #8  0x000000000126a1e8 in __parse_events (evlist=0x168b580,
	str=0x3ffffff81d8 "temp_test_hwmon_event1", pmu_filter=0x0,
	err=0x3ffffff81c8, fake_pmu=false, warn_if_reordered=true,
	fake_tp=false) at util/parse-events.c:2136
 #9  0x00000000011e36aa in parse_events (evlist=0x168b580,
	str=0x3ffffff81d8 "temp_test_hwmon_event1", err=0x3ffffff81c8)
	at /root/linux/tools/perf/util/parse-events.h:41
 #10 0x00000000011e3e64 in do_test (i=0, with_pmu=false, with_alias=false)
	at tests/hwmon_pmu.c:164
 torvalds#11 0x00000000011e422c in test__hwmon_pmu (with_pmu=false)
	at tests/hwmon_pmu.c:219
 torvalds#12 0x00000000011e431c in test__hwmon_pmu_without_pmu (test=0x1610368
	<suite.hwmon_pmu>, subtest=1) at tests/hwmon_pmu.c:23

where the attr::config is set to value 292470092988416 or 0x10a0000000000
in line 625 of file ./util/hwmon_pmu.c:

   attr->config = key.type_and_num;

However member key::type_and_num is defined as union and bit field:

   union hwmon_pmu_event_key {
        long type_and_num;
        struct {
                int num :16;
                enum hwmon_type type :8;
        };
   };

s390 is big endian and Intel is little endian architecture.
The events for the hwmon dummy pmu have num = 1 or num = 2 and
type is set to HWMON_TYPE_TEMP (which is 10).
On s390 this assignes member key::type_and_num the value of
0x10a0000000000 (which is 292470092988416) as shown in above
trace output.

Fix this and export the structure/union hwmon_pmu_event_key
so the test shares the same implementation as the event parsing
functions for union and bit fields. This should avoid
endianess issues on all platforms.

Output after:
 # ./perf test -F 11
 11.1: Basic parsing test         : Ok
 11.2: Parsing without PMU name   : Ok
 11.3: Parsing with PMU name      : Ok
 #

Fixes: 531ee0f ("perf test: Add hwmon "PMU" test")
Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250131112400.568975-1-tmricht@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
kdave pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 31, 2025
Ian told me that there are many memory leaks in the hierarchy mode.  I
can easily reproduce it with the follwing command.

  $ make DEBUG=1 EXTRA_CFLAGS=-fsanitize=leak

  $ perf record --latency -g -- ./perf test -w thloop

  $ perf report -H --stdio
  ...
  Indirect leak of 168 byte(s) in 21 object(s) allocated from:
      #0 0x7f3414c16c65 in malloc ../../../../src/libsanitizer/lsan/lsan_interceptors.cpp:75
      #1 0x55ed3602346e in map__get util/map.h:189
      #2 0x55ed36024cc4 in hist_entry__init util/hist.c:476
      #3 0x55ed36025208 in hist_entry__new util/hist.c:588
      #4 0x55ed36027c05 in hierarchy_insert_entry util/hist.c:1587
      #5 0x55ed36027e2e in hists__hierarchy_insert_entry util/hist.c:1638
      #6 0x55ed36027fa4 in hists__collapse_insert_entry util/hist.c:1685
      #7 0x55ed360283e8 in hists__collapse_resort util/hist.c:1776
      #8 0x55ed35de0323 in report__collapse_hists /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/builtin-report.c:735
      #9 0x55ed35de15b4 in __cmd_report /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/builtin-report.c:1119
      #10 0x55ed35de43dc in cmd_report /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/builtin-report.c:1867
      torvalds#11 0x55ed35e66767 in run_builtin /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:351
      torvalds#12 0x55ed35e66a0e in handle_internal_command /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:404
      torvalds#13 0x55ed35e66b67 in run_argv /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:448
      torvalds#14 0x55ed35e66eb0 in main /home/namhyung/project/linux/tools/perf/perf.c:556
      torvalds#15 0x7f340ac33d67 in __libc_start_call_main ../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58
  ...

  $ perf report -H --stdio 2>&1 | grep -c '^Indirect leak'
  93

I found that hist_entry__delete() missed to release child entries in the
hierarchy tree (hroot_{in,out}).  It needs to iterate the child entries
and call hist_entry__delete() recursively.

After this change:

  $ perf report -H --stdio 2>&1 | grep -c '^Indirect leak'
  0

Reported-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Tested-by Thomas Falcon <thomas.falcon@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250307061250.320849-2-namhyung@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
kdave pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 31, 2025
The env.pmu_mapping can be leaked when it reads data from a pipe on AMD.
For a pipe data, it reads the header data including pmu_mapping from
PERF_RECORD_HEADER_FEATURE runtime.  But it's already set in:

  perf_session__new()
    __perf_session__new()
      evlist__init_trace_event_sample_raw()
        evlist__has_amd_ibs()
          perf_env__nr_pmu_mappings()

Then it'll overwrite that when it processes the HEADER_FEATURE record.
Here's a report from address sanitizer.

  Direct leak of 2689 byte(s) in 1 object(s) allocated from:
    #0 0x7fed8f814596 in realloc ../../../../src/libsanitizer/lsan/lsan_interceptors.cpp:98
    #1 0x5595a7d416b1 in strbuf_grow util/strbuf.c:64
    #2 0x5595a7d414ef in strbuf_init util/strbuf.c:25
    #3 0x5595a7d0f4b7 in perf_env__read_pmu_mappings util/env.c:362
    #4 0x5595a7d12ab7 in perf_env__nr_pmu_mappings util/env.c:517
    #5 0x5595a7d89d2f in evlist__has_amd_ibs util/amd-sample-raw.c:315
    #6 0x5595a7d87fb2 in evlist__init_trace_event_sample_raw util/sample-raw.c:23
    #7 0x5595a7d7f893 in __perf_session__new util/session.c:179
    #8 0x5595a7b79572 in perf_session__new util/session.h:115
    #9 0x5595a7b7e9dc in cmd_report builtin-report.c:1603
    #10 0x5595a7c019eb in run_builtin perf.c:351
    torvalds#11 0x5595a7c01c92 in handle_internal_command perf.c:404
    torvalds#12 0x5595a7c01deb in run_argv perf.c:448
    torvalds#13 0x5595a7c02134 in main perf.c:556
    torvalds#14 0x7fed85833d67 in __libc_start_call_main ../sysdeps/nptl/libc_start_call_main.h:58

Let's free the existing pmu_mapping data if any.

Cc: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250311000416.817631-1-namhyung@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
kdave pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 3, 2025
When a bio with REQ_PREFLUSH is submitted to dm, __send_empty_flush()
generates a flush_bio with REQ_OP_WRITE | REQ_PREFLUSH | REQ_SYNC,
which causes the flush_bio to be throttled by wbt_wait().

An example from v5.4, similar problem also exists in upstream:

    crash> bt 2091206
    PID: 2091206  TASK: ffff2050df92a300  CPU: 109  COMMAND: "kworker/u260:0"
     #0 [ffff800084a2f7f0] __switch_to at ffff80004008aeb8
     #1 [ffff800084a2f820] __schedule at ffff800040bfa0c4
     #2 [ffff800084a2f880] schedule at ffff800040bfa4b4
     #3 [ffff800084a2f8a0] io_schedule at ffff800040bfa9c4
     #4 [ffff800084a2f8c0] rq_qos_wait at ffff8000405925bc
     #5 [ffff800084a2f940] wbt_wait at ffff8000405bb3a0
     #6 [ffff800084a2f9a0] __rq_qos_throttle at ffff800040592254
     #7 [ffff800084a2f9c0] blk_mq_make_request at ffff80004057cf38
     #8 [ffff800084a2fa60] generic_make_request at ffff800040570138
     #9 [ffff800084a2fae0] submit_bio at ffff8000405703b4
    #10 [ffff800084a2fb50] xlog_write_iclog at ffff800001280834 [xfs]
    torvalds#11 [ffff800084a2fbb0] xlog_sync at ffff800001280c3c [xfs]
    torvalds#12 [ffff800084a2fbf0] xlog_state_release_iclog at ffff800001280df4 [xfs]
    torvalds#13 [ffff800084a2fc10] xlog_write at ffff80000128203c [xfs]
    torvalds#14 [ffff800084a2fcd0] xlog_cil_push at ffff8000012846dc [xfs]
    torvalds#15 [ffff800084a2fda0] xlog_cil_push_work at ffff800001284a2c [xfs]
    torvalds#16 [ffff800084a2fdb0] process_one_work at ffff800040111d08
    torvalds#17 [ffff800084a2fe00] worker_thread at ffff8000401121cc
    torvalds#18 [ffff800084a2fe70] kthread at ffff800040118de4

After commit 2def284 ("xfs: don't allow log IO to be throttled"),
the metadata submitted by xlog_write_iclog() should not be throttled.
But due to the existence of the dm layer, throttling flush_bio indirectly
causes the metadata bio to be throttled.

Fix this by conditionally adding REQ_IDLE to flush_bio.bi_opf, which makes
wbt_should_throttle() return false to avoid wbt_wait().

Signed-off-by: Jinliang Zheng <alexjlzheng@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: Tianxiang Peng <txpeng@tencent.com>
Reviewed-by: Hao Peng <flyingpeng@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
kdave pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 3, 2025
There is a potential deadlock if we do report zones in an IO context, detailed
in below lockdep report. When one process do a report zones and another process
freezes the block device, the report zones side cannot allocate a tag because
the freeze is already started. This can thus result in new block group creation
to hang forever, blocking the write path.

Thankfully, a new block group should be created on empty zones. So, reporting
the zones is not necessary and we can set the write pointer = 0 and load the
zone capacity from the block layer using bdev_zone_capacity() helper.

 ======================================================
 WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
 6.14.0-rc1 torvalds#252 Not tainted
 ------------------------------------------------------
 modprobe/1110 is trying to acquire lock:
 ffff888100ac83e0 ((work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0x38f/0xb60

 but task is already holding lock:
 ffff8881205b6f20 (&q->q_usage_counter(queue)torvalds#16){++++}-{0:0}, at: sd_remove+0x85/0x130

 which lock already depends on the new lock.

 the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

 -> #3 (&q->q_usage_counter(queue)torvalds#16){++++}-{0:0}:
        blk_queue_enter+0x3d9/0x500
        blk_mq_alloc_request+0x47d/0x8e0
        scsi_execute_cmd+0x14f/0xb80
        sd_zbc_do_report_zones+0x1c1/0x470
        sd_zbc_report_zones+0x362/0xd60
        blkdev_report_zones+0x1b1/0x2e0
        btrfs_get_dev_zones+0x215/0x7e0 [btrfs]
        btrfs_load_block_group_zone_info+0x6d2/0x2c10 [btrfs]
        btrfs_make_block_group+0x36b/0x870 [btrfs]
        btrfs_create_chunk+0x147d/0x2320 [btrfs]
        btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x2ce/0xcf0 [btrfs]
        start_transaction+0xce6/0x1620 [btrfs]
        btrfs_uuid_scan_kthread+0x4ee/0x5b0 [btrfs]
        kthread+0x39d/0x750
        ret_from_fork+0x30/0x70
        ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30

 -> #2 (&fs_info->dev_replace.rwsem){++++}-{4:4}:
        down_read+0x9b/0x470
        btrfs_map_block+0x2ce/0x2ce0 [btrfs]
        btrfs_submit_chunk+0x2d4/0x16c0 [btrfs]
        btrfs_submit_bbio+0x16/0x30 [btrfs]
        btree_write_cache_pages+0xb5a/0xf90 [btrfs]
        do_writepages+0x17f/0x7b0
        __writeback_single_inode+0x114/0xb00
        writeback_sb_inodes+0x52b/0xe00
        wb_writeback+0x1a7/0x800
        wb_workfn+0x12a/0xbd0
        process_one_work+0x85a/0x1460
        worker_thread+0x5e2/0xfc0
        kthread+0x39d/0x750
        ret_from_fork+0x30/0x70
        ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30

 -> #1 (&fs_info->zoned_meta_io_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}:
        __mutex_lock+0x1aa/0x1360
        btree_write_cache_pages+0x252/0xf90 [btrfs]
        do_writepages+0x17f/0x7b0
        __writeback_single_inode+0x114/0xb00
        writeback_sb_inodes+0x52b/0xe00
        wb_writeback+0x1a7/0x800
        wb_workfn+0x12a/0xbd0
        process_one_work+0x85a/0x1460
        worker_thread+0x5e2/0xfc0
        kthread+0x39d/0x750
        ret_from_fork+0x30/0x70
        ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30

 -> #0 ((work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}:
        __lock_acquire+0x2f52/0x5ea0
        lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x540
        __flush_work+0x3ac/0xb60
        wb_shutdown+0x15b/0x1f0
        bdi_unregister+0x172/0x5b0
        del_gendisk+0x841/0xa20
        sd_remove+0x85/0x130
        device_release_driver_internal+0x368/0x520
        bus_remove_device+0x1f1/0x3f0
        device_del+0x3bd/0x9c0
        __scsi_remove_device+0x272/0x340
        scsi_forget_host+0xf7/0x170
        scsi_remove_host+0xd2/0x2a0
        sdebug_driver_remove+0x52/0x2f0 [scsi_debug]
        device_release_driver_internal+0x368/0x520
        bus_remove_device+0x1f1/0x3f0
        device_del+0x3bd/0x9c0
        device_unregister+0x13/0xa0
        sdebug_do_remove_host+0x1fb/0x290 [scsi_debug]
        scsi_debug_exit+0x17/0x70 [scsi_debug]
        __do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x321/0x520
        do_syscall_64+0x93/0x180
        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

 other info that might help us debug this:

 Chain exists of:
   (work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work) --> &fs_info->dev_replace.rwsem --> &q->q_usage_counter(queue)torvalds#16

  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

        CPU0                    CPU1
        ----                    ----
   lock(&q->q_usage_counter(queue)torvalds#16);
                                lock(&fs_info->dev_replace.rwsem);
                                lock(&q->q_usage_counter(queue)torvalds#16);
   lock((work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work));

  *** DEADLOCK ***

 5 locks held by modprobe/1110:
  #0: ffff88811f7bc108 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x8f/0x520
  #1: ffff8881022ee0e0 (&shost->scan_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: scsi_remove_host+0x20/0x2a0
  #2: ffff88811b4c4378 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x8f/0x520
  #3: ffff8881205b6f20 (&q->q_usage_counter(queue)torvalds#16){++++}-{0:0}, at: sd_remove+0x85/0x130
  #4: ffffffffa3284360 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: __flush_work+0xda/0xb60

 stack backtrace:
 CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 1110 Comm: modprobe Not tainted 6.14.0-rc1 torvalds#252
 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-3.fc41 04/01/2014
 Call Trace:
  <TASK>
  dump_stack_lvl+0x6a/0x90
  print_circular_bug.cold+0x1e0/0x274
  check_noncircular+0x306/0x3f0
  ? __pfx_check_noncircular+0x10/0x10
  ? mark_lock+0xf5/0x1650
  ? __pfx_check_irq_usage+0x10/0x10
  ? lockdep_lock+0xca/0x1c0
  ? __pfx_lockdep_lock+0x10/0x10
  __lock_acquire+0x2f52/0x5ea0
  ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx_mark_lock+0x10/0x10
  lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x540
  ? __flush_work+0x38f/0xb60
  ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx_lock_release+0x10/0x10
  ? mark_held_locks+0x94/0xe0
  ? __flush_work+0x38f/0xb60
  __flush_work+0x3ac/0xb60
  ? __flush_work+0x38f/0xb60
  ? __pfx_mark_lock+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx___flush_work+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx_wq_barrier_func+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx___might_resched+0x10/0x10
  ? mark_held_locks+0x94/0xe0
  wb_shutdown+0x15b/0x1f0
  bdi_unregister+0x172/0x5b0
  ? __pfx_bdi_unregister+0x10/0x10
  ? up_write+0x1ba/0x510
  del_gendisk+0x841/0xa20
  ? __pfx_del_gendisk+0x10/0x10
  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x35/0x60
  ? __pm_runtime_resume+0x79/0x110
  sd_remove+0x85/0x130
  device_release_driver_internal+0x368/0x520
  ? kobject_put+0x5d/0x4a0
  bus_remove_device+0x1f1/0x3f0
  device_del+0x3bd/0x9c0
  ? __pfx_device_del+0x10/0x10
  __scsi_remove_device+0x272/0x340
  scsi_forget_host+0xf7/0x170
  scsi_remove_host+0xd2/0x2a0
  sdebug_driver_remove+0x52/0x2f0 [scsi_debug]
  ? kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0xc0/0xf0
  device_release_driver_internal+0x368/0x520
  ? kobject_put+0x5d/0x4a0
  bus_remove_device+0x1f1/0x3f0
  device_del+0x3bd/0x9c0
  ? __pfx_device_del+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx___mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x10/0x10
  device_unregister+0x13/0xa0
  sdebug_do_remove_host+0x1fb/0x290 [scsi_debug]
  scsi_debug_exit+0x17/0x70 [scsi_debug]
  __do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x321/0x520
  ? __pfx___do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx_slab_free_after_rcu_debug+0x10/0x10
  ? kasan_save_stack+0x2c/0x50
  ? kasan_record_aux_stack+0xa3/0xb0
  ? __call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0xc4/0xfb0
  ? kmem_cache_free+0x3a0/0x590
  ? __x64_sys_close+0x78/0xd0
  do_syscall_64+0x93/0x180
  ? lock_is_held_type+0xd5/0x130
  ? __call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0x3c0/0xfb0
  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x78/0x100
  ? __call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0x3c0/0xfb0
  ? __pfx___call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0x10/0x10
  ? kmem_cache_free+0x3a0/0x590
  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x16d/0x400
  ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x78/0x100
  ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
  ? __pfx___x64_sys_openat+0x10/0x10
  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x16d/0x400
  ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x78/0x100
  ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
 RIP: 0033:0x7f436712b68b
 RSP: 002b:00007ffe9f1a8658 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000b0
 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00005559b367fd80 RCX: 00007f436712b68b
 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000800 RDI: 00005559b367fde8
 RBP: 00007ffe9f1a8680 R08: 1999999999999999 R09: 0000000000000000
 R10: 00007f43671a5fe0 R11: 0000000000000206 R12: 0000000000000000
 R13: 00007ffe9f1a86b0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
  </TASK>

Reported-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 6.13+
Tested-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
kdave pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 4, 2025
There is a potential deadlock if we do report zones in an IO context, detailed
in below lockdep report. When one process do a report zones and another process
freezes the block device, the report zones side cannot allocate a tag because
the freeze is already started. This can thus result in new block group creation
to hang forever, blocking the write path.

Thankfully, a new block group should be created on empty zones. So, reporting
the zones is not necessary and we can set the write pointer = 0 and load the
zone capacity from the block layer using bdev_zone_capacity() helper.

 ======================================================
 WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
 6.14.0-rc1 torvalds#252 Not tainted
 ------------------------------------------------------
 modprobe/1110 is trying to acquire lock:
 ffff888100ac83e0 ((work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0x38f/0xb60

 but task is already holding lock:
 ffff8881205b6f20 (&q->q_usage_counter(queue)torvalds#16){++++}-{0:0}, at: sd_remove+0x85/0x130

 which lock already depends on the new lock.

 the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

 -> #3 (&q->q_usage_counter(queue)torvalds#16){++++}-{0:0}:
        blk_queue_enter+0x3d9/0x500
        blk_mq_alloc_request+0x47d/0x8e0
        scsi_execute_cmd+0x14f/0xb80
        sd_zbc_do_report_zones+0x1c1/0x470
        sd_zbc_report_zones+0x362/0xd60
        blkdev_report_zones+0x1b1/0x2e0
        btrfs_get_dev_zones+0x215/0x7e0 [btrfs]
        btrfs_load_block_group_zone_info+0x6d2/0x2c10 [btrfs]
        btrfs_make_block_group+0x36b/0x870 [btrfs]
        btrfs_create_chunk+0x147d/0x2320 [btrfs]
        btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x2ce/0xcf0 [btrfs]
        start_transaction+0xce6/0x1620 [btrfs]
        btrfs_uuid_scan_kthread+0x4ee/0x5b0 [btrfs]
        kthread+0x39d/0x750
        ret_from_fork+0x30/0x70
        ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30

 -> #2 (&fs_info->dev_replace.rwsem){++++}-{4:4}:
        down_read+0x9b/0x470
        btrfs_map_block+0x2ce/0x2ce0 [btrfs]
        btrfs_submit_chunk+0x2d4/0x16c0 [btrfs]
        btrfs_submit_bbio+0x16/0x30 [btrfs]
        btree_write_cache_pages+0xb5a/0xf90 [btrfs]
        do_writepages+0x17f/0x7b0
        __writeback_single_inode+0x114/0xb00
        writeback_sb_inodes+0x52b/0xe00
        wb_writeback+0x1a7/0x800
        wb_workfn+0x12a/0xbd0
        process_one_work+0x85a/0x1460
        worker_thread+0x5e2/0xfc0
        kthread+0x39d/0x750
        ret_from_fork+0x30/0x70
        ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30

 -> #1 (&fs_info->zoned_meta_io_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}:
        __mutex_lock+0x1aa/0x1360
        btree_write_cache_pages+0x252/0xf90 [btrfs]
        do_writepages+0x17f/0x7b0
        __writeback_single_inode+0x114/0xb00
        writeback_sb_inodes+0x52b/0xe00
        wb_writeback+0x1a7/0x800
        wb_workfn+0x12a/0xbd0
        process_one_work+0x85a/0x1460
        worker_thread+0x5e2/0xfc0
        kthread+0x39d/0x750
        ret_from_fork+0x30/0x70
        ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30

 -> #0 ((work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}:
        __lock_acquire+0x2f52/0x5ea0
        lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x540
        __flush_work+0x3ac/0xb60
        wb_shutdown+0x15b/0x1f0
        bdi_unregister+0x172/0x5b0
        del_gendisk+0x841/0xa20
        sd_remove+0x85/0x130
        device_release_driver_internal+0x368/0x520
        bus_remove_device+0x1f1/0x3f0
        device_del+0x3bd/0x9c0
        __scsi_remove_device+0x272/0x340
        scsi_forget_host+0xf7/0x170
        scsi_remove_host+0xd2/0x2a0
        sdebug_driver_remove+0x52/0x2f0 [scsi_debug]
        device_release_driver_internal+0x368/0x520
        bus_remove_device+0x1f1/0x3f0
        device_del+0x3bd/0x9c0
        device_unregister+0x13/0xa0
        sdebug_do_remove_host+0x1fb/0x290 [scsi_debug]
        scsi_debug_exit+0x17/0x70 [scsi_debug]
        __do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x321/0x520
        do_syscall_64+0x93/0x180
        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

 other info that might help us debug this:

 Chain exists of:
   (work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work) --> &fs_info->dev_replace.rwsem --> &q->q_usage_counter(queue)torvalds#16

  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

        CPU0                    CPU1
        ----                    ----
   lock(&q->q_usage_counter(queue)torvalds#16);
                                lock(&fs_info->dev_replace.rwsem);
                                lock(&q->q_usage_counter(queue)torvalds#16);
   lock((work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work));

  *** DEADLOCK ***

 5 locks held by modprobe/1110:
  #0: ffff88811f7bc108 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x8f/0x520
  #1: ffff8881022ee0e0 (&shost->scan_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: scsi_remove_host+0x20/0x2a0
  #2: ffff88811b4c4378 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x8f/0x520
  #3: ffff8881205b6f20 (&q->q_usage_counter(queue)torvalds#16){++++}-{0:0}, at: sd_remove+0x85/0x130
  #4: ffffffffa3284360 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: __flush_work+0xda/0xb60

 stack backtrace:
 CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 1110 Comm: modprobe Not tainted 6.14.0-rc1 torvalds#252
 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-3.fc41 04/01/2014
 Call Trace:
  <TASK>
  dump_stack_lvl+0x6a/0x90
  print_circular_bug.cold+0x1e0/0x274
  check_noncircular+0x306/0x3f0
  ? __pfx_check_noncircular+0x10/0x10
  ? mark_lock+0xf5/0x1650
  ? __pfx_check_irq_usage+0x10/0x10
  ? lockdep_lock+0xca/0x1c0
  ? __pfx_lockdep_lock+0x10/0x10
  __lock_acquire+0x2f52/0x5ea0
  ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx_mark_lock+0x10/0x10
  lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x540
  ? __flush_work+0x38f/0xb60
  ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx_lock_release+0x10/0x10
  ? mark_held_locks+0x94/0xe0
  ? __flush_work+0x38f/0xb60
  __flush_work+0x3ac/0xb60
  ? __flush_work+0x38f/0xb60
  ? __pfx_mark_lock+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx___flush_work+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx_wq_barrier_func+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx___might_resched+0x10/0x10
  ? mark_held_locks+0x94/0xe0
  wb_shutdown+0x15b/0x1f0
  bdi_unregister+0x172/0x5b0
  ? __pfx_bdi_unregister+0x10/0x10
  ? up_write+0x1ba/0x510
  del_gendisk+0x841/0xa20
  ? __pfx_del_gendisk+0x10/0x10
  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x35/0x60
  ? __pm_runtime_resume+0x79/0x110
  sd_remove+0x85/0x130
  device_release_driver_internal+0x368/0x520
  ? kobject_put+0x5d/0x4a0
  bus_remove_device+0x1f1/0x3f0
  device_del+0x3bd/0x9c0
  ? __pfx_device_del+0x10/0x10
  __scsi_remove_device+0x272/0x340
  scsi_forget_host+0xf7/0x170
  scsi_remove_host+0xd2/0x2a0
  sdebug_driver_remove+0x52/0x2f0 [scsi_debug]
  ? kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0xc0/0xf0
  device_release_driver_internal+0x368/0x520
  ? kobject_put+0x5d/0x4a0
  bus_remove_device+0x1f1/0x3f0
  device_del+0x3bd/0x9c0
  ? __pfx_device_del+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx___mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x10/0x10
  device_unregister+0x13/0xa0
  sdebug_do_remove_host+0x1fb/0x290 [scsi_debug]
  scsi_debug_exit+0x17/0x70 [scsi_debug]
  __do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x321/0x520
  ? __pfx___do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx_slab_free_after_rcu_debug+0x10/0x10
  ? kasan_save_stack+0x2c/0x50
  ? kasan_record_aux_stack+0xa3/0xb0
  ? __call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0xc4/0xfb0
  ? kmem_cache_free+0x3a0/0x590
  ? __x64_sys_close+0x78/0xd0
  do_syscall_64+0x93/0x180
  ? lock_is_held_type+0xd5/0x130
  ? __call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0x3c0/0xfb0
  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x78/0x100
  ? __call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0x3c0/0xfb0
  ? __pfx___call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0x10/0x10
  ? kmem_cache_free+0x3a0/0x590
  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x16d/0x400
  ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x78/0x100
  ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
  ? __pfx___x64_sys_openat+0x10/0x10
  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x16d/0x400
  ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x78/0x100
  ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
 RIP: 0033:0x7f436712b68b
 RSP: 002b:00007ffe9f1a8658 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000b0
 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00005559b367fd80 RCX: 00007f436712b68b
 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000800 RDI: 00005559b367fde8
 RBP: 00007ffe9f1a8680 R08: 1999999999999999 R09: 0000000000000000
 R10: 00007f43671a5fe0 R11: 0000000000000206 R12: 0000000000000000
 R13: 00007ffe9f1a86b0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
  </TASK>

Reported-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 6.13+
Tested-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
kdave pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 7, 2025
v2:
- Created a single error handling unlock and exit in veth_pool_store
- Greatly expanded commit message with previous explanatory-only text

Summary: Use rtnl_mutex to synchronize veth_pool_store with itself,
ibmveth_close and ibmveth_open, preventing multiple calls in a row to
napi_disable.

Background: Two (or more) threads could call veth_pool_store through
writing to /sys/devices/vio/30000002/pool*/*. You can do this easily
with a little shell script. This causes a hang.

I configured LOCKDEP, compiled ibmveth.c with DEBUG, and built a new
kernel. I ran this test again and saw:

    Setting pool0/active to 0
    Setting pool1/active to 1
    [   73.911067][ T4365] ibmveth 30000002 eth0: close starting
    Setting pool1/active to 1
    Setting pool1/active to 0
    [   73.911367][ T4366] ibmveth 30000002 eth0: close starting
    [   73.916056][ T4365] ibmveth 30000002 eth0: close complete
    [   73.916064][ T4365] ibmveth 30000002 eth0: open starting
    [  110.808564][  T712] systemd-journald[712]: Sent WATCHDOG=1 notification.
    [  230.808495][  T712] systemd-journald[712]: Sent WATCHDOG=1 notification.
    [  243.683786][  T123] INFO: task stress.sh:4365 blocked for more than 122 seconds.
    [  243.683827][  T123]       Not tainted 6.14.0-01103-g2df0c02dab82-dirty #8
    [  243.683833][  T123] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
    [  243.683838][  T123] task:stress.sh       state:D stack:28096 pid:4365  tgid:4365  ppid:4364   task_flags:0x400040 flags:0x00042000
    [  243.683852][  T123] Call Trace:
    [  243.683857][  T123] [c00000000c38f690] [0000000000000001] 0x1 (unreliable)
    [  243.683868][  T123] [c00000000c38f840] [c00000000001f908] __switch_to+0x318/0x4e0
    [  243.683878][  T123] [c00000000c38f8a0] [c000000001549a70] __schedule+0x500/0x12a0
    [  243.683888][  T123] [c00000000c38f9a0] [c00000000154a878] schedule+0x68/0x210
    [  243.683896][  T123] [c00000000c38f9d0] [c00000000154ac80] schedule_preempt_disabled+0x30/0x50
    [  243.683904][  T123] [c00000000c38fa00] [c00000000154dbb0] __mutex_lock+0x730/0x10f0
    [  243.683913][  T123] [c00000000c38fb10] [c000000001154d40] napi_enable+0x30/0x60
    [  243.683921][  T123] [c00000000c38fb40] [c000000000f4ae94] ibmveth_open+0x68/0x5dc
    [  243.683928][  T123] [c00000000c38fbe0] [c000000000f4aa20] veth_pool_store+0x220/0x270
    [  243.683936][  T123] [c00000000c38fc70] [c000000000826278] sysfs_kf_write+0x68/0xb0
    [  243.683944][  T123] [c00000000c38fcb0] [c0000000008240b8] kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x198/0x2d0
    [  243.683951][  T123] [c00000000c38fd00] [c00000000071b9ac] vfs_write+0x34c/0x650
    [  243.683958][  T123] [c00000000c38fdc0] [c00000000071bea8] ksys_write+0x88/0x150
    [  243.683966][  T123] [c00000000c38fe10] [c0000000000317f4] system_call_exception+0x124/0x340
    [  243.683973][  T123] [c00000000c38fe50] [c00000000000d05c] system_call_vectored_common+0x15c/0x2ec
    ...
    [  243.684087][  T123] Showing all locks held in the system:
    [  243.684095][  T123] 1 lock held by khungtaskd/123:
    [  243.684099][  T123]  #0: c00000000278e370 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: debug_show_all_locks+0x50/0x248
    [  243.684114][  T123] 4 locks held by stress.sh/4365:
    [  243.684119][  T123]  #0: c00000003a4cd3f8 (sb_writers#3){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ksys_write+0x88/0x150
    [  243.684132][  T123]  #1: c000000041aea888 (&of->mutex#2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x154/0x2d0
    [  243.684143][  T123]  #2: c0000000366fb9a8 (kn->active#64){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x160/0x2d0
    [  243.684155][  T123]  #3: c000000035ff4cb8 (&dev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: napi_enable+0x30/0x60
    [  243.684166][  T123] 5 locks held by stress.sh/4366:
    [  243.684170][  T123]  #0: c00000003a4cd3f8 (sb_writers#3){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ksys_write+0x88/0x150
    [  243.684183][  T123]  #1: c00000000aee2288 (&of->mutex#2){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x154/0x2d0
    [  243.684194][  T123]  #2: c0000000366f4ba8 (kn->active#64){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x160/0x2d0
    [  243.684205][  T123]  #3: c000000035ff4cb8 (&dev->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: napi_disable+0x30/0x60
    [  243.684216][  T123]  #4: c0000003ff9bbf18 (&rq->__lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: __schedule+0x138/0x12a0

From the ibmveth debug, two threads are calling veth_pool_store, which
calls ibmveth_close and ibmveth_open. Here's the sequence:

  T4365             T4366
  ----------------- ----------------- ---------
  veth_pool_store   veth_pool_store
                    ibmveth_close
  ibmveth_close
  napi_disable
                    napi_disable
  ibmveth_open
  napi_enable                         <- HANG

ibmveth_close calls napi_disable at the top and ibmveth_open calls
napi_enable at the top.

https://docs.kernel.org/networking/napi.html]] says

  The control APIs are not idempotent. Control API calls are safe
  against concurrent use of datapath APIs but an incorrect sequence of
  control API calls may result in crashes, deadlocks, or race
  conditions. For example, calling napi_disable() multiple times in a
  row will deadlock.

In the normal open and close paths, rtnl_mutex is acquired to prevent
other callers. This is missing from veth_pool_store. Use rtnl_mutex in
veth_pool_store fixes these hangs.

Signed-off-by: Dave Marquardt <davemarq@linux.ibm.com>
Fixes: 860f242 ("[PATCH] ibmveth change buffer pools dynamically")
Reviewed-by: Nick Child <nnac123@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250402154403.386744-1-davemarq@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
kdave pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 14, 2025
Commit 7da55c2 ("drm/amd/display: Remove incorrect FP context
start") removes the FP context protection of dml2_create(), and it said
"All the DC_FP_START/END should be used before call anything from DML2".

However, dml2_validate()/dml21_validate() are not protected from their
callers, causing such errors:

 do_fpu invoked from kernel context![#1]:
 CPU: 10 UID: 0 PID: 331 Comm: kworker/10:1H Not tainted 6.14.0-rc6+ #4
 Workqueue: events_highpri dm_irq_work_func [amdgpu]
 pc ffff800003191eb0 ra ffff800003191e60 tp 9000000107a94000 sp 9000000107a975b0
 a0 9000000140ce4910 a1 0000000000000000 a2 9000000140ce49b0 a3 9000000140ce49a8
 a4 9000000140ce49a8 a5 0000000100000000 a6 0000000000000001 a7 9000000107a97660
 t0 ffff800003790000 t1 9000000140ce5000 t2 0000000000000001 t3 0000000000000000
 t4 0000000000000004 t5 0000000000000000 t6 0000000000000000 t7 0000000000000000
 t8 0000000100000000 u0 ffff8000031a3b9c s9 9000000130bc0000 s0 9000000132400000
 s1 9000000140ec0000 s2 9000000132400000 s3 9000000140ce0000 s4 90000000057f8b88
 s5 9000000140ec0000 s6 9000000140ce4910 s7 0000000000000001 s8 9000000130d45010
 ra: ffff800003191e60 dml21_map_dc_state_into_dml_display_cfg+0x40/0x1140 [amdgpu]
   ERA: ffff800003191eb0 dml21_map_dc_state_into_dml_display_cfg+0x90/0x1140 [amdgpu]
  CRMD: 000000b0 (PLV0 -IE -DA +PG DACF=CC DACM=CC -WE)
  PRMD: 00000004 (PPLV0 +PIE -PWE)
  EUEN: 00000000 (-FPE -SXE -ASXE -BTE)
  ECFG: 00071c1d (LIE=0,2-4,10-12 VS=7)
 ESTAT: 000f0000 [FPD] (IS= ECode=15 EsubCode=0)
  PRID: 0014d010 (Loongson-64bit, Loongson-3C6000/S)
 Process kworker/10:1H (pid: 331, threadinfo=000000007bf9ddb0, task=00000000cc4ab9f3)
 Stack : 0000000100000000 0000043800000780 0000000100000001 0000000100000001
         0000000000000000 0000078000000000 0000000000000438 0000078000000000
         0000000000000438 0000078000000000 0000000000000438 0000000100000000
         0000000100000000 0000000100000000 0000000100000000 0000000100000000
         0000000000000001 9000000140ec0000 9000000132400000 9000000132400000
         ffff800003408000 ffff800003408000 9000000132400000 9000000140ce0000
         9000000140ce0000 ffff800003193850 0000000000000001 9000000140ec0000
         9000000132400000 9000000140ec0860 9000000140ec0738 0000000000000001
         90000001405e8000 9000000130bc0000 9000000140ec02a8 ffff8000031b5db8
         0000000000000000 0000043800000780 0000000000000003 ffff8000031b79cc
         ...
 Call Trace:
 [<ffff800003191eb0>] dml21_map_dc_state_into_dml_display_cfg+0x90/0x1140 [amdgpu]
 [<ffff80000319384c>] dml21_validate+0xcc/0x520 [amdgpu]
 [<ffff8000031b8948>] dc_validate_global_state+0x2e8/0x460 [amdgpu]
 [<ffff800002e94034>] create_validate_stream_for_sink+0x3d4/0x420 [amdgpu]
 [<ffff800002e940e4>] amdgpu_dm_connector_mode_valid+0x64/0x240 [amdgpu]
 [<900000000441d6b8>] drm_connector_mode_valid+0x38/0x80
 [<900000000441d824>] __drm_helper_update_and_validate+0x124/0x3e0
 [<900000000441ddc0>] drm_helper_probe_single_connector_modes+0x2e0/0x620
 [<90000000044050dc>] drm_client_modeset_probe+0x23c/0x1780
 [<9000000004420384>] __drm_fb_helper_initial_config_and_unlock+0x44/0x5a0
 [<9000000004403acc>] drm_client_dev_hotplug+0xcc/0x140
 [<ffff800002e9ab50>] handle_hpd_irq_helper+0x1b0/0x1e0 [amdgpu]
 [<90000000038f5da0>] process_one_work+0x160/0x300
 [<90000000038f6718>] worker_thread+0x318/0x440
 [<9000000003901b8c>] kthread+0x12c/0x220
 [<90000000038b1484>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x8/0xa4

Unfortunately, protecting dml2_validate()/dml21_validate() out of DML2
causes "sleeping function called from invalid context", so protect them
with DC_FP_START() and DC_FP_END() inside.

Fixes: 7da55c2 ("drm/amd/display: Remove incorrect FP context start")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>
Tested-by: Dongyan Qian <qiandongyan@loongson.cn>
Reviewed-by: Aurabindo Pillai <aurabindo.pillai@amd.com>
Tested-by: Daniel Wheeler <daniel.wheeler@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
kdave pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 14, 2025
If we finds a vq without a name in our input array in
virtio_ccw_find_vqs(), we treat it as "non-existing" and set the vq pointer
to NULL; we will not call virtio_ccw_setup_vq() to allocate/setup a vq.

Consequently, we create only a queue if it actually exists (name != NULL)
and assign an incremental queue index to each such existing queue.

However, in virtio_ccw_register_adapter_ind()->get_airq_indicator() we
will not ignore these "non-existing queues", but instead assign an airq
indicator to them.

Besides never releasing them in virtio_ccw_drop_indicators() (because
there is no virtqueue), the bigger issue seems to be that there will be a
disagreement between the device and the Linux guest about the airq
indicator to be used for notifying a queue, because the indicator bit
for adapter I/O interrupt is derived from the queue index.

The virtio spec states under "Setting Up Two-Stage Queue Indicators":

	... indicator contains the guest address of an area wherein the
	indicators for the devices are contained, starting at bit_nr, one
	bit per virtqueue of the device.

And further in "Notification via Adapter I/O Interrupts":

	For notifying the driver of virtqueue buffers, the device sets the
	bit in the guest-provided indicator area at the corresponding
	offset.

For example, QEMU uses in virtio_ccw_notify() the queue index (passed as
"vector") to select the relevant indicator bit. If a queue does not exist,
it does not have a corresponding indicator bit assigned, because it
effectively doesn't have a queue index.

Using a virtio-balloon-ccw device under QEMU with free-page-hinting
disabled ("free-page-hint=off") but free-page-reporting enabled
("free-page-reporting=on") will result in free page reporting
not working as expected: in the virtio_balloon driver, we'll be stuck
forever in virtballoon_free_page_report()->wait_event(), because the
waitqueue will not be woken up as the notification from the device is
lost: it would use the wrong indicator bit.

Free page reporting stops working and we get splats (when configured to
detect hung wqs) like:

 INFO: task kworker/1:3:463 blocked for more than 61 seconds.
       Not tainted 6.14.0 #4
 "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
 task:kworker/1:3 [...]
 Workqueue: events page_reporting_process
 Call Trace:
  [<000002f404e6dfb2>] __schedule+0x402/0x1640
  [<000002f404e6f22e>] schedule+0x3e/0xe0
  [<000002f3846a88fa>] virtballoon_free_page_report+0xaa/0x110 [virtio_balloon]
  [<000002f40435c8a4>] page_reporting_process+0x2e4/0x740
  [<000002f403fd3ee2>] process_one_work+0x1c2/0x400
  [<000002f403fd4b96>] worker_thread+0x296/0x420
  [<000002f403fe10b4>] kthread+0x124/0x290
  [<000002f403f4e0dc>] __ret_from_fork+0x3c/0x60
  [<000002f404e77272>] ret_from_fork+0xa/0x38

There was recently a discussion [1] whether the "holes" should be
treated differently again, effectively assigning also non-existing
queues a queue index: that should also fix the issue, but requires other
workarounds to not break existing setups.

Let's fix it without affecting existing setups for now by properly ignoring
the non-existing queues, so the indicator bits will match the queue
indexes.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1720611677.git.mst@redhat.com/

Fixes: a229989 ("virtio: don't allocate vqs when names[i] = NULL")
Reported-by: Chandra Merla <cmerla@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250402203621.940090-1-david@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
kdave pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 14, 2025
There is a potential deadlock if we do report zones in an IO context, detailed
in below lockdep report. When one process do a report zones and another process
freezes the block device, the report zones side cannot allocate a tag because
the freeze is already started. This can thus result in new block group creation
to hang forever, blocking the write path.

Thankfully, a new block group should be created on empty zones. So, reporting
the zones is not necessary and we can set the write pointer = 0 and load the
zone capacity from the block layer using bdev_zone_capacity() helper.

 ======================================================
 WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
 6.14.0-rc1 torvalds#252 Not tainted
 ------------------------------------------------------
 modprobe/1110 is trying to acquire lock:
 ffff888100ac83e0 ((work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0x38f/0xb60

 but task is already holding lock:
 ffff8881205b6f20 (&q->q_usage_counter(queue)torvalds#16){++++}-{0:0}, at: sd_remove+0x85/0x130

 which lock already depends on the new lock.

 the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

 -> #3 (&q->q_usage_counter(queue)torvalds#16){++++}-{0:0}:
        blk_queue_enter+0x3d9/0x500
        blk_mq_alloc_request+0x47d/0x8e0
        scsi_execute_cmd+0x14f/0xb80
        sd_zbc_do_report_zones+0x1c1/0x470
        sd_zbc_report_zones+0x362/0xd60
        blkdev_report_zones+0x1b1/0x2e0
        btrfs_get_dev_zones+0x215/0x7e0 [btrfs]
        btrfs_load_block_group_zone_info+0x6d2/0x2c10 [btrfs]
        btrfs_make_block_group+0x36b/0x870 [btrfs]
        btrfs_create_chunk+0x147d/0x2320 [btrfs]
        btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x2ce/0xcf0 [btrfs]
        start_transaction+0xce6/0x1620 [btrfs]
        btrfs_uuid_scan_kthread+0x4ee/0x5b0 [btrfs]
        kthread+0x39d/0x750
        ret_from_fork+0x30/0x70
        ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30

 -> #2 (&fs_info->dev_replace.rwsem){++++}-{4:4}:
        down_read+0x9b/0x470
        btrfs_map_block+0x2ce/0x2ce0 [btrfs]
        btrfs_submit_chunk+0x2d4/0x16c0 [btrfs]
        btrfs_submit_bbio+0x16/0x30 [btrfs]
        btree_write_cache_pages+0xb5a/0xf90 [btrfs]
        do_writepages+0x17f/0x7b0
        __writeback_single_inode+0x114/0xb00
        writeback_sb_inodes+0x52b/0xe00
        wb_writeback+0x1a7/0x800
        wb_workfn+0x12a/0xbd0
        process_one_work+0x85a/0x1460
        worker_thread+0x5e2/0xfc0
        kthread+0x39d/0x750
        ret_from_fork+0x30/0x70
        ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30

 -> #1 (&fs_info->zoned_meta_io_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}:
        __mutex_lock+0x1aa/0x1360
        btree_write_cache_pages+0x252/0xf90 [btrfs]
        do_writepages+0x17f/0x7b0
        __writeback_single_inode+0x114/0xb00
        writeback_sb_inodes+0x52b/0xe00
        wb_writeback+0x1a7/0x800
        wb_workfn+0x12a/0xbd0
        process_one_work+0x85a/0x1460
        worker_thread+0x5e2/0xfc0
        kthread+0x39d/0x750
        ret_from_fork+0x30/0x70
        ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30

 -> #0 ((work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}:
        __lock_acquire+0x2f52/0x5ea0
        lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x540
        __flush_work+0x3ac/0xb60
        wb_shutdown+0x15b/0x1f0
        bdi_unregister+0x172/0x5b0
        del_gendisk+0x841/0xa20
        sd_remove+0x85/0x130
        device_release_driver_internal+0x368/0x520
        bus_remove_device+0x1f1/0x3f0
        device_del+0x3bd/0x9c0
        __scsi_remove_device+0x272/0x340
        scsi_forget_host+0xf7/0x170
        scsi_remove_host+0xd2/0x2a0
        sdebug_driver_remove+0x52/0x2f0 [scsi_debug]
        device_release_driver_internal+0x368/0x520
        bus_remove_device+0x1f1/0x3f0
        device_del+0x3bd/0x9c0
        device_unregister+0x13/0xa0
        sdebug_do_remove_host+0x1fb/0x290 [scsi_debug]
        scsi_debug_exit+0x17/0x70 [scsi_debug]
        __do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x321/0x520
        do_syscall_64+0x93/0x180
        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

 other info that might help us debug this:

 Chain exists of:
   (work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work) --> &fs_info->dev_replace.rwsem --> &q->q_usage_counter(queue)torvalds#16

  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

        CPU0                    CPU1
        ----                    ----
   lock(&q->q_usage_counter(queue)torvalds#16);
                                lock(&fs_info->dev_replace.rwsem);
                                lock(&q->q_usage_counter(queue)torvalds#16);
   lock((work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work));

  *** DEADLOCK ***

 5 locks held by modprobe/1110:
  #0: ffff88811f7bc108 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x8f/0x520
  #1: ffff8881022ee0e0 (&shost->scan_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: scsi_remove_host+0x20/0x2a0
  #2: ffff88811b4c4378 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x8f/0x520
  #3: ffff8881205b6f20 (&q->q_usage_counter(queue)torvalds#16){++++}-{0:0}, at: sd_remove+0x85/0x130
  #4: ffffffffa3284360 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: __flush_work+0xda/0xb60

 stack backtrace:
 CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 1110 Comm: modprobe Not tainted 6.14.0-rc1 torvalds#252
 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-3.fc41 04/01/2014
 Call Trace:
  <TASK>
  dump_stack_lvl+0x6a/0x90
  print_circular_bug.cold+0x1e0/0x274
  check_noncircular+0x306/0x3f0
  ? __pfx_check_noncircular+0x10/0x10
  ? mark_lock+0xf5/0x1650
  ? __pfx_check_irq_usage+0x10/0x10
  ? lockdep_lock+0xca/0x1c0
  ? __pfx_lockdep_lock+0x10/0x10
  __lock_acquire+0x2f52/0x5ea0
  ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx_mark_lock+0x10/0x10
  lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x540
  ? __flush_work+0x38f/0xb60
  ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx_lock_release+0x10/0x10
  ? mark_held_locks+0x94/0xe0
  ? __flush_work+0x38f/0xb60
  __flush_work+0x3ac/0xb60
  ? __flush_work+0x38f/0xb60
  ? __pfx_mark_lock+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx___flush_work+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx_wq_barrier_func+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx___might_resched+0x10/0x10
  ? mark_held_locks+0x94/0xe0
  wb_shutdown+0x15b/0x1f0
  bdi_unregister+0x172/0x5b0
  ? __pfx_bdi_unregister+0x10/0x10
  ? up_write+0x1ba/0x510
  del_gendisk+0x841/0xa20
  ? __pfx_del_gendisk+0x10/0x10
  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x35/0x60
  ? __pm_runtime_resume+0x79/0x110
  sd_remove+0x85/0x130
  device_release_driver_internal+0x368/0x520
  ? kobject_put+0x5d/0x4a0
  bus_remove_device+0x1f1/0x3f0
  device_del+0x3bd/0x9c0
  ? __pfx_device_del+0x10/0x10
  __scsi_remove_device+0x272/0x340
  scsi_forget_host+0xf7/0x170
  scsi_remove_host+0xd2/0x2a0
  sdebug_driver_remove+0x52/0x2f0 [scsi_debug]
  ? kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0xc0/0xf0
  device_release_driver_internal+0x368/0x520
  ? kobject_put+0x5d/0x4a0
  bus_remove_device+0x1f1/0x3f0
  device_del+0x3bd/0x9c0
  ? __pfx_device_del+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx___mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x10/0x10
  device_unregister+0x13/0xa0
  sdebug_do_remove_host+0x1fb/0x290 [scsi_debug]
  scsi_debug_exit+0x17/0x70 [scsi_debug]
  __do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x321/0x520
  ? __pfx___do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx_slab_free_after_rcu_debug+0x10/0x10
  ? kasan_save_stack+0x2c/0x50
  ? kasan_record_aux_stack+0xa3/0xb0
  ? __call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0xc4/0xfb0
  ? kmem_cache_free+0x3a0/0x590
  ? __x64_sys_close+0x78/0xd0
  do_syscall_64+0x93/0x180
  ? lock_is_held_type+0xd5/0x130
  ? __call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0x3c0/0xfb0
  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x78/0x100
  ? __call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0x3c0/0xfb0
  ? __pfx___call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0x10/0x10
  ? kmem_cache_free+0x3a0/0x590
  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x16d/0x400
  ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x78/0x100
  ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
  ? __pfx___x64_sys_openat+0x10/0x10
  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x16d/0x400
  ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x78/0x100
  ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
 RIP: 0033:0x7f436712b68b
 RSP: 002b:00007ffe9f1a8658 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000b0
 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00005559b367fd80 RCX: 00007f436712b68b
 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000800 RDI: 00005559b367fde8
 RBP: 00007ffe9f1a8680 R08: 1999999999999999 R09: 0000000000000000
 R10: 00007f43671a5fe0 R11: 0000000000000206 R12: 0000000000000000
 R13: 00007ffe9f1a86b0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
  </TASK>

Reported-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 6.13+
Tested-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
kdave pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 14, 2025
There is a potential deadlock if we do report zones in an IO context, detailed
in below lockdep report. When one process do a report zones and another process
freezes the block device, the report zones side cannot allocate a tag because
the freeze is already started. This can thus result in new block group creation
to hang forever, blocking the write path.

Thankfully, a new block group should be created on empty zones. So, reporting
the zones is not necessary and we can set the write pointer = 0 and load the
zone capacity from the block layer using bdev_zone_capacity() helper.

 ======================================================
 WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
 6.14.0-rc1 torvalds#252 Not tainted
 ------------------------------------------------------
 modprobe/1110 is trying to acquire lock:
 ffff888100ac83e0 ((work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0x38f/0xb60

 but task is already holding lock:
 ffff8881205b6f20 (&q->q_usage_counter(queue)torvalds#16){++++}-{0:0}, at: sd_remove+0x85/0x130

 which lock already depends on the new lock.

 the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

 -> #3 (&q->q_usage_counter(queue)torvalds#16){++++}-{0:0}:
        blk_queue_enter+0x3d9/0x500
        blk_mq_alloc_request+0x47d/0x8e0
        scsi_execute_cmd+0x14f/0xb80
        sd_zbc_do_report_zones+0x1c1/0x470
        sd_zbc_report_zones+0x362/0xd60
        blkdev_report_zones+0x1b1/0x2e0
        btrfs_get_dev_zones+0x215/0x7e0 [btrfs]
        btrfs_load_block_group_zone_info+0x6d2/0x2c10 [btrfs]
        btrfs_make_block_group+0x36b/0x870 [btrfs]
        btrfs_create_chunk+0x147d/0x2320 [btrfs]
        btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x2ce/0xcf0 [btrfs]
        start_transaction+0xce6/0x1620 [btrfs]
        btrfs_uuid_scan_kthread+0x4ee/0x5b0 [btrfs]
        kthread+0x39d/0x750
        ret_from_fork+0x30/0x70
        ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30

 -> #2 (&fs_info->dev_replace.rwsem){++++}-{4:4}:
        down_read+0x9b/0x470
        btrfs_map_block+0x2ce/0x2ce0 [btrfs]
        btrfs_submit_chunk+0x2d4/0x16c0 [btrfs]
        btrfs_submit_bbio+0x16/0x30 [btrfs]
        btree_write_cache_pages+0xb5a/0xf90 [btrfs]
        do_writepages+0x17f/0x7b0
        __writeback_single_inode+0x114/0xb00
        writeback_sb_inodes+0x52b/0xe00
        wb_writeback+0x1a7/0x800
        wb_workfn+0x12a/0xbd0
        process_one_work+0x85a/0x1460
        worker_thread+0x5e2/0xfc0
        kthread+0x39d/0x750
        ret_from_fork+0x30/0x70
        ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30

 -> #1 (&fs_info->zoned_meta_io_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}:
        __mutex_lock+0x1aa/0x1360
        btree_write_cache_pages+0x252/0xf90 [btrfs]
        do_writepages+0x17f/0x7b0
        __writeback_single_inode+0x114/0xb00
        writeback_sb_inodes+0x52b/0xe00
        wb_writeback+0x1a7/0x800
        wb_workfn+0x12a/0xbd0
        process_one_work+0x85a/0x1460
        worker_thread+0x5e2/0xfc0
        kthread+0x39d/0x750
        ret_from_fork+0x30/0x70
        ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30

 -> #0 ((work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}:
        __lock_acquire+0x2f52/0x5ea0
        lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x540
        __flush_work+0x3ac/0xb60
        wb_shutdown+0x15b/0x1f0
        bdi_unregister+0x172/0x5b0
        del_gendisk+0x841/0xa20
        sd_remove+0x85/0x130
        device_release_driver_internal+0x368/0x520
        bus_remove_device+0x1f1/0x3f0
        device_del+0x3bd/0x9c0
        __scsi_remove_device+0x272/0x340
        scsi_forget_host+0xf7/0x170
        scsi_remove_host+0xd2/0x2a0
        sdebug_driver_remove+0x52/0x2f0 [scsi_debug]
        device_release_driver_internal+0x368/0x520
        bus_remove_device+0x1f1/0x3f0
        device_del+0x3bd/0x9c0
        device_unregister+0x13/0xa0
        sdebug_do_remove_host+0x1fb/0x290 [scsi_debug]
        scsi_debug_exit+0x17/0x70 [scsi_debug]
        __do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x321/0x520
        do_syscall_64+0x93/0x180
        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

 other info that might help us debug this:

 Chain exists of:
   (work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work) --> &fs_info->dev_replace.rwsem --> &q->q_usage_counter(queue)torvalds#16

  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

        CPU0                    CPU1
        ----                    ----
   lock(&q->q_usage_counter(queue)torvalds#16);
                                lock(&fs_info->dev_replace.rwsem);
                                lock(&q->q_usage_counter(queue)torvalds#16);
   lock((work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work));

  *** DEADLOCK ***

 5 locks held by modprobe/1110:
  #0: ffff88811f7bc108 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x8f/0x520
  #1: ffff8881022ee0e0 (&shost->scan_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: scsi_remove_host+0x20/0x2a0
  #2: ffff88811b4c4378 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x8f/0x520
  #3: ffff8881205b6f20 (&q->q_usage_counter(queue)torvalds#16){++++}-{0:0}, at: sd_remove+0x85/0x130
  #4: ffffffffa3284360 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: __flush_work+0xda/0xb60

 stack backtrace:
 CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 1110 Comm: modprobe Not tainted 6.14.0-rc1 torvalds#252
 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-3.fc41 04/01/2014
 Call Trace:
  <TASK>
  dump_stack_lvl+0x6a/0x90
  print_circular_bug.cold+0x1e0/0x274
  check_noncircular+0x306/0x3f0
  ? __pfx_check_noncircular+0x10/0x10
  ? mark_lock+0xf5/0x1650
  ? __pfx_check_irq_usage+0x10/0x10
  ? lockdep_lock+0xca/0x1c0
  ? __pfx_lockdep_lock+0x10/0x10
  __lock_acquire+0x2f52/0x5ea0
  ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx_mark_lock+0x10/0x10
  lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x540
  ? __flush_work+0x38f/0xb60
  ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx_lock_release+0x10/0x10
  ? mark_held_locks+0x94/0xe0
  ? __flush_work+0x38f/0xb60
  __flush_work+0x3ac/0xb60
  ? __flush_work+0x38f/0xb60
  ? __pfx_mark_lock+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx___flush_work+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx_wq_barrier_func+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx___might_resched+0x10/0x10
  ? mark_held_locks+0x94/0xe0
  wb_shutdown+0x15b/0x1f0
  bdi_unregister+0x172/0x5b0
  ? __pfx_bdi_unregister+0x10/0x10
  ? up_write+0x1ba/0x510
  del_gendisk+0x841/0xa20
  ? __pfx_del_gendisk+0x10/0x10
  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x35/0x60
  ? __pm_runtime_resume+0x79/0x110
  sd_remove+0x85/0x130
  device_release_driver_internal+0x368/0x520
  ? kobject_put+0x5d/0x4a0
  bus_remove_device+0x1f1/0x3f0
  device_del+0x3bd/0x9c0
  ? __pfx_device_del+0x10/0x10
  __scsi_remove_device+0x272/0x340
  scsi_forget_host+0xf7/0x170
  scsi_remove_host+0xd2/0x2a0
  sdebug_driver_remove+0x52/0x2f0 [scsi_debug]
  ? kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0xc0/0xf0
  device_release_driver_internal+0x368/0x520
  ? kobject_put+0x5d/0x4a0
  bus_remove_device+0x1f1/0x3f0
  device_del+0x3bd/0x9c0
  ? __pfx_device_del+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx___mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x10/0x10
  device_unregister+0x13/0xa0
  sdebug_do_remove_host+0x1fb/0x290 [scsi_debug]
  scsi_debug_exit+0x17/0x70 [scsi_debug]
  __do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x321/0x520
  ? __pfx___do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx_slab_free_after_rcu_debug+0x10/0x10
  ? kasan_save_stack+0x2c/0x50
  ? kasan_record_aux_stack+0xa3/0xb0
  ? __call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0xc4/0xfb0
  ? kmem_cache_free+0x3a0/0x590
  ? __x64_sys_close+0x78/0xd0
  do_syscall_64+0x93/0x180
  ? lock_is_held_type+0xd5/0x130
  ? __call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0x3c0/0xfb0
  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x78/0x100
  ? __call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0x3c0/0xfb0
  ? __pfx___call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0x10/0x10
  ? kmem_cache_free+0x3a0/0x590
  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x16d/0x400
  ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x78/0x100
  ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
  ? __pfx___x64_sys_openat+0x10/0x10
  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x16d/0x400
  ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x78/0x100
  ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
 RIP: 0033:0x7f436712b68b
 RSP: 002b:00007ffe9f1a8658 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000b0
 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00005559b367fd80 RCX: 00007f436712b68b
 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000800 RDI: 00005559b367fde8
 RBP: 00007ffe9f1a8680 R08: 1999999999999999 R09: 0000000000000000
 R10: 00007f43671a5fe0 R11: 0000000000000206 R12: 0000000000000000
 R13: 00007ffe9f1a86b0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
  </TASK>

Reported-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 6.13+
Tested-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
kdave pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2025
There is a potential deadlock if we do report zones in an IO context, detailed
in below lockdep report. When one process do a report zones and another process
freezes the block device, the report zones side cannot allocate a tag because
the freeze is already started. This can thus result in new block group creation
to hang forever, blocking the write path.

Thankfully, a new block group should be created on empty zones. So, reporting
the zones is not necessary and we can set the write pointer = 0 and load the
zone capacity from the block layer using bdev_zone_capacity() helper.

 ======================================================
 WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
 6.14.0-rc1 torvalds#252 Not tainted
 ------------------------------------------------------
 modprobe/1110 is trying to acquire lock:
 ffff888100ac83e0 ((work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0x38f/0xb60

 but task is already holding lock:
 ffff8881205b6f20 (&q->q_usage_counter(queue)torvalds#16){++++}-{0:0}, at: sd_remove+0x85/0x130

 which lock already depends on the new lock.

 the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

 -> #3 (&q->q_usage_counter(queue)torvalds#16){++++}-{0:0}:
        blk_queue_enter+0x3d9/0x500
        blk_mq_alloc_request+0x47d/0x8e0
        scsi_execute_cmd+0x14f/0xb80
        sd_zbc_do_report_zones+0x1c1/0x470
        sd_zbc_report_zones+0x362/0xd60
        blkdev_report_zones+0x1b1/0x2e0
        btrfs_get_dev_zones+0x215/0x7e0 [btrfs]
        btrfs_load_block_group_zone_info+0x6d2/0x2c10 [btrfs]
        btrfs_make_block_group+0x36b/0x870 [btrfs]
        btrfs_create_chunk+0x147d/0x2320 [btrfs]
        btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x2ce/0xcf0 [btrfs]
        start_transaction+0xce6/0x1620 [btrfs]
        btrfs_uuid_scan_kthread+0x4ee/0x5b0 [btrfs]
        kthread+0x39d/0x750
        ret_from_fork+0x30/0x70
        ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30

 -> #2 (&fs_info->dev_replace.rwsem){++++}-{4:4}:
        down_read+0x9b/0x470
        btrfs_map_block+0x2ce/0x2ce0 [btrfs]
        btrfs_submit_chunk+0x2d4/0x16c0 [btrfs]
        btrfs_submit_bbio+0x16/0x30 [btrfs]
        btree_write_cache_pages+0xb5a/0xf90 [btrfs]
        do_writepages+0x17f/0x7b0
        __writeback_single_inode+0x114/0xb00
        writeback_sb_inodes+0x52b/0xe00
        wb_writeback+0x1a7/0x800
        wb_workfn+0x12a/0xbd0
        process_one_work+0x85a/0x1460
        worker_thread+0x5e2/0xfc0
        kthread+0x39d/0x750
        ret_from_fork+0x30/0x70
        ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30

 -> #1 (&fs_info->zoned_meta_io_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}:
        __mutex_lock+0x1aa/0x1360
        btree_write_cache_pages+0x252/0xf90 [btrfs]
        do_writepages+0x17f/0x7b0
        __writeback_single_inode+0x114/0xb00
        writeback_sb_inodes+0x52b/0xe00
        wb_writeback+0x1a7/0x800
        wb_workfn+0x12a/0xbd0
        process_one_work+0x85a/0x1460
        worker_thread+0x5e2/0xfc0
        kthread+0x39d/0x750
        ret_from_fork+0x30/0x70
        ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30

 -> #0 ((work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}:
        __lock_acquire+0x2f52/0x5ea0
        lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x540
        __flush_work+0x3ac/0xb60
        wb_shutdown+0x15b/0x1f0
        bdi_unregister+0x172/0x5b0
        del_gendisk+0x841/0xa20
        sd_remove+0x85/0x130
        device_release_driver_internal+0x368/0x520
        bus_remove_device+0x1f1/0x3f0
        device_del+0x3bd/0x9c0
        __scsi_remove_device+0x272/0x340
        scsi_forget_host+0xf7/0x170
        scsi_remove_host+0xd2/0x2a0
        sdebug_driver_remove+0x52/0x2f0 [scsi_debug]
        device_release_driver_internal+0x368/0x520
        bus_remove_device+0x1f1/0x3f0
        device_del+0x3bd/0x9c0
        device_unregister+0x13/0xa0
        sdebug_do_remove_host+0x1fb/0x290 [scsi_debug]
        scsi_debug_exit+0x17/0x70 [scsi_debug]
        __do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x321/0x520
        do_syscall_64+0x93/0x180
        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

 other info that might help us debug this:

 Chain exists of:
   (work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work) --> &fs_info->dev_replace.rwsem --> &q->q_usage_counter(queue)torvalds#16

  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

        CPU0                    CPU1
        ----                    ----
   lock(&q->q_usage_counter(queue)torvalds#16);
                                lock(&fs_info->dev_replace.rwsem);
                                lock(&q->q_usage_counter(queue)torvalds#16);
   lock((work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work));

  *** DEADLOCK ***

 5 locks held by modprobe/1110:
  #0: ffff88811f7bc108 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x8f/0x520
  #1: ffff8881022ee0e0 (&shost->scan_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: scsi_remove_host+0x20/0x2a0
  #2: ffff88811b4c4378 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x8f/0x520
  #3: ffff8881205b6f20 (&q->q_usage_counter(queue)torvalds#16){++++}-{0:0}, at: sd_remove+0x85/0x130
  #4: ffffffffa3284360 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: __flush_work+0xda/0xb60

 stack backtrace:
 CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 1110 Comm: modprobe Not tainted 6.14.0-rc1 torvalds#252
 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-3.fc41 04/01/2014
 Call Trace:
  <TASK>
  dump_stack_lvl+0x6a/0x90
  print_circular_bug.cold+0x1e0/0x274
  check_noncircular+0x306/0x3f0
  ? __pfx_check_noncircular+0x10/0x10
  ? mark_lock+0xf5/0x1650
  ? __pfx_check_irq_usage+0x10/0x10
  ? lockdep_lock+0xca/0x1c0
  ? __pfx_lockdep_lock+0x10/0x10
  __lock_acquire+0x2f52/0x5ea0
  ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx_mark_lock+0x10/0x10
  lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x540
  ? __flush_work+0x38f/0xb60
  ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx_lock_release+0x10/0x10
  ? mark_held_locks+0x94/0xe0
  ? __flush_work+0x38f/0xb60
  __flush_work+0x3ac/0xb60
  ? __flush_work+0x38f/0xb60
  ? __pfx_mark_lock+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx___flush_work+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx_wq_barrier_func+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx___might_resched+0x10/0x10
  ? mark_held_locks+0x94/0xe0
  wb_shutdown+0x15b/0x1f0
  bdi_unregister+0x172/0x5b0
  ? __pfx_bdi_unregister+0x10/0x10
  ? up_write+0x1ba/0x510
  del_gendisk+0x841/0xa20
  ? __pfx_del_gendisk+0x10/0x10
  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x35/0x60
  ? __pm_runtime_resume+0x79/0x110
  sd_remove+0x85/0x130
  device_release_driver_internal+0x368/0x520
  ? kobject_put+0x5d/0x4a0
  bus_remove_device+0x1f1/0x3f0
  device_del+0x3bd/0x9c0
  ? __pfx_device_del+0x10/0x10
  __scsi_remove_device+0x272/0x340
  scsi_forget_host+0xf7/0x170
  scsi_remove_host+0xd2/0x2a0
  sdebug_driver_remove+0x52/0x2f0 [scsi_debug]
  ? kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0xc0/0xf0
  device_release_driver_internal+0x368/0x520
  ? kobject_put+0x5d/0x4a0
  bus_remove_device+0x1f1/0x3f0
  device_del+0x3bd/0x9c0
  ? __pfx_device_del+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx___mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x10/0x10
  device_unregister+0x13/0xa0
  sdebug_do_remove_host+0x1fb/0x290 [scsi_debug]
  scsi_debug_exit+0x17/0x70 [scsi_debug]
  __do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x321/0x520
  ? __pfx___do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx_slab_free_after_rcu_debug+0x10/0x10
  ? kasan_save_stack+0x2c/0x50
  ? kasan_record_aux_stack+0xa3/0xb0
  ? __call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0xc4/0xfb0
  ? kmem_cache_free+0x3a0/0x590
  ? __x64_sys_close+0x78/0xd0
  do_syscall_64+0x93/0x180
  ? lock_is_held_type+0xd5/0x130
  ? __call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0x3c0/0xfb0
  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x78/0x100
  ? __call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0x3c0/0xfb0
  ? __pfx___call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0x10/0x10
  ? kmem_cache_free+0x3a0/0x590
  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x16d/0x400
  ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x78/0x100
  ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
  ? __pfx___x64_sys_openat+0x10/0x10
  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x16d/0x400
  ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x78/0x100
  ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
 RIP: 0033:0x7f436712b68b
 RSP: 002b:00007ffe9f1a8658 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000b0
 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00005559b367fd80 RCX: 00007f436712b68b
 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000800 RDI: 00005559b367fde8
 RBP: 00007ffe9f1a8680 R08: 1999999999999999 R09: 0000000000000000
 R10: 00007f43671a5fe0 R11: 0000000000000206 R12: 0000000000000000
 R13: 00007ffe9f1a86b0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
  </TASK>

Reported-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 6.13+
Tested-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
kdave pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2025
There is a potential deadlock if we do report zones in an IO context, detailed
in below lockdep report. When one process do a report zones and another process
freezes the block device, the report zones side cannot allocate a tag because
the freeze is already started. This can thus result in new block group creation
to hang forever, blocking the write path.

Thankfully, a new block group should be created on empty zones. So, reporting
the zones is not necessary and we can set the write pointer = 0 and load the
zone capacity from the block layer using bdev_zone_capacity() helper.

 ======================================================
 WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
 6.14.0-rc1 torvalds#252 Not tainted
 ------------------------------------------------------
 modprobe/1110 is trying to acquire lock:
 ffff888100ac83e0 ((work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0x38f/0xb60

 but task is already holding lock:
 ffff8881205b6f20 (&q->q_usage_counter(queue)torvalds#16){++++}-{0:0}, at: sd_remove+0x85/0x130

 which lock already depends on the new lock.

 the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

 -> #3 (&q->q_usage_counter(queue)torvalds#16){++++}-{0:0}:
        blk_queue_enter+0x3d9/0x500
        blk_mq_alloc_request+0x47d/0x8e0
        scsi_execute_cmd+0x14f/0xb80
        sd_zbc_do_report_zones+0x1c1/0x470
        sd_zbc_report_zones+0x362/0xd60
        blkdev_report_zones+0x1b1/0x2e0
        btrfs_get_dev_zones+0x215/0x7e0 [btrfs]
        btrfs_load_block_group_zone_info+0x6d2/0x2c10 [btrfs]
        btrfs_make_block_group+0x36b/0x870 [btrfs]
        btrfs_create_chunk+0x147d/0x2320 [btrfs]
        btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x2ce/0xcf0 [btrfs]
        start_transaction+0xce6/0x1620 [btrfs]
        btrfs_uuid_scan_kthread+0x4ee/0x5b0 [btrfs]
        kthread+0x39d/0x750
        ret_from_fork+0x30/0x70
        ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30

 -> #2 (&fs_info->dev_replace.rwsem){++++}-{4:4}:
        down_read+0x9b/0x470
        btrfs_map_block+0x2ce/0x2ce0 [btrfs]
        btrfs_submit_chunk+0x2d4/0x16c0 [btrfs]
        btrfs_submit_bbio+0x16/0x30 [btrfs]
        btree_write_cache_pages+0xb5a/0xf90 [btrfs]
        do_writepages+0x17f/0x7b0
        __writeback_single_inode+0x114/0xb00
        writeback_sb_inodes+0x52b/0xe00
        wb_writeback+0x1a7/0x800
        wb_workfn+0x12a/0xbd0
        process_one_work+0x85a/0x1460
        worker_thread+0x5e2/0xfc0
        kthread+0x39d/0x750
        ret_from_fork+0x30/0x70
        ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30

 -> #1 (&fs_info->zoned_meta_io_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}:
        __mutex_lock+0x1aa/0x1360
        btree_write_cache_pages+0x252/0xf90 [btrfs]
        do_writepages+0x17f/0x7b0
        __writeback_single_inode+0x114/0xb00
        writeback_sb_inodes+0x52b/0xe00
        wb_writeback+0x1a7/0x800
        wb_workfn+0x12a/0xbd0
        process_one_work+0x85a/0x1460
        worker_thread+0x5e2/0xfc0
        kthread+0x39d/0x750
        ret_from_fork+0x30/0x70
        ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30

 -> #0 ((work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}:
        __lock_acquire+0x2f52/0x5ea0
        lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x540
        __flush_work+0x3ac/0xb60
        wb_shutdown+0x15b/0x1f0
        bdi_unregister+0x172/0x5b0
        del_gendisk+0x841/0xa20
        sd_remove+0x85/0x130
        device_release_driver_internal+0x368/0x520
        bus_remove_device+0x1f1/0x3f0
        device_del+0x3bd/0x9c0
        __scsi_remove_device+0x272/0x340
        scsi_forget_host+0xf7/0x170
        scsi_remove_host+0xd2/0x2a0
        sdebug_driver_remove+0x52/0x2f0 [scsi_debug]
        device_release_driver_internal+0x368/0x520
        bus_remove_device+0x1f1/0x3f0
        device_del+0x3bd/0x9c0
        device_unregister+0x13/0xa0
        sdebug_do_remove_host+0x1fb/0x290 [scsi_debug]
        scsi_debug_exit+0x17/0x70 [scsi_debug]
        __do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x321/0x520
        do_syscall_64+0x93/0x180
        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

 other info that might help us debug this:

 Chain exists of:
   (work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work) --> &fs_info->dev_replace.rwsem --> &q->q_usage_counter(queue)torvalds#16

  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

        CPU0                    CPU1
        ----                    ----
   lock(&q->q_usage_counter(queue)torvalds#16);
                                lock(&fs_info->dev_replace.rwsem);
                                lock(&q->q_usage_counter(queue)torvalds#16);
   lock((work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work));

  *** DEADLOCK ***

 5 locks held by modprobe/1110:
  #0: ffff88811f7bc108 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x8f/0x520
  #1: ffff8881022ee0e0 (&shost->scan_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: scsi_remove_host+0x20/0x2a0
  #2: ffff88811b4c4378 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x8f/0x520
  #3: ffff8881205b6f20 (&q->q_usage_counter(queue)torvalds#16){++++}-{0:0}, at: sd_remove+0x85/0x130
  #4: ffffffffa3284360 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: __flush_work+0xda/0xb60

 stack backtrace:
 CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 1110 Comm: modprobe Not tainted 6.14.0-rc1 torvalds#252
 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-3.fc41 04/01/2014
 Call Trace:
  <TASK>
  dump_stack_lvl+0x6a/0x90
  print_circular_bug.cold+0x1e0/0x274
  check_noncircular+0x306/0x3f0
  ? __pfx_check_noncircular+0x10/0x10
  ? mark_lock+0xf5/0x1650
  ? __pfx_check_irq_usage+0x10/0x10
  ? lockdep_lock+0xca/0x1c0
  ? __pfx_lockdep_lock+0x10/0x10
  __lock_acquire+0x2f52/0x5ea0
  ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx_mark_lock+0x10/0x10
  lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x540
  ? __flush_work+0x38f/0xb60
  ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx_lock_release+0x10/0x10
  ? mark_held_locks+0x94/0xe0
  ? __flush_work+0x38f/0xb60
  __flush_work+0x3ac/0xb60
  ? __flush_work+0x38f/0xb60
  ? __pfx_mark_lock+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx___flush_work+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx_wq_barrier_func+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx___might_resched+0x10/0x10
  ? mark_held_locks+0x94/0xe0
  wb_shutdown+0x15b/0x1f0
  bdi_unregister+0x172/0x5b0
  ? __pfx_bdi_unregister+0x10/0x10
  ? up_write+0x1ba/0x510
  del_gendisk+0x841/0xa20
  ? __pfx_del_gendisk+0x10/0x10
  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x35/0x60
  ? __pm_runtime_resume+0x79/0x110
  sd_remove+0x85/0x130
  device_release_driver_internal+0x368/0x520
  ? kobject_put+0x5d/0x4a0
  bus_remove_device+0x1f1/0x3f0
  device_del+0x3bd/0x9c0
  ? __pfx_device_del+0x10/0x10
  __scsi_remove_device+0x272/0x340
  scsi_forget_host+0xf7/0x170
  scsi_remove_host+0xd2/0x2a0
  sdebug_driver_remove+0x52/0x2f0 [scsi_debug]
  ? kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0xc0/0xf0
  device_release_driver_internal+0x368/0x520
  ? kobject_put+0x5d/0x4a0
  bus_remove_device+0x1f1/0x3f0
  device_del+0x3bd/0x9c0
  ? __pfx_device_del+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx___mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x10/0x10
  device_unregister+0x13/0xa0
  sdebug_do_remove_host+0x1fb/0x290 [scsi_debug]
  scsi_debug_exit+0x17/0x70 [scsi_debug]
  __do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x321/0x520
  ? __pfx___do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx_slab_free_after_rcu_debug+0x10/0x10
  ? kasan_save_stack+0x2c/0x50
  ? kasan_record_aux_stack+0xa3/0xb0
  ? __call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0xc4/0xfb0
  ? kmem_cache_free+0x3a0/0x590
  ? __x64_sys_close+0x78/0xd0
  do_syscall_64+0x93/0x180
  ? lock_is_held_type+0xd5/0x130
  ? __call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0x3c0/0xfb0
  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x78/0x100
  ? __call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0x3c0/0xfb0
  ? __pfx___call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0x10/0x10
  ? kmem_cache_free+0x3a0/0x590
  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x16d/0x400
  ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x78/0x100
  ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
  ? __pfx___x64_sys_openat+0x10/0x10
  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x16d/0x400
  ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x78/0x100
  ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
 RIP: 0033:0x7f436712b68b
 RSP: 002b:00007ffe9f1a8658 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000b0
 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00005559b367fd80 RCX: 00007f436712b68b
 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000800 RDI: 00005559b367fde8
 RBP: 00007ffe9f1a8680 R08: 1999999999999999 R09: 0000000000000000
 R10: 00007f43671a5fe0 R11: 0000000000000206 R12: 0000000000000000
 R13: 00007ffe9f1a86b0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
  </TASK>

Reported-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 6.13+
Tested-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
kdave pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 17, 2025
There is a potential deadlock if we do report zones in an IO context, detailed
in below lockdep report. When one process do a report zones and another process
freezes the block device, the report zones side cannot allocate a tag because
the freeze is already started. This can thus result in new block group creation
to hang forever, blocking the write path.

Thankfully, a new block group should be created on empty zones. So, reporting
the zones is not necessary and we can set the write pointer = 0 and load the
zone capacity from the block layer using bdev_zone_capacity() helper.

 ======================================================
 WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
 6.14.0-rc1 torvalds#252 Not tainted
 ------------------------------------------------------
 modprobe/1110 is trying to acquire lock:
 ffff888100ac83e0 ((work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0x38f/0xb60

 but task is already holding lock:
 ffff8881205b6f20 (&q->q_usage_counter(queue)torvalds#16){++++}-{0:0}, at: sd_remove+0x85/0x130

 which lock already depends on the new lock.

 the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

 -> #3 (&q->q_usage_counter(queue)torvalds#16){++++}-{0:0}:
        blk_queue_enter+0x3d9/0x500
        blk_mq_alloc_request+0x47d/0x8e0
        scsi_execute_cmd+0x14f/0xb80
        sd_zbc_do_report_zones+0x1c1/0x470
        sd_zbc_report_zones+0x362/0xd60
        blkdev_report_zones+0x1b1/0x2e0
        btrfs_get_dev_zones+0x215/0x7e0 [btrfs]
        btrfs_load_block_group_zone_info+0x6d2/0x2c10 [btrfs]
        btrfs_make_block_group+0x36b/0x870 [btrfs]
        btrfs_create_chunk+0x147d/0x2320 [btrfs]
        btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x2ce/0xcf0 [btrfs]
        start_transaction+0xce6/0x1620 [btrfs]
        btrfs_uuid_scan_kthread+0x4ee/0x5b0 [btrfs]
        kthread+0x39d/0x750
        ret_from_fork+0x30/0x70
        ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30

 -> #2 (&fs_info->dev_replace.rwsem){++++}-{4:4}:
        down_read+0x9b/0x470
        btrfs_map_block+0x2ce/0x2ce0 [btrfs]
        btrfs_submit_chunk+0x2d4/0x16c0 [btrfs]
        btrfs_submit_bbio+0x16/0x30 [btrfs]
        btree_write_cache_pages+0xb5a/0xf90 [btrfs]
        do_writepages+0x17f/0x7b0
        __writeback_single_inode+0x114/0xb00
        writeback_sb_inodes+0x52b/0xe00
        wb_writeback+0x1a7/0x800
        wb_workfn+0x12a/0xbd0
        process_one_work+0x85a/0x1460
        worker_thread+0x5e2/0xfc0
        kthread+0x39d/0x750
        ret_from_fork+0x30/0x70
        ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30

 -> #1 (&fs_info->zoned_meta_io_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}:
        __mutex_lock+0x1aa/0x1360
        btree_write_cache_pages+0x252/0xf90 [btrfs]
        do_writepages+0x17f/0x7b0
        __writeback_single_inode+0x114/0xb00
        writeback_sb_inodes+0x52b/0xe00
        wb_writeback+0x1a7/0x800
        wb_workfn+0x12a/0xbd0
        process_one_work+0x85a/0x1460
        worker_thread+0x5e2/0xfc0
        kthread+0x39d/0x750
        ret_from_fork+0x30/0x70
        ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30

 -> #0 ((work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}:
        __lock_acquire+0x2f52/0x5ea0
        lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x540
        __flush_work+0x3ac/0xb60
        wb_shutdown+0x15b/0x1f0
        bdi_unregister+0x172/0x5b0
        del_gendisk+0x841/0xa20
        sd_remove+0x85/0x130
        device_release_driver_internal+0x368/0x520
        bus_remove_device+0x1f1/0x3f0
        device_del+0x3bd/0x9c0
        __scsi_remove_device+0x272/0x340
        scsi_forget_host+0xf7/0x170
        scsi_remove_host+0xd2/0x2a0
        sdebug_driver_remove+0x52/0x2f0 [scsi_debug]
        device_release_driver_internal+0x368/0x520
        bus_remove_device+0x1f1/0x3f0
        device_del+0x3bd/0x9c0
        device_unregister+0x13/0xa0
        sdebug_do_remove_host+0x1fb/0x290 [scsi_debug]
        scsi_debug_exit+0x17/0x70 [scsi_debug]
        __do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x321/0x520
        do_syscall_64+0x93/0x180
        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

 other info that might help us debug this:

 Chain exists of:
   (work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work) --> &fs_info->dev_replace.rwsem --> &q->q_usage_counter(queue)torvalds#16

  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

        CPU0                    CPU1
        ----                    ----
   lock(&q->q_usage_counter(queue)torvalds#16);
                                lock(&fs_info->dev_replace.rwsem);
                                lock(&q->q_usage_counter(queue)torvalds#16);
   lock((work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work));

  *** DEADLOCK ***

 5 locks held by modprobe/1110:
  #0: ffff88811f7bc108 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x8f/0x520
  #1: ffff8881022ee0e0 (&shost->scan_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: scsi_remove_host+0x20/0x2a0
  #2: ffff88811b4c4378 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x8f/0x520
  #3: ffff8881205b6f20 (&q->q_usage_counter(queue)torvalds#16){++++}-{0:0}, at: sd_remove+0x85/0x130
  #4: ffffffffa3284360 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: __flush_work+0xda/0xb60

 stack backtrace:
 CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 1110 Comm: modprobe Not tainted 6.14.0-rc1 torvalds#252
 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-3.fc41 04/01/2014
 Call Trace:
  <TASK>
  dump_stack_lvl+0x6a/0x90
  print_circular_bug.cold+0x1e0/0x274
  check_noncircular+0x306/0x3f0
  ? __pfx_check_noncircular+0x10/0x10
  ? mark_lock+0xf5/0x1650
  ? __pfx_check_irq_usage+0x10/0x10
  ? lockdep_lock+0xca/0x1c0
  ? __pfx_lockdep_lock+0x10/0x10
  __lock_acquire+0x2f52/0x5ea0
  ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx_mark_lock+0x10/0x10
  lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x540
  ? __flush_work+0x38f/0xb60
  ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx_lock_release+0x10/0x10
  ? mark_held_locks+0x94/0xe0
  ? __flush_work+0x38f/0xb60
  __flush_work+0x3ac/0xb60
  ? __flush_work+0x38f/0xb60
  ? __pfx_mark_lock+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx___flush_work+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx_wq_barrier_func+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx___might_resched+0x10/0x10
  ? mark_held_locks+0x94/0xe0
  wb_shutdown+0x15b/0x1f0
  bdi_unregister+0x172/0x5b0
  ? __pfx_bdi_unregister+0x10/0x10
  ? up_write+0x1ba/0x510
  del_gendisk+0x841/0xa20
  ? __pfx_del_gendisk+0x10/0x10
  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x35/0x60
  ? __pm_runtime_resume+0x79/0x110
  sd_remove+0x85/0x130
  device_release_driver_internal+0x368/0x520
  ? kobject_put+0x5d/0x4a0
  bus_remove_device+0x1f1/0x3f0
  device_del+0x3bd/0x9c0
  ? __pfx_device_del+0x10/0x10
  __scsi_remove_device+0x272/0x340
  scsi_forget_host+0xf7/0x170
  scsi_remove_host+0xd2/0x2a0
  sdebug_driver_remove+0x52/0x2f0 [scsi_debug]
  ? kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0xc0/0xf0
  device_release_driver_internal+0x368/0x520
  ? kobject_put+0x5d/0x4a0
  bus_remove_device+0x1f1/0x3f0
  device_del+0x3bd/0x9c0
  ? __pfx_device_del+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx___mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x10/0x10
  device_unregister+0x13/0xa0
  sdebug_do_remove_host+0x1fb/0x290 [scsi_debug]
  scsi_debug_exit+0x17/0x70 [scsi_debug]
  __do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x321/0x520
  ? __pfx___do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx_slab_free_after_rcu_debug+0x10/0x10
  ? kasan_save_stack+0x2c/0x50
  ? kasan_record_aux_stack+0xa3/0xb0
  ? __call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0xc4/0xfb0
  ? kmem_cache_free+0x3a0/0x590
  ? __x64_sys_close+0x78/0xd0
  do_syscall_64+0x93/0x180
  ? lock_is_held_type+0xd5/0x130
  ? __call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0x3c0/0xfb0
  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x78/0x100
  ? __call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0x3c0/0xfb0
  ? __pfx___call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0x10/0x10
  ? kmem_cache_free+0x3a0/0x590
  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x16d/0x400
  ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x78/0x100
  ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
  ? __pfx___x64_sys_openat+0x10/0x10
  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x16d/0x400
  ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x78/0x100
  ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
 RIP: 0033:0x7f436712b68b
 RSP: 002b:00007ffe9f1a8658 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000b0
 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00005559b367fd80 RCX: 00007f436712b68b
 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000800 RDI: 00005559b367fde8
 RBP: 00007ffe9f1a8680 R08: 1999999999999999 R09: 0000000000000000
 R10: 00007f43671a5fe0 R11: 0000000000000206 R12: 0000000000000000
 R13: 00007ffe9f1a86b0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
  </TASK>

Reported-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 6.13+
Tested-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
kdave pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2025
There is a potential deadlock if we do report zones in an IO context, detailed
in below lockdep report. When one process do a report zones and another process
freezes the block device, the report zones side cannot allocate a tag because
the freeze is already started. This can thus result in new block group creation
to hang forever, blocking the write path.

Thankfully, a new block group should be created on empty zones. So, reporting
the zones is not necessary and we can set the write pointer = 0 and load the
zone capacity from the block layer using bdev_zone_capacity() helper.

 ======================================================
 WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
 6.14.0-rc1 torvalds#252 Not tainted
 ------------------------------------------------------
 modprobe/1110 is trying to acquire lock:
 ffff888100ac83e0 ((work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0x38f/0xb60

 but task is already holding lock:
 ffff8881205b6f20 (&q->q_usage_counter(queue)torvalds#16){++++}-{0:0}, at: sd_remove+0x85/0x130

 which lock already depends on the new lock.

 the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

 -> #3 (&q->q_usage_counter(queue)torvalds#16){++++}-{0:0}:
        blk_queue_enter+0x3d9/0x500
        blk_mq_alloc_request+0x47d/0x8e0
        scsi_execute_cmd+0x14f/0xb80
        sd_zbc_do_report_zones+0x1c1/0x470
        sd_zbc_report_zones+0x362/0xd60
        blkdev_report_zones+0x1b1/0x2e0
        btrfs_get_dev_zones+0x215/0x7e0 [btrfs]
        btrfs_load_block_group_zone_info+0x6d2/0x2c10 [btrfs]
        btrfs_make_block_group+0x36b/0x870 [btrfs]
        btrfs_create_chunk+0x147d/0x2320 [btrfs]
        btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x2ce/0xcf0 [btrfs]
        start_transaction+0xce6/0x1620 [btrfs]
        btrfs_uuid_scan_kthread+0x4ee/0x5b0 [btrfs]
        kthread+0x39d/0x750
        ret_from_fork+0x30/0x70
        ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30

 -> #2 (&fs_info->dev_replace.rwsem){++++}-{4:4}:
        down_read+0x9b/0x470
        btrfs_map_block+0x2ce/0x2ce0 [btrfs]
        btrfs_submit_chunk+0x2d4/0x16c0 [btrfs]
        btrfs_submit_bbio+0x16/0x30 [btrfs]
        btree_write_cache_pages+0xb5a/0xf90 [btrfs]
        do_writepages+0x17f/0x7b0
        __writeback_single_inode+0x114/0xb00
        writeback_sb_inodes+0x52b/0xe00
        wb_writeback+0x1a7/0x800
        wb_workfn+0x12a/0xbd0
        process_one_work+0x85a/0x1460
        worker_thread+0x5e2/0xfc0
        kthread+0x39d/0x750
        ret_from_fork+0x30/0x70
        ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30

 -> #1 (&fs_info->zoned_meta_io_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}:
        __mutex_lock+0x1aa/0x1360
        btree_write_cache_pages+0x252/0xf90 [btrfs]
        do_writepages+0x17f/0x7b0
        __writeback_single_inode+0x114/0xb00
        writeback_sb_inodes+0x52b/0xe00
        wb_writeback+0x1a7/0x800
        wb_workfn+0x12a/0xbd0
        process_one_work+0x85a/0x1460
        worker_thread+0x5e2/0xfc0
        kthread+0x39d/0x750
        ret_from_fork+0x30/0x70
        ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30

 -> #0 ((work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}:
        __lock_acquire+0x2f52/0x5ea0
        lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x540
        __flush_work+0x3ac/0xb60
        wb_shutdown+0x15b/0x1f0
        bdi_unregister+0x172/0x5b0
        del_gendisk+0x841/0xa20
        sd_remove+0x85/0x130
        device_release_driver_internal+0x368/0x520
        bus_remove_device+0x1f1/0x3f0
        device_del+0x3bd/0x9c0
        __scsi_remove_device+0x272/0x340
        scsi_forget_host+0xf7/0x170
        scsi_remove_host+0xd2/0x2a0
        sdebug_driver_remove+0x52/0x2f0 [scsi_debug]
        device_release_driver_internal+0x368/0x520
        bus_remove_device+0x1f1/0x3f0
        device_del+0x3bd/0x9c0
        device_unregister+0x13/0xa0
        sdebug_do_remove_host+0x1fb/0x290 [scsi_debug]
        scsi_debug_exit+0x17/0x70 [scsi_debug]
        __do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x321/0x520
        do_syscall_64+0x93/0x180
        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

 other info that might help us debug this:

 Chain exists of:
   (work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work) --> &fs_info->dev_replace.rwsem --> &q->q_usage_counter(queue)torvalds#16

  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

        CPU0                    CPU1
        ----                    ----
   lock(&q->q_usage_counter(queue)torvalds#16);
                                lock(&fs_info->dev_replace.rwsem);
                                lock(&q->q_usage_counter(queue)torvalds#16);
   lock((work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work));

  *** DEADLOCK ***

 5 locks held by modprobe/1110:
  #0: ffff88811f7bc108 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x8f/0x520
  #1: ffff8881022ee0e0 (&shost->scan_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: scsi_remove_host+0x20/0x2a0
  #2: ffff88811b4c4378 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x8f/0x520
  #3: ffff8881205b6f20 (&q->q_usage_counter(queue)torvalds#16){++++}-{0:0}, at: sd_remove+0x85/0x130
  #4: ffffffffa3284360 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: __flush_work+0xda/0xb60

 stack backtrace:
 CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 1110 Comm: modprobe Not tainted 6.14.0-rc1 torvalds#252
 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-3.fc41 04/01/2014
 Call Trace:
  <TASK>
  dump_stack_lvl+0x6a/0x90
  print_circular_bug.cold+0x1e0/0x274
  check_noncircular+0x306/0x3f0
  ? __pfx_check_noncircular+0x10/0x10
  ? mark_lock+0xf5/0x1650
  ? __pfx_check_irq_usage+0x10/0x10
  ? lockdep_lock+0xca/0x1c0
  ? __pfx_lockdep_lock+0x10/0x10
  __lock_acquire+0x2f52/0x5ea0
  ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx_mark_lock+0x10/0x10
  lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x540
  ? __flush_work+0x38f/0xb60
  ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx_lock_release+0x10/0x10
  ? mark_held_locks+0x94/0xe0
  ? __flush_work+0x38f/0xb60
  __flush_work+0x3ac/0xb60
  ? __flush_work+0x38f/0xb60
  ? __pfx_mark_lock+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx___flush_work+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx_wq_barrier_func+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx___might_resched+0x10/0x10
  ? mark_held_locks+0x94/0xe0
  wb_shutdown+0x15b/0x1f0
  bdi_unregister+0x172/0x5b0
  ? __pfx_bdi_unregister+0x10/0x10
  ? up_write+0x1ba/0x510
  del_gendisk+0x841/0xa20
  ? __pfx_del_gendisk+0x10/0x10
  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x35/0x60
  ? __pm_runtime_resume+0x79/0x110
  sd_remove+0x85/0x130
  device_release_driver_internal+0x368/0x520
  ? kobject_put+0x5d/0x4a0
  bus_remove_device+0x1f1/0x3f0
  device_del+0x3bd/0x9c0
  ? __pfx_device_del+0x10/0x10
  __scsi_remove_device+0x272/0x340
  scsi_forget_host+0xf7/0x170
  scsi_remove_host+0xd2/0x2a0
  sdebug_driver_remove+0x52/0x2f0 [scsi_debug]
  ? kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0xc0/0xf0
  device_release_driver_internal+0x368/0x520
  ? kobject_put+0x5d/0x4a0
  bus_remove_device+0x1f1/0x3f0
  device_del+0x3bd/0x9c0
  ? __pfx_device_del+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx___mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x10/0x10
  device_unregister+0x13/0xa0
  sdebug_do_remove_host+0x1fb/0x290 [scsi_debug]
  scsi_debug_exit+0x17/0x70 [scsi_debug]
  __do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x321/0x520
  ? __pfx___do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx_slab_free_after_rcu_debug+0x10/0x10
  ? kasan_save_stack+0x2c/0x50
  ? kasan_record_aux_stack+0xa3/0xb0
  ? __call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0xc4/0xfb0
  ? kmem_cache_free+0x3a0/0x590
  ? __x64_sys_close+0x78/0xd0
  do_syscall_64+0x93/0x180
  ? lock_is_held_type+0xd5/0x130
  ? __call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0x3c0/0xfb0
  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x78/0x100
  ? __call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0x3c0/0xfb0
  ? __pfx___call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0x10/0x10
  ? kmem_cache_free+0x3a0/0x590
  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x16d/0x400
  ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x78/0x100
  ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
  ? __pfx___x64_sys_openat+0x10/0x10
  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x16d/0x400
  ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x78/0x100
  ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
 RIP: 0033:0x7f436712b68b
 RSP: 002b:00007ffe9f1a8658 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000b0
 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00005559b367fd80 RCX: 00007f436712b68b
 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000800 RDI: 00005559b367fde8
 RBP: 00007ffe9f1a8680 R08: 1999999999999999 R09: 0000000000000000
 R10: 00007f43671a5fe0 R11: 0000000000000206 R12: 0000000000000000
 R13: 00007ffe9f1a86b0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
  </TASK>

Reported-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 6.13+
Tested-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
kdave pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 23, 2025
There is a potential deadlock if we do report zones in an IO context, detailed
in below lockdep report. When one process do a report zones and another process
freezes the block device, the report zones side cannot allocate a tag because
the freeze is already started. This can thus result in new block group creation
to hang forever, blocking the write path.

Thankfully, a new block group should be created on empty zones. So, reporting
the zones is not necessary and we can set the write pointer = 0 and load the
zone capacity from the block layer using bdev_zone_capacity() helper.

 ======================================================
 WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
 6.14.0-rc1 torvalds#252 Not tainted
 ------------------------------------------------------
 modprobe/1110 is trying to acquire lock:
 ffff888100ac83e0 ((work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: __flush_work+0x38f/0xb60

 but task is already holding lock:
 ffff8881205b6f20 (&q->q_usage_counter(queue)torvalds#16){++++}-{0:0}, at: sd_remove+0x85/0x130

 which lock already depends on the new lock.

 the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

 -> #3 (&q->q_usage_counter(queue)torvalds#16){++++}-{0:0}:
        blk_queue_enter+0x3d9/0x500
        blk_mq_alloc_request+0x47d/0x8e0
        scsi_execute_cmd+0x14f/0xb80
        sd_zbc_do_report_zones+0x1c1/0x470
        sd_zbc_report_zones+0x362/0xd60
        blkdev_report_zones+0x1b1/0x2e0
        btrfs_get_dev_zones+0x215/0x7e0 [btrfs]
        btrfs_load_block_group_zone_info+0x6d2/0x2c10 [btrfs]
        btrfs_make_block_group+0x36b/0x870 [btrfs]
        btrfs_create_chunk+0x147d/0x2320 [btrfs]
        btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x2ce/0xcf0 [btrfs]
        start_transaction+0xce6/0x1620 [btrfs]
        btrfs_uuid_scan_kthread+0x4ee/0x5b0 [btrfs]
        kthread+0x39d/0x750
        ret_from_fork+0x30/0x70
        ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30

 -> #2 (&fs_info->dev_replace.rwsem){++++}-{4:4}:
        down_read+0x9b/0x470
        btrfs_map_block+0x2ce/0x2ce0 [btrfs]
        btrfs_submit_chunk+0x2d4/0x16c0 [btrfs]
        btrfs_submit_bbio+0x16/0x30 [btrfs]
        btree_write_cache_pages+0xb5a/0xf90 [btrfs]
        do_writepages+0x17f/0x7b0
        __writeback_single_inode+0x114/0xb00
        writeback_sb_inodes+0x52b/0xe00
        wb_writeback+0x1a7/0x800
        wb_workfn+0x12a/0xbd0
        process_one_work+0x85a/0x1460
        worker_thread+0x5e2/0xfc0
        kthread+0x39d/0x750
        ret_from_fork+0x30/0x70
        ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30

 -> #1 (&fs_info->zoned_meta_io_lock){+.+.}-{4:4}:
        __mutex_lock+0x1aa/0x1360
        btree_write_cache_pages+0x252/0xf90 [btrfs]
        do_writepages+0x17f/0x7b0
        __writeback_single_inode+0x114/0xb00
        writeback_sb_inodes+0x52b/0xe00
        wb_writeback+0x1a7/0x800
        wb_workfn+0x12a/0xbd0
        process_one_work+0x85a/0x1460
        worker_thread+0x5e2/0xfc0
        kthread+0x39d/0x750
        ret_from_fork+0x30/0x70
        ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30

 -> #0 ((work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work)){+.+.}-{0:0}:
        __lock_acquire+0x2f52/0x5ea0
        lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x540
        __flush_work+0x3ac/0xb60
        wb_shutdown+0x15b/0x1f0
        bdi_unregister+0x172/0x5b0
        del_gendisk+0x841/0xa20
        sd_remove+0x85/0x130
        device_release_driver_internal+0x368/0x520
        bus_remove_device+0x1f1/0x3f0
        device_del+0x3bd/0x9c0
        __scsi_remove_device+0x272/0x340
        scsi_forget_host+0xf7/0x170
        scsi_remove_host+0xd2/0x2a0
        sdebug_driver_remove+0x52/0x2f0 [scsi_debug]
        device_release_driver_internal+0x368/0x520
        bus_remove_device+0x1f1/0x3f0
        device_del+0x3bd/0x9c0
        device_unregister+0x13/0xa0
        sdebug_do_remove_host+0x1fb/0x290 [scsi_debug]
        scsi_debug_exit+0x17/0x70 [scsi_debug]
        __do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x321/0x520
        do_syscall_64+0x93/0x180
        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

 other info that might help us debug this:

 Chain exists of:
   (work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work) --> &fs_info->dev_replace.rwsem --> &q->q_usage_counter(queue)torvalds#16

  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

        CPU0                    CPU1
        ----                    ----
   lock(&q->q_usage_counter(queue)torvalds#16);
                                lock(&fs_info->dev_replace.rwsem);
                                lock(&q->q_usage_counter(queue)torvalds#16);
   lock((work_completion)(&(&wb->dwork)->work));

  *** DEADLOCK ***

 5 locks held by modprobe/1110:
  #0: ffff88811f7bc108 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x8f/0x520
  #1: ffff8881022ee0e0 (&shost->scan_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: scsi_remove_host+0x20/0x2a0
  #2: ffff88811b4c4378 (&dev->mutex){....}-{4:4}, at: device_release_driver_internal+0x8f/0x520
  #3: ffff8881205b6f20 (&q->q_usage_counter(queue)torvalds#16){++++}-{0:0}, at: sd_remove+0x85/0x130
  #4: ffffffffa3284360 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: __flush_work+0xda/0xb60

 stack backtrace:
 CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 1110 Comm: modprobe Not tainted 6.14.0-rc1 torvalds#252
 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-3.fc41 04/01/2014
 Call Trace:
  <TASK>
  dump_stack_lvl+0x6a/0x90
  print_circular_bug.cold+0x1e0/0x274
  check_noncircular+0x306/0x3f0
  ? __pfx_check_noncircular+0x10/0x10
  ? mark_lock+0xf5/0x1650
  ? __pfx_check_irq_usage+0x10/0x10
  ? lockdep_lock+0xca/0x1c0
  ? __pfx_lockdep_lock+0x10/0x10
  __lock_acquire+0x2f52/0x5ea0
  ? __pfx___lock_acquire+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx_mark_lock+0x10/0x10
  lock_acquire+0x1b1/0x540
  ? __flush_work+0x38f/0xb60
  ? __pfx_lock_acquire+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx_lock_release+0x10/0x10
  ? mark_held_locks+0x94/0xe0
  ? __flush_work+0x38f/0xb60
  __flush_work+0x3ac/0xb60
  ? __flush_work+0x38f/0xb60
  ? __pfx_mark_lock+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx___flush_work+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx_wq_barrier_func+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx___might_resched+0x10/0x10
  ? mark_held_locks+0x94/0xe0
  wb_shutdown+0x15b/0x1f0
  bdi_unregister+0x172/0x5b0
  ? __pfx_bdi_unregister+0x10/0x10
  ? up_write+0x1ba/0x510
  del_gendisk+0x841/0xa20
  ? __pfx_del_gendisk+0x10/0x10
  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x35/0x60
  ? __pm_runtime_resume+0x79/0x110
  sd_remove+0x85/0x130
  device_release_driver_internal+0x368/0x520
  ? kobject_put+0x5d/0x4a0
  bus_remove_device+0x1f1/0x3f0
  device_del+0x3bd/0x9c0
  ? __pfx_device_del+0x10/0x10
  __scsi_remove_device+0x272/0x340
  scsi_forget_host+0xf7/0x170
  scsi_remove_host+0xd2/0x2a0
  sdebug_driver_remove+0x52/0x2f0 [scsi_debug]
  ? kernfs_remove_by_name_ns+0xc0/0xf0
  device_release_driver_internal+0x368/0x520
  ? kobject_put+0x5d/0x4a0
  bus_remove_device+0x1f1/0x3f0
  device_del+0x3bd/0x9c0
  ? __pfx_device_del+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx___mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x10/0x10
  device_unregister+0x13/0xa0
  sdebug_do_remove_host+0x1fb/0x290 [scsi_debug]
  scsi_debug_exit+0x17/0x70 [scsi_debug]
  __do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x321/0x520
  ? __pfx___do_sys_delete_module.isra.0+0x10/0x10
  ? __pfx_slab_free_after_rcu_debug+0x10/0x10
  ? kasan_save_stack+0x2c/0x50
  ? kasan_record_aux_stack+0xa3/0xb0
  ? __call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0xc4/0xfb0
  ? kmem_cache_free+0x3a0/0x590
  ? __x64_sys_close+0x78/0xd0
  do_syscall_64+0x93/0x180
  ? lock_is_held_type+0xd5/0x130
  ? __call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0x3c0/0xfb0
  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x78/0x100
  ? __call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0x3c0/0xfb0
  ? __pfx___call_rcu_common.constprop.0+0x10/0x10
  ? kmem_cache_free+0x3a0/0x590
  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x16d/0x400
  ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x78/0x100
  ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
  ? __pfx___x64_sys_openat+0x10/0x10
  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x16d/0x400
  ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
  ? lockdep_hardirqs_on+0x78/0x100
  ? do_syscall_64+0x9f/0x180
  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e
 RIP: 0033:0x7f436712b68b
 RSP: 002b:00007ffe9f1a8658 EFLAGS: 00000206 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000b0
 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00005559b367fd80 RCX: 00007f436712b68b
 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000800 RDI: 00005559b367fde8
 RBP: 00007ffe9f1a8680 R08: 1999999999999999 R09: 0000000000000000
 R10: 00007f43671a5fe0 R11: 0000000000000206 R12: 0000000000000000
 R13: 00007ffe9f1a86b0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
  </TASK>

Reported-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
CC: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 6.13+
Tested-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants