Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on May 12, 2021. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@lifupan
Copy link
Member

@lifupan lifupan commented Apr 8, 2019

There is no need to send another SIGKILL signal following
SIGTERM signal, otherwise, sending the SIGKILL signal would
get failed since the container process would has been terminated
by the previous SIGTERM signal.

Fixes:#1493

Signed-off-by: lifupan lifupan@gmail.com

@lifupan lifupan force-pushed the fixstop branch 2 times, most recently from 04042bf to ce1432d Compare April 8, 2019 11:21
@lifupan
Copy link
Member Author

lifupan commented Apr 8, 2019

/test

@devimc
Copy link

devimc commented Apr 8, 2019

dnm - waiting for kata-containers/agent#526

@lifupan
Copy link
Member Author

lifupan commented Apr 10, 2019

/test

There is no need to send another SIGKILL signal following
SIGTERM signal, otherwise, sending the SIGKILL signal would
get failed since the container process would has been terminated
by the previous SIGTERM signal.

Fixes:kata-containers#1493

Signed-off-by: lifupan <lifupan@gmail.com>
@lifupan
Copy link
Member Author

lifupan commented Apr 11, 2019

/test

@devimc devimc merged commit c08976e into kata-containers:master Apr 11, 2019
@egernst egernst mentioned this pull request Apr 16, 2019
ganeshmaharaj pushed a commit to ganeshmaharaj/kata-runtime that referenced this pull request Apr 16, 2019
shimv2: fix the issue of stop container failed
(cherry picked from commit c08976e)

Fixes:kata-containers#1493

Signed-off-by: Ganesh Maharaj Mahalingam <ganesh.mahalingam@intel.com>
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

shimv2 testcase always failed after libcontainer updated to latest

4 participants