You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Since this project is a common utils, and used by many other open source projects as a vendor dependency, LGPLv3 with static-linking exception may be controversial in some situation for Go language libraries.
Many open source libraries in Go in licensed in MIT/BSD/Apache, so is it possible to change the license for the project to more permissive license (e.g. MIT/BSD/Apache) or dual license (e.g. LGPL + MIT) ?
Since this project is a common utils, and used by many other open source projects as a vendor dependency, LGPLv3 with static-linking exception may be controversial in some situation for Go language libraries.
Many open source libraries in Go in licensed in MIT/BSD/Apache, so is it possible to change the license for the project to more permissive license (e.g. MIT/BSD/Apache) or dual license (e.g. LGPL + MIT) ?
I found similar discuss in davidmoreno/onion#56
@kingsamchen
@nammn
Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: