Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: update link in article "Jest joins OpenJS Foundation" #12870

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 24, 2022

Conversation

Dennis273
Copy link
Contributor

Original link has "intern" in it, so it's not available for external users.

Summary

fix invalid link for "Meta Engineering blog" in blog Jest joins OpenJS Foundation @rickhanlonii

- https://developers.intern.facebook.com/blog/post/2022/05/11/meta-open-source-transfers-jest-to-openjs-foundation/
+ https://developers.facebook.com/blog/post/2022/05/11/meta-open-source-transfers-jest-to-openjs-foundation/

Test plan

Deploy preview.

Original link has "intern" in it, which is not available for external users.
Copy link
Member

@SimenB SimenB left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks!

@SimenB SimenB changed the title fix: udpate link in articale "Jest joins OpenJS Foundation" docs: update link in article "Jest joins OpenJS Foundation" May 24, 2022
@SimenB SimenB merged commit 5f89ce2 into jestjs:main May 24, 2022
@Dennis273 Dennis273 deleted the patch-2 branch May 24, 2022 07:17
@github-actions
Copy link

This pull request has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.
Please note this issue tracker is not a help forum. We recommend using StackOverflow or our discord channel for questions.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 24, 2022
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants