This repository was archived by the owner on Jul 10, 2025. It is now read-only.
New functions for retrieving and changing rule values #70
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…nge_option(rule, name, value) and get_option(rule, name).
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I use rule.py as a standalone library for parsing and bulk changing rules.
Here are 3 functions I have added to make my life easier
The header is fixed so change_header takes the rule, index to the header item and value to change it to.
change_option takes rule, name of the option and a value. It's just a combination of remove and add.
get_option takes a rule and a name. Used for checking option values. Will only return first found option with given name.