Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for DOIT #811

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 24, 2024
Merged

Add support for DOIT #811

merged 2 commits into from
Jun 24, 2024

Conversation

vbgl
Copy link
Member

@vbgl vbgl commented May 28, 2024

This is derived from PR #736. It adds to the architecture descriptions data about which instructions have “Data Operand Independent Timing” (DOIT). The CT checkers can use this data to verify that sensitive (secret) information is only operated through such instructions.

@vbgl vbgl force-pushed the pr-736 branch 2 times, most recently from b4eac59 to 0de273b Compare May 28, 2024 12:06
@vbgl vbgl marked this pull request as ready for review May 28, 2024 13:04
@vbgl vbgl changed the title Pr 736 Add support for DOIT May 28, 2024
@vbgl vbgl force-pushed the pr-736 branch 2 times, most recently from a2e0e2b to 552b683 Compare May 28, 2024 14:03
@vbgl vbgl added this to the 2024.06.0 milestone May 28, 2024
@vbgl vbgl force-pushed the pr-736 branch 4 times, most recently from 4c3e4bd to 5a2cae1 Compare June 14, 2024 13:40
J08nY and others added 2 commits June 17, 2024 21:15
Copy link
Contributor

@J08nY J08nY left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me. Though long term, the automation for extraction of the lists should live somewhere, because it would get lost otherwise.

@bgregoir bgregoir merged commit a63434e into main Jun 24, 2024
1 check passed
@bgregoir bgregoir deleted the pr-736 branch June 24, 2024 15:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants