Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Mark operator docs as deprecated and update FAQ for choosing an installation method #15584

Open
craigbox opened this issue Aug 21, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@craigbox
Copy link
Contributor

https://istio.io/latest/blog/2024/in-cluster-operator-deprecation-announcement/ means we need to mark the Operator docs as deprecated and update the FAQ to reflect such.

Regarding said FAQ, @bleggett writes

This FAQ needs a rework, the leadoff for istioctl is

The simplest and most qualified installation and management path with high security.

Which is

  • not a useful or meaningful (or grammatically correct) sentence
  • categorically false (there is absolutely no security advantage to installing with istioctl versus helm, it's exactly equivalent)

This is probably a vestige from the Helm 2 days, if I had to guess, which was deprecated like 6 years ago.

That FAQ should also either discourage the use of istioctl manifest generate or also mention helm template which does the same thing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant