You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Similar to RFC or EIP, it would be good to refer to IPIP with a number as soon as they pass a "consideration" threshold.
At the moment, issues and PRs are opened with a title "IPIP ". Having some sort of number assignment would help to consistently reference IPIP.
For instance, the IPIP defining IPIP would be IPIP-1, and follows. At first, this could be pruned by the steward team, or chosen by the IPIP proposer (if there are some particular number that appeal).
Similar to RFC or EIP, it would be good to refer to IPIP with a number as soon as they pass a "consideration" threshold.
At the moment, issues and PRs are opened with a title "IPIP ". Having some sort of number assignment would help to consistently reference IPIP.
For instance, the IPIP defining IPIP would be IPIP-1, and follows. At first, this could be pruned by the steward team, or chosen by the IPIP proposer (if there are some particular number that appeal).
IPIP-1 should be revised accordingly
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: