Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Gateway Diagnostics #1140

Closed
hacdias opened this issue Sep 23, 2019 · 3 comments
Closed

Gateway Diagnostics #1140

hacdias opened this issue Sep 23, 2019 · 3 comments
Labels
kind/discussion Topical discussion; usually not changes to codebase kind/enhancement A net-new feature or improvement to an existing feature need/author-input Needs input from the original author P2 Medium: Good to have, but can wait until someone steps up status/blocked Unable to be worked further until needs are met topic/design-content Content design, writing, information architecture topic/design-ux UX strategy, research, not solely visual design topic/devexp Developer Experience topic/interop Interoperability

Comments

@hacdias
Copy link
Member

hacdias commented Sep 23, 2019

We could use IPFS Desktop to get some diagnostic data about the gateways with user's permission. That would allow us to get some info on why are is the gateway so slow at some times and really fast on others.

@hacdias
Copy link
Member Author

hacdias commented Sep 27, 2019

@olizilla could you give me more info on this, please?

@lidel lidel added the need/triage Needs initial labeling and prioritization label Jul 6, 2021
@SgtPooki SgtPooki added kind/discussion Topical discussion; usually not changes to codebase P2 Medium: Good to have, but can wait until someone steps up status/blocked Unable to be worked further until needs are met kind/enhancement A net-new feature or improvement to an existing feature topic/design-content Content design, writing, information architecture topic/design-ux UX strategy, research, not solely visual design need/author-input Needs input from the original author topic/devexp Developer Experience topic/interop Interoperability and removed need/triage Needs initial labeling and prioritization labels May 9, 2022
@SgtPooki
Copy link
Member

SgtPooki commented May 9, 2022

When this idea is fleshed out more, can we add details to ipfs/ipfs-webui#1925 ?

@SgtPooki
Copy link
Member

SgtPooki commented May 9, 2022

Actually, I just noticed how old this is. I'm going to add to the other issue as is and close this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/discussion Topical discussion; usually not changes to codebase kind/enhancement A net-new feature or improvement to an existing feature need/author-input Needs input from the original author P2 Medium: Good to have, but can wait until someone steps up status/blocked Unable to be worked further until needs are met topic/design-content Content design, writing, information architecture topic/design-ux UX strategy, research, not solely visual design topic/devexp Developer Experience topic/interop Interoperability
Projects
No open projects
Archived in project
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants