Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Find a "definitive" structure #100

Open
laurentsenta opened this issue Jun 29, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Find a "definitive" structure #100

laurentsenta opened this issue Jun 29, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@laurentsenta
Copy link
Contributor

We had a few back and forths with test structures, spec names, etc.
See https://github.com/ipfs/gateway-conformance/pull/79/files, #92 (comment), and #87 (comment).

Could we find a "definitive" structure for organizing tests and specs?
What about we use spec id or PR to the spec repo as a test name and spec id work?

Take cors, we could have cors-000 (before specification, tests coming from sharness), then cors-pr-423, etc.

The current "mainstream" version of cors would be a spec group with all the specs that compose a regular cors gateway.
We could even pin these on dates, like cors-2023 would be all the specs active during 2023.

End goal is:

  • structure is deterministic so that contributors & users know how to go from spec to tests,
  • this opens up a way to connect the process of adding test with adding IPIP specs.
@laurentsenta
Copy link
Contributor Author

PathGatewayDAG = Leaf{"path-dag-gateway", stable}

@laurentsenta
Copy link
Contributor Author

Also #92 (comment)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant