Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[SYCL][Reduction] Support range version with multiple reductions #7456

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 21, 2022

Conversation

aelovikov-intel
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

@steffenlarsen steffenlarsen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@aelovikov-intel
Copy link
Contributor Author

aelovikov-intel commented Nov 21, 2022

@intel/llvm-gatekeepers , can we merge this? Failures seems to be related to infrastructure and I have added a mention of it into our internal bug report of a similar issue seen on other PRs.

@pvchupin pvchupin merged commit 572bc50 into intel:sycl Nov 21, 2022
aelovikov-intel added a commit to aelovikov-intel/llvm that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2022
* ext::oneapi::reduction removed in intel#6634
* sycl::item in kernel supported since intel#7478
* sycl::range + many reductions implemented in intel#7456

There might be other things that have been implemented already, but I
cannot immediately identify them, if any.
bader pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 13, 2022
* ext::oneapi::reduction removed in
#6634
* sycl::item in kernel supported since
#7478
* sycl::range + many reductions implemented in
#7456
* CPU reduction performance implemented in
#6164
* span support implemented in #6019

There might be other things that have been implemented already, but I
cannot immediately identify them, if any.
@aelovikov-intel aelovikov-intel deleted the reduction-range-multi branch April 7, 2023 15:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants