Skip to content

DLRM with ipex 1.10 #213

Closed
Closed
@Peach-He

Description

@Peach-He

Hi,
Not sure if you have plan on upgrading DLRM code to ipex 1.10. I tried to upgrade the DLRM code with ipex 1.10 based on the patch from https://github.com/intel/intel-extension-for-pytorch/blob/0.2/torch_patches/models/0001-enable-dlrm-distributed-training-for-cpu.patch and noticed performance regression.
Micro benchmark showed that all_to_all had 2x worse performance after upgrading ipex 1.10. Any idea?

system config:

  • torch ccl 1.10, pytorch 1.10, ipex 1.10
  • single node, 2 ranks per node

all2all ipex v0.2:
all2all-ipex02
all2all ipex 1.10:
all2all-ipex110

test code:

import torch
import os

import extend_distributed as ext_dist

if __name__ == "__main__":
    ext_dist.init_distributed(backend='ccl')
    inputs = []
    tensor1 = torch.ones(262144, 16, dtype=torch.bfloat16)
    tensor2 = torch.ones(262144, 16, dtype=torch.bfloat16)
    inputs.append(tensor1)
    inputs.append(tensor2)
    with torch.autograd.profiler.profile(True) as prof:
        for _ in range(10):
            a2a_req = ext_dist.alltoall(inputs, None)
            ly_sparse = a2a_req.wait()
    print(prof.key_averages().table(sort_by="cpu_time_total"))

Thanks

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions