You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have very mixed feelings about enabling even more linters :) Yes, I absolutely want to do this.
However, we need to put a pause on this until we can consistently get the
linter jobs to run. It is not fair to our contributors or ourselves, to constantly have flaky tests that are failing due to resource issues because the linters are currently so heavy.
Even last night the windows linter test failed due to memory issues, even with GOGC=1 set. It was not a timeout on golangci-lint is 30mins and the CircleCI no output timeout is 30mins.
Rather than enabling more and more linters, I would appreciate some time put into figuring out how we can ensure these jobs pass consistently.
@srebhan
I've reviewed the jobs from the past week, and I have a feeling that after this PR: #14639, all linter jobs (which used the code introduced by the mentioned PR) had no issues with OOM or timing out.
If they failed, it was because they encountered a problem in the code ;)
Use Case
This issue starts discussion about enabling:
Added here: securego/gosec#973
Expected behavior
Decision if rule should be enabled or not.
Actual behavior
For this rule no findings were found in current code.
Additional info
For this rule no additional configuration can be provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: