You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For this rule following findings were found in current code:
plugins/common/proxy/socks5_test.go:23:12 gosec G102: Binds to all network interfaces
plugins/inputs/kafka_consumer/kafka_consumer_test.go:595:19 gosec G102: Binds to all network interfaces
plugins/inputs/x509_cert/x509_cert_test.go:86:15 gosec G102: Binds to all network interfaces
All of them are in tests (can be muted by //#nosec comment). But maybe it is worth to enable it to avoid such bindings in production code?
Additional info
For this rule no additional configuration can be provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Use Case
This issue starts discussion about enabling:
Rule is mapped to CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor.
Expected behavior
Decision if rule should be enabled or not.
Actual behavior
For this rule following findings were found in current code:
All of them are in tests (can be muted by
//#nosec
comment). But maybe it is worth to enable it to avoid such bindings in production code?Additional info
For this rule no additional configuration can be provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: