-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 129
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Metadata file about latest release is updated too early #294
Comments
On checking, I find that the 20240725 builds are labelled as |
I see that subsequent new release 20240726 fixes the observations mentioned above about the missing/wrong binaries in 20240725 - although that is tangential to the issue raised here. |
All of this is fixed though agree that file should only be updated when the release is promoted to stable. Kind of a chicken and egg problem though? The file would be temporarily stale if we only updated it after promoting. |
Why would it be stale? That independent file (which is not part of any release) points to the latest release and should be updated immediately after a new promotion is completed. Old releases last forever so are still valid. When I raised this issue the file was pointing to 20240725 but Github was saying that release was "pre-release". |
It would be stale because it would be pointing to a release that isn't the latest release, despite being called |
The file available at https://raw.githubusercontent.com/indygreg/python-build-standalone/latest-release/latest-release.json is supposed to point to the latest release but I notice that it currently points to 20240725 which is in prelease. It should point to 20240713 which is the latest current release. That file should be updated only after the release is formalized.
BTW, that pending release 20240725 only has
-install_only_stripped
builds, no-install_only
builds are present.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: