When I use a condition with path greater than 0 the properies all EdiValue paths preciding are left null.

[cleftheris]

There is an internal read cache that is used to temporarily store the all the already read values as the reader advances to the next tokens inside the file stream (text buffer). This is called the ReadCache and it is reset whenever the serializer reaches the beginning of the next segment.

The current design introduces the following problem: Although the sole purpose of the readcache is to help serializer make search operations (for conditional deserialization) without loosing any values, a loss may occur because we are advancing the reader and not being able to check the contents of the cache. This is exactly what seems to be happening with multiple condition attributes.

[cleftheris]

This continues the discussion with @Nekeniehl from issue #34
An example would be this transmission fragment

IMD++Z01'
IMD++Z10'
IMD++Z14+Z07'

plus the following mapping

 [EdiMessage]
    public class Message_ORDRSP
    {
        [EdiCondition("Z01", Path = "IMD/1/0")]
        [EdiCondition("Z10", Path = "IMD/1/0")]
        public List<IMD> IMD_List { get; set; }

        [EdiCondition("Z01", "Z10", CheckFor = EdiConditionCheckType.NotEqual, Path = "IMD/1/0")]
        public IMD IMD_Other { get; set; }

        /// <summary>
        /// Item Description
        /// </summary>
        [EdiSegment, EdiPath("IMD")]
        public class IMD
        {
            [EdiValue(Path = "IMD/0")]
            public string FieldA { get; set; }

            [EdiValue(Path = "IMD/1")]
            public string FieldB { get; set; }

            [EdiValue(Path = "IMD/2")]
            public string FieldC { get; set; }
        }
    }

results to the correct creating of containers but null property values for FieldA FieldB FieldC because of Condition.Path IMD/1/0 paths IMD/0/0 and IMD/1/0 won't map.

I nailed it and will push a fix today hopefully.

[Nekeniehl]

Thanks for the fix! I will come back to work on Tuesday and see if I manage to retest and pull the POCO. Thanks for your support!

[Nekeniehl]

Tested and working, this also makes work ticket #38. Thanks.