You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently IHM inserts a new field ihm_model_id into the atom_site table. This complicates code that reads these files because it will likely use an existing mmCIF reader for atom_site that does not know about the ihm_model_id. It might be better to use the atom_site pdbx_PDB_model_num field. That field is necessary in any case to correctly parse the atom_site table into multiple models. The mapping of pdbx_PDB_model_num to ihm_model_id could be another IHM table allowing the IHM extension to be self-contained without injecting fields into categories from other dictionaries.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently IHM inserts a new field ihm_model_id into the atom_site table. This complicates code that reads these files because it will likely use an existing mmCIF reader for atom_site that does not know about the ihm_model_id. It might be better to use the atom_site pdbx_PDB_model_num field. That field is necessary in any case to correctly parse the atom_site table into multiple models. The mapping of pdbx_PDB_model_num to ihm_model_id could be another IHM table allowing the IHM extension to be self-contained without injecting fields into categories from other dictionaries.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: